We performed a comparison between Bitbar, Galen Framework, and OpenText UFT One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."Ability to use different frameworks."
"Game testing and the API for apps are good."
"What I like most about Galen Framework are its advantages, particularly its spec language and the spec file feature."
"Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge."
"My company has not had an issue with OpenText UFT One since we have been using it for the past three to four years."
"The initial setup is relatively easy."
"The solution is easy to integrate with other platforms."
"UFT has improved our ability to regression test."
"It offers a wide range of testing."
"For traditional automation, approximately half of our tests end up automated. Therefore, we are saving half the testing time by pushing it off to automation. That gives it an intrinsic benefit of more time for manual testers and business testers to work on possibly more important and interesting things. For some of our applications, they don't just have to do happy path testing anymore, they can go more in-depth and breadth into the process."
"The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies."
"Their pricing structure is complicated and can be improved."
"Lacking capability options that can be directly integrated."
"There don't seem to be functions available for automatically generating Galen values based on the specifications in the spec file, and this could be a potential improvement for Galen Framework."
"They need to reduce the licensing cost. There's pushback from customers because of the cost."
"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."
"UFT has a recording feature. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording. It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts."
"I would like Micro Focus to provide more information on their portal about their newer products. The information about UFT One was outdated. The image recognition features could also be better."
"Perhaps more coverage as far as different languages go. I'm talking more about object identification."
"The speed could be improved because a large test suite takes some time to execute."
"There is a lot of room for improvement when it comes to friction-free continuous testing across the software life cycle, as a local installation is required to run UFT."
"We used to run it as a test suite. Micro Focus provides that in terms of a test management tool as ALM, but when we think of integrating with a distributed version control system, like Jenkins, there isn't much integration available. That means we need to make use of external solutions to make it work."
Earn 20 points
