We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The best features are that it is a cloud-based and a multi-tenant tool."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its monitoring part to debug certain issues and find problems."
"I have found the solution to be scalable."
"It is easy to learn and implement."
"This is a fairly easy-to-use tool for integration which can be self-taught for those with a bit of a technical background."
"We work on the flow between systems and the most valuable features for that purpose are the mapping of data, interface mapping, and data integration."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"It is stable and scalable."
"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."
"This is a stable platform and we did not encounter any big problems."
"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."
"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."
"The solution is scalable."
"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."
"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration should scale up on the migration area."
"We encountered stability issues occasionally, one to two times a year."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"They need to introduce more configurable functions to remove scripting or coding. Scripting should be minimized. It should have exhaustive functions. Currently, it lacks in this aspect."
"The deployment was simple, but the implementation is missing a lot of capabilities."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"Boomi AtomSphere Integration is not yet exposed to the world as a good product owing to certain shortcomings in the area of marketing where improvements are required."
"The product could be a little bit more user-friendly."
"Automation with the latest websites is not effective. The support of newer websites developed using new technologies would improve this solution."
"Kofax RPA needs to improve integration with SAP and Microsoft. The professional services offered by the tool's team is below par. Its licensing needs to be more modular."
"We are on version 10.6, and the current version seems to be 11. Kofax is cycling the capabilities of the product very quickly. One of the difficulties has been to actually keep up with the capabilities as they've evolved. On the one hand, it is good that the product is getting better, but on the other hand, it is difficult to implement the best way with a product that is evolving constantly."
"The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have custom connectors. It is the only advantage that Microsoft Power Platform has over Kofax RPA. It has more than 800 custom connectors."
"Kofax RPA could improve web-based automation and there should be a choice of what browser we can use, such as Google Chrome, instead of an inbuilt browser from Kofax RPA. Additionally, Kofax RPA is missing an orchestrator that other solutions have, such as UiPath."
"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."
"The solution could use some AI integrated features."
"I would like to see them further enhance the OCR, specifically in the multi-language support."
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Tungsten RPA is ranked 12th in Robotic Process Automation (RPA) with 24 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Tungsten RPA is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tungsten RPA writes "A stable product that provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS and Oracle Integration Cloud Service, whereas Tungsten RPA is most compared with UiPath, Microsoft Power Automate, Blue Prism, Automation Anywhere (AA) and Azure Data Factory. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Tungsten RPA report.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.