We performed a comparison between Broadcom DX Application Performance Management, CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL], and IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
"We make custom dashboards for our development areas so they can understand how busy traffic affects their application with traffic. They can see how traffic directly affects their application in positive or negative ways."
"The feature that I have found the most valuable is its user interface."
"Service maturity when you can retrieve the normal metrics for every major aspect of each module and delivering this info to the correct eyes."
"I have found Broadcom DX Application Performance Management to be scalable."
"Some of its valuable features include transaction traces, dashboards, and metric grouping to see combined data."
"The deployment was easy."
"We understand for APM, it has the ability to drill down and do the end-to-end monitoring that we are looking for."
"The triage can find the root cause for pent up issues."
"The most valuable feature is the fault management monitoring."
"The pricing is relatively low compared to other solutions in this area. I'd go so far as to say it's even significantly less than the competition."
"IBM's main value lies in its integration with its own technologies, which can be seen as a benefit in environments where IBM products are extensively used."
"The solution is very stable. We never had any issues with stability."
"Java Console uses too much memory."
"The stability could be more reliable."
"There are several areas that could be improved in Broadcom DX Application Performance Management. One of the main areas is user experience monitoring, which is currently not available. Additionally, they need to develop a solution that is compatible with OpenShift 4, as their current solution only works when an agent is installed within the image, which is not possible in OpenShift 4 as it removes the agent."
"The interface is getting a little old."
"User Experience is a BIG one. Integration of all of APM components into one swift deployment."
"Stability could actually be helped because it is a wrapper or an agent on our system. If we are having a bad day in production or if other resources are being utilized, then we will get get gaps in our monitoring system."
"The initial setup is complex."
"The APM upgrade procedure is a bit complicated with compatibility issues which can emerge like between agents and EM/Collectors."
"The user interface needs improvement."
"My biggest complaint about ADA is that you have to rely on dedicated appliances."
"The user interface was not good."
"The installation process is difficult, requiring continuous support and specialist expertise due to our limited knowledge of managing it effectively."
More Broadcom DX Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
More CA Application Delivery Analysis [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
More IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
