Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs Kong Gateway Enterprise comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Boomi Logo
1,275 views|919 comparisons
83% willing to recommend
Kong Logo
13,943 views|10,542 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Boomi AtomSphere API Management and Kong Gateway Enterprise based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The stability of the solution is good.""The product's stability is good.""AtomSphere API Management is a simple platform that's easy to use. If you're using it on-prem, there's a little learning curve.""We can create APIs straightforwardly and quickly and build jobs for data migration.""Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a good product for integrating with Boomi as a backend service.""We can develop almost any interface that we need.""AtomSphere is tightly integrated into the Boomi iPaaS platform. And Boomi has been augmenting AtomSphere API Management for the past couple of years so version 2.0 is better than 1.0."

More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Pros →

"Kong Enterprise comes with some ready plug-ins, which is very good for the customers.""The solution provides good performance.""There are a few features that I like about Kong when it comes to authentication and authorization. Specifically, being able to use Kong for role-based access control (RBAC), and then further being able to integrate the RBAC mechanism with our enterprise directory, was very useful.""We use the solution for load-balancing, caching, and rate-limiting APIs.""The route limiting feature is very valuable.""This is a solid intrusion prevention system that combines a firewall and antivirus in a single solution.""The most valuable feature of Kong Enterprise is its capability to integrate with various security tools.""Good at intercepting traffic and modeling APIs around that."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Pros →

Cons
"Most of the basic functionality is there in Boomi, but APG is a more feature-rich solution.""To some degree, you need to know what type or amount of API you are creating - whether it's a rest API or web service API. You need to know ETL in order to really get the most out of Boomi.""The API management has room for improvement.""Boomi AtomSphere API Management can be improved in terms of threshold management and policy management.""It's difficult to integrate the on-prem application with the Dell Boomi Cloud. We have to check to ensure the Dell domain engine is running. It just requires some service endpoints from our on-prem application to connect to Dell Boomi Cloud to make it available to integrate. It would be better if AtomSphere API Management were offered as a purely SaaS application, so I wouldn't need an on-prem component to make it available. We could make a test call or provide some connection parameters. That should enable it to pull the data.""The product is really complex to manage.""From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper."

More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Cons →

"Kong Enterprise needs to improve its pricing, which starts at hundreds of thousands of dollars. Pricing should be based on API usage rather than monthly. It should improve its documentation as well.""The technical support team's response time needs to be improved.""The product's price is an area of concern where improvements are required.""Understanding the configurations and knowing what needs to be done can be a bit difficult initially.""We are facing issues with the solution's features like reports and traffic analysis.""The tool needs improvement in UX.""Because it is open-source, it should be less expensive than others.""Kong Enterprise has decided not to support the web portal feature anymore, but I think that feature should stay in the on-premises solution."

More Kong Gateway Enterprise Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product can get very expensive quickly if you connect to multiple databases."
  • "Boomi AtomSphere API Management is a cheap product."
  • "Boomi AtomSphere API Management gives customers a good price. Price-wise, the product is good."
  • More Boomi AtomSphere API Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing fees are paid yearly."
  • "The price is really reasonable compared to that of alternative solutions."
  • "There are many factors that influence the price of Kong Enterprise, such as scale, licenses, and usage."
  • "I don't have any information on licensing costs currently."
  • "There is a need to pay towards the licensing charges...In some areas, the functionalities are available free of charge."
  • "Kong Enterprise's pricing is at par compared to the other technologies."
  • "Kong Enterprise is cheaper than Apigee. I rate its pricing as four out of ten."
  • "Kong Enterprise's pricing is reasonable for our company size."
  • More Kong Gateway Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Management solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Even though I am not a salesperson, compared to the other products in the market, Boomi AtomSphere API Management gives customers a good price. Price-wise, the product is good.
    Top Answer:From an improvement perspective, the price could be cheaper.
    Top Answer:The Mulesoft Anypoint API Manager was designed with its users in mind. Though it is a reasonably complex piece of software, it is easy to install and upgrade. While there are different things that one… more »
    Top Answer:The tool's feature that I find most beneficial is rate limiting. In our usage, especially in the financial sector, we prioritize limiting API usage. This is crucial because we provide APIs to other… more »
    Top Answer:Kong Enterprise needs to improve its pricing, which starts at hundreds of thousands of dollars. Pricing should be based on API usage rather than monthly. It should improve its documentation as well.
    Ranking
    15th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    1,275
    Comparisons
    919
    Reviews
    5
    Average Words per Review
    551
    Rating
    7.4
    6th
    out of 64 in API Management
    Views
    13,943
    Comparisons
    10,542
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    417
    Rating
    7.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Boomi API Management
    Learn More
    Overview

    Boomi API Management supports the full lifecycle of APIs in a hybrid environment. Configure APIs and expose real-time integrations effortlessly. Centrally test and deploy APIs and enforce contracts and policies with an API gateway. Monitor the health of APIs with usage dashboards and engage API developers using the catalog and developer portal.

    Kong delivers a next generation API platform built for modern architectures. With a lightnight-fast, lightweight, and flexible core, Kong delivers sub-millisecond latency across all your services. Kong's is deployment-, vendor-, and pattern-agnostic, allowing you to run your services how you want, where you want, and with who you want - from baremetal to cloud, monolith to microservices, service mesh, and beyond.

    Sample Customers
    Avalara, Cornell University, Dropbox
    Cargill, Zillow, Ferrari, WeWork, Healthcare.gov, Yahoo! Japan, Giphy, SkyScanner
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Retailer8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm40%
    Computer Software Company27%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Insurance Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise29%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise67%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business30%
    Large Enterprise70%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise70%
    Buyer's Guide
    Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Boomi AtomSphere API Management is ranked 15th in API Management with 7 reviews while Kong Gateway Enterprise is ranked 6th in API Management with 18 reviews. Boomi AtomSphere API Management is rated 7.4, while Kong Gateway Enterprise is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Boomi AtomSphere API Management writes "Complex to manage, and the documentation is quite hard to learn, though APIs can be created quickly and easily". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Kong Gateway Enterprise writes "Provides role-based access control and can be easily customized with Lua script". Boomi AtomSphere API Management is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Apigee, Amazon API Gateway and SwaggerHub, whereas Kong Gateway Enterprise is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, WSO2 API Manager, Apigee, MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and Apache APISIX. See our Boomi AtomSphere API Management vs. Kong Gateway Enterprise report.

    See our list of best API Management vendors.

    We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.