We performed a comparison between Cradlepoint NetCloud and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."Cradlepoint NetCloud is very stable."
"It is easy to set up and requires a single administrator to maintain it."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is the automatic failover."
"It's 100% stable, it's always stable. We haven't had any bugs. The solution works very well and we haven't had any problems."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"We have excellent technical support. They have always been helpful when we have needed them."
"The hardware abstraction layer, being able to make the VMs portable when moving to a different platform or over a WAN."
"The implementation phase for vCenter Orchestrator was easy."
"The stability of the product is very good."
"vCenter Orchestrator is easy to use."
"The DRS feature from VMware is very valuable to us because it balances workloads."
"The performance of group-based clouds should be enhanced."
"In our situation, the initial setup was complex."
"It is missing important settings options."
"Storage has room for improvement. It's a big problem for our solution. The interface also needs improvement, it should be simplified."
"I believe vCenter Orchestrator should be part of VMware vSphere's basic bundle. As a product, vCenter Orchestrator should not be licensed at all because the world has progressed way beyond what it can offer."
"The response time of vCenter Orchestrator's support could be improved."
"In the next release, to make it easier to write the workflows, I would l like to see more HTML GUIs."
"When the SSO certificate needs to be renewed, the upgrading and testing are quite complicated."
"VMware tools would benefit from more automation. When installing our devices and servers, we often need to install the VMware tools manually. This process should be automated during the VM installation process."
"The licensing is expensive and should be improved."
"I believe a transparent view and better terms of condition between Oracle and vCenter Orchestrator would be helpful."
Cradlepoint NetCloud is ranked 18th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 3 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. Cradlepoint NetCloud is rated 7.0, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cradlepoint NetCloud writes "Simple to install and reliable, but technical support should improve their response time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". Cradlepoint NetCloud is most compared with Peplink SpeedFusion, Meraki SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Cisco SD-WAN and Abiquo, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
