We performed a comparison between F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender (EOL) and Radware DefensePro based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cloudflare, NETSCOUT, Akamai and others in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection."The user interface was recently changed in one of the latest versions, but we find it to be very good. The change was an improvement."
"Most competitor's environments will have their appliance do a hard stop. This means they weigh traffic from real customers and that affects the overall business experience. F5, on the other hand, uses contextual information to be able to specify what is malicious traffic and what is real traffic. That comes from its pool of intelligence, and from its threat intelligence team."
"Radware DefensePro is one of the best solutions for on-premise protection."
"It has kept us up and operational on a day-to-day basis, without being interrupted by an attack from outside sources."
"A flexible affordable solution for defense against DDos attacks."
"A valuable feature is the speed of signature updates."
"All of our traffic has to pass through the appliance, so we can very quickly mitigate the attack. This is a very valuable feature. On top of that, it's not only volumetric attack protection that the solution offers, but also layer 7 attack protection as well."
"They have a hybrid model approach if a client wants to go that way."
"The DDoS protection that the solution provides is its most valuable feature."
"This solution is extremely scalable and has the highest level throughput (100G) which complies with Telco deployment."
"The solution needs better stability when it's utilized with virtual solutions."
"We've seen the rise of smaller entities, and their requirements grow by the day. Having the ability to give them appliances that fit their needs in terms of that small or medium-sized segment and the pricing they can handle would be something that's great to see."
"They should add artificial intelligence to the platform. It is currently missing the machine learning piece."
"They need to increase the limit of devices that we can manage."
"It could incorporate more intelligence for reacting with web site visitors."
"I would like to see more focus on layer seven protection."
"We would like to have seven-layer functionality."
"This product would be improved if ongoing live monitoring with dashboards were added."
"If they would go to a cloud-based approach, that would give much more flexibility in terms of working with them."
"There needs to be more reporting."
Earn 20 points
F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender (EOL) doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection while Radware DefensePro is ranked 5th in Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection with 22 reviews. F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender (EOL) is rated 8.0, while Radware DefensePro is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender (EOL) writes "Excellent DDoS protection with responsive technical support and a straightforward setup". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Radware DefensePro writes "Regular signature update with good reporting and analytics". F5 DDoS Hybrid Defender (EOL) is most compared with , whereas Radware DefensePro is most compared with Arbor DDoS, Cloudflare, Imperva DDoS, Fortinet FortiDDoS and Check Point DDoS Protector.
See our list of best Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection vendors.
We monitor all Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.