We performed a comparison between Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) and Keeper based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, HPE Aruba Networking, Fortinet and others in Network Access Control (NAC)."For customers, it's great. It has a GUI, so the customers themselves can edit ACLs or even modify the policies. It's also an all-in-one solution with RADIUS and TACACS."
"In terms of scalability, you need to factor in your licenses. With a virtual platform, the scalability is more than sufficient. We have over one thousand users."
"The valuable feature of the solution lies in its integration capabilities with other applications."
"Not having to trust devices and being able to set those levels of trust and more finely control our network is a benefit."
"The best feature of the Cisco ISE platform is that it is compatible with Microsoft products."
"The most valuable feature is AnyConnect Posture because it scans all the programs on the workstation and checks if the antivirus is up to date, as well as the cryptographic keys on our SSD."
"Member Access Control and the ability to integrate all Cisco wireless, Cisco networking, switches, routers, and firewalls."
"ISE's most valuable feature is integration between IT and OTs."
"It saves us from duplicating passwords for different accounts."
"The installation and its use are very simple."
"It is very easy to install and setup."
"Available for Windows platforms and also Mac OS and Linux systems."
"I can access my passwords from any Internet connected device."
"It is very easy to use, intuitive, and cost effective."
"The chat support is quick. I have never encountered any problems. On the contrary, they have been very helpful and kind."
"i have only one password to remember, which is the one to get me into Keeper."
"Cisco ISE could be simplified somewhat. I would also prefer certificate-based authentication over confirmation-based authentication for all the processes. It's possible for us to do a workaround, but the process needs to be simplified."
"The compliance and posture don't always work. They should make it more stable. With each upgrade, we lose some functionality. We have to wait for another upgrade."
"We do tend to run into a lot of issues with ISE when it comes to bugs."
"The opinion of my coworkers, and it's mine as well, is that the user interface could use some tender loving care. It seems counterintuitive sometimes. If you go to the logs, it's hard to figure out which one you need to look at."
"Some of ISE's features need to be more agile. For example, we couldn't integrate our data because Cisco needs your data to be in its own format."
"The primary issue is the slowness of the application and the web interface. We have multiple admin nodes and app nodes. So when I need to get some information about a particular user, the GUI would take ten to fifteen seconds in loading when we need to know right away."
"It could be less monolithic. It's one huge application, and it does everything under the sun, so it's hard to deal with and upgrade and manage."
"The interface is not very user-friendly and it is not simple to use."
"The technical support for this solution could be faster support and improved if they had a better understanding of my questions."
"Maybe a sort of category organizer to help with organizing passwords for different things, such as banking, medical, shopping, and school."
"Possible offline access to passwords. Therefore, when internet access is unavailable, I can still access my vault."
"The password rotation feature could be improved."
"The user experience and the mobile app could be improved."
"API possible needs improvement. Although, this feature is for enterprises which need more then the usual usage."
"Keeper does not provide password management for mobile apps."
"Ability to set up password profiles that can predefine custom fields and password complexity."
More Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is ranked 1st in Network Access Control (NAC) with 135 reviews while Keeper is ranked 10th in Enterprise Password Managers with 32 reviews. Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is rated 8.2, while Keeper is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) writes "Gives us that extra ability to assist the end user and make sure that we are making them happy". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Keeper writes "It's an inexpensive, scalable solution that has improved our security". Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine) is most compared with Aruba ClearPass, Fortinet FortiNAC, Forescout Platform, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, whereas Keeper is most compared with HashiCorp Vault, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, LastPass and Delinea Secret Server.
We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.