HCL Verse vs Symphony comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HCLTech Logo
625 views|537 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Symphony Logo
815 views|657 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HCL Verse and Symphony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Zimbra and others in Email Applications.
To learn more, read our detailed Email Applications Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"HCL Verse has a nice interface and it is a practical email solution. There are a diverse set of features, such as the search bar on top of the screens.""The most valuable feature is the mail server."

More HCL Verse Pros →

"I found the RAM Commander module in Symphony to be the most valuable.""The entire product is good.""The solution is user-friendly, and it is very good security-wise.""The overall functions are good.""Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight."

More Symphony Pros →

Cons
"Security is very important to us, so improvements to this functionality are welcome.""The solution could improve by allowing us to use a color that we want in the editing boxes."

More HCL Verse Cons →

"The solution needs to improve CI.""The area that needs to be improved is modular asset management. When we are uploading the assets in bulk, it is not aligned.""To improve the situation, enhancing the functionality for integrating with other applications and addressing ticketing issues is crucial.""The solution is very expensive, and its pricing could be improved.""Compared to established vendors, it lacks user flexibility and customization, especially in the PM module."

More Symphony Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "This is an affordable solution but the price could be improved."
  • "The price of the solution is reasonable."
  • More HCL Verse Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's a costly product, but the number of available features justifies it."
  • "It is fairly an expensive product, but works for us."
  • "Symphony is expensive."
  • More Symphony Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Email Applications solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:Symphony and Laravel are the most comfortable frameworks for any developer. It is also lightweight.
    Top Answer:The solution needs to improve CI.
    Ranking
    14th
    out of 24 in Email Applications
    Views
    625
    Comparisons
    537
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    815
    Comparisons
    657
    Reviews
    4
    Average Words per Review
    318
    Rating
    7.0
    Comparisons
    HCL Notes logo
    Compared 60% of the time.
    HCL Domino logo
    Compared 14% of the time.
    Office 365 logo
    Compared 13% of the time.
    Huddle logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Hub logo
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Microsoft Teams logo
    Compared 49% of the time.
    Slack logo
    Compared 41% of the time.
    Drupal logo
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Also Known As
    Verse, IBM Verse
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Verse is a powerful email hosting solution that enables users to access their business communications from a laptop or desktop browser or from a mobile device. This email and business messaging experience is based on an innovative user-centric design, including social analytics and advanced search capabilities. IBM Verse helps users quickly find and focus on what content is most important, empowering them to build stronger working relationships while optimizing business results.

    Symphony’s secure, cloud-based communications service delivers the next wave in organizational productivity where markets and individuals come together to create vibrant communities in which to share content, insights and opinions without compromising on organizational compliance.

    Sample Customers
    Canon Marketing Japan Inc., Australian Trade Commission, BTC, Havas, Canal Barge Co.Inc., RAVInvest, Elemental Path, WDR mediagroup
    BNP Paribas, HSBC, Deutsche Bank, Citi, Credit Suisse, JP Morgan Chase
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Government16%
    Comms Service Provider11%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm64%
    Computer Software Company6%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    University3%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business10%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise81%
    Buyer's Guide
    Email Applications
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Google, Microsoft, Zimbra and others in Email Applications. Updated: April 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HCL Verse is ranked 14th in Email Applications while Symphony is ranked 8th in Enterprise Social Software with 5 reviews. HCL Verse is rated 9.0, while Symphony is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of HCL Verse writes "Stable, scalable, and good interface". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Symphony writes "Makes tasks like network planning and performance monitoring much easier". HCL Verse is most compared with HCL Notes, HCL Domino, Office 365, Huddle and Hub, whereas Symphony is most compared with Microsoft Teams, Slack and Drupal.

    We monitor all Email Applications reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.