We performed a comparison between Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] and Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Dell Technologies, NetApp, Pure Storage and others in All-Flash Storage."It helps simplify storage. When you're running Pure all-flash, you don't have to do a lot of the old Oracle best practices. You don't have to worry about putting log files on a different disk channel than the data files, and those types of issues... That has made it vastly easier to do large volumes, rapid provisioning in databases, without taking a performance hit."
"We have tons of capacity on it."
"We can store more for a cheaper price as opposed to paying for larger devices and larger rack spaces which get outdated sooner and which we'd have to change every two years. It simplifies storage for us."
"The initial setup is very straightforward. You simply plug it in and turn it on."
"The initial setup was very straightforward and very quick. It was up and running in our data center within 24 hours of receiving it."
"The tool has reduced our power consumption."
"It's actually very stable"
"The simplicity of it. The performance is good, but the simplicity is the best thing. Storage management is quite complex, but Pure Storage is easy to manage."
"The most valuable features are simplified provisioning and management, de-duplication, and built-in encryption."
"It's actually shaking hands with the workflow solutions much better than any other storage."
"I would like to see a Nagios monitoring plugin which watches the health and performance of the system. The only one available just checks volume capacity."
"I feel like there is too much automation; the user doesn't have any manual input."
"I would like to get a weekly report of how our storage has been used, and if there is any storage sitting there not being used."
"The GUI could improve, it could be more intuitive. There is hidden functionality."
"There are a lot of things to improve."
"The integration capabilities could be improved."
"In the next release of the solution I would like to see Vormetric native block encryption."
"It would be nice to have a better view of the allocated capacity on their Platform as a Service solution because we have to do some manual calculations to understand how much we are going to pay every month to use the storage that is allocated."
"The exterior display needs to be improved."
"It has to be flexible according to the customer's requirements. It has to be aligned with the customer business and the business environment."
More Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Earn 20 points
Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in All-Flash Storage while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is ranked 35th in All-Flash Storage. Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] is rated 10.0, while Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] writes "Good price-performance ratio, provides simplified provisioning and management". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System writes "Has a fantastic feature-set and works well with workflow solutions". Hitachi Universal Storage VM [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Oracle FS1 Flash Storage System is most compared with .
See our list of best All-Flash Storage vendors.
We monitor all All-Flash Storage reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.