We performed a comparison between Dell Avamar and Delphix based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Backup and Recovery solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Dell EMC Avamar is easy to work with and is user-friendly."
"Client deduplication."
"Its deduplication technologies are the best in the market, currently."
"The solution is easy to use and has high performance."
"Graphically, it's very user interactive. It's got a very nice interface."
"I have found the product to be scalable."
"It is a very complete product."
"Stable and scalable backup and recovery software, with good technical support."
"The most valuable feature is creating virtual databases."
"It's really easy to install."
"The performance offered by the product, its price, and its ability to handle structured and unstructured data were good when compared to the other products in the market."
"Delphix interfaces are simple to use and very user friendly."
"Delphix's data distribution is powerful. It's easy to distribute data with this solution. The main advantage of Delphix is that it generates copies of data."
"It provides the ability to roll back to a point in time or roll forward without the assistance of a DBA."
"The product is efficient in handling large volumes of data."
"The most valuable feature is VDB provisioning."
"Avamar is not the best tool when it comes to taking Azure backups. Like Commvault, if Avamar can support VM-level backups for the cloud, that would make it a bit better."
"The user interface still needs to have some level of improvement. It could be more user-friendly and intuitive."
"If you don't have DPA, the reporting features are not as user-friendly, so reporting is something that they can improve on."
"The solution could be a bit easier to use in the sense that they need to make it simpler to backup products and restore items."
"Dell hasn't done a good job at handling these upgrades, or the way EMC used to handle them."
"Avamar needs a greater emphasis on storage targets. If it's going to keep pace with the times, it needs more ability to leverage cloud storage."
"Backup image browse times should be faster."
"There are limitations when trying to use this solution with Hyper-V."
"The solution's price needs improvement."
"The solution’s self-service portal must be more interactive and user-friendly."
"Delphix is a strong solution for virtualization, but it's not strong enough for creating data, so we have to use another solution for creating new data."
"Delphix is quite expensive."
"Delphix could be improved with better usability and an agentless option."
"GUI could be improved."
"Could be improved with richer reporting capabilities."
"My only complaint about this solution is the price."
Dell Avamar is ranked 12th in Backup and Recovery with 81 reviews while Delphix is ranked 1st in Test Data Management with 15 reviews. Dell Avamar is rated 7.6, while Delphix is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Dell Avamar writes "Stable, integrates well with other solutions, and has a good price, but its UI needs a refresh". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Delphix writes "Handles large volumes of data with ease, but the self-service portal must be more user-friendly". Dell Avamar is most compared with Dell PowerProtect Data Manager, Veeam Backup & Replication, Dell NetWorker, Dell PowerProtect DP (IDPA) and Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain), whereas Delphix is most compared with Informatica Test Data Management (TDM), Denodo, Broadcom Test Data Manager, IBM InfoSphere Optim Test Data Management (TDM) and Actifio. See our Dell Avamar vs. Delphix report.
We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
