We performed a comparison between Cyberbit SOC 3D [EOL] and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk and others in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR).More ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Cyberbit SOC 3D [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is ranked 19th in Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) with 4 reviews. Cyberbit SOC 3D [EOL] is rated 0.0, while ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is rated 8.0. On the other hand, the top reviewer of ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) writes "The tool could be integrated into any environment, but it was expensive, and the deployment process was complex". Cyberbit SOC 3D [EOL] is most compared with , whereas ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) is most compared with Anomali ThreatStream, Recorded Future, ThreatQ, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR and Anomali Match.
See our list of best Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) vendors.
We monitor all Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.