We performed a comparison between Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] and Okta Workforce Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Okta, Google and others in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS)."The most valuable feature in Centrify is the ability to authenticate in a Linux environment, because this is what my customers were looking for. They are coming from a Linux environment, so they appreciate the identity and access management for allowing Linux workloads to authenticate securely."
"The ease of deployment, ease of use, and speed of delivery is what I like about Okta Workforce Identity. It is very easy to use. For a lot of software, you need to be trained extensively and have a very technical background. Okta Workforce Identity is quite simple. You can integrate any software into Okta. They've got a network of 7,000 applications that easily integrate into it."
"We can automate the process of adding users to Okta if they are activated in Active Directory, or if they are added to the database of applications or Active Directory in the last couple of days."
"The product is easy to use."
"We face no challenges in integrating the product with our legacy systems."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Its simplicity and its integration with various vendor-agnostic platforms are the most valuable features."
"We find the solution to be stable."
"Other than Okta being an easy and awesome integration tool, one of the best features it has is the provisioning and deprovisioning, which makes management way easier. You don't need to be too technical to understand how it works."
"What can be improved in Centrify is the integration between the on-premise environment, specifically for Linux environments with the cloud infrastructure, such as Microsoft as it was during my time as a solution architect."
"Okta Workforce Identity can improve by having more features in governance."
"It is challenging to obtain a comprehensive backup."
"Okta Workforce Identity could improve the support system, they are too slow."
"In some setup cases, there are issues with attributes not going in properly."
"The integration with third-party tools needs to be improved."
"Therefore, if you have 10 million users, that's almost 100 million, so it is costly."
"We've not had any problems with Okta."
"SSO and MFA for improved end-user experience, and protection against password spray attacks, account password self-service."
Earn 20 points
Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) while Okta Workforce Identity is ranked 2nd in Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) with 56 reviews. Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] is rated 7.0, while Okta Workforce Identity is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] writes "Has system multi-factor authentication abilities but is lacking connection between on-premise and cloud-based solutions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Workforce Identity writes "Extremely easy to work with, simple to set up, and reasonably priced ". Centrify Endpoint Services [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Okta Workforce Identity is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Google Cloud Identity, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt and Auth0.
See our list of best Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.