Earn 20 points
Gain visibility into software development with a versatile and secure management platform for traditional and bi-modal development. With Digital.ai TeamForge, software teams have the flexibility to choose the best possible workflows without risking overall process compliance.
Micro Focus ALM/Quality Center serves as the single pane of glass to govern software quality and implement rigorous, auditable lifecycle processes. Designed for complex multi-application environments, organizations can achieve high efficiency in their testing and measure quality with a requirements-driven and risk-based testing approach. Advanced reporting provides a complete view across all releases to gain new insights and make informed decisions. With numerous deployment options, open integrations with common tools and strong data controls, ALM/Quality Center is a perfect choice for enterprises that need to enforce standards, ensure compliance and adapt to changing tools.
Digital.ai TeamForge is ranked 25th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites while Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is ranked 8th in Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites with 23 reviews. Digital.ai TeamForge is rated 0.0, while Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is rated 6.6. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Micro Focus ALM Quality Center writes "We can have multiple users execute tests independently on their own computers because the UFT scripts are stored online". Digital.ai TeamForge is most compared with Rally Software, Jira and TFS, whereas Micro Focus ALM Quality Center is most compared with Micro Focus ALM Octane, Microsoft Azure DevOps, Jira, Tricentis qTest and Micro Focus UFT One.
See our list of best Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites vendors.
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.