We performed a comparison between Barkly [EOL] and Norton Security Premium [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, CrowdStrike and others in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)."Forensics is a valuable feature of Fortinet FortiEDR."
"The solution was relatively easy to deploy."
"The most valuable feature is the analysis, because of the beta structure."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of Fortinet FortiEDR was straightforward."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The main thing is that I feel safe. Because the processes that have been used to get a handle on the attackers are much better than other competitors"
"Fortinet is very user-friendly for customers."
"The setup is pretty simple."
"Very easy to install and use."
"The most valuable feature is the multifunctional protection."
"Protects me from internet vulnerability."
"The product is called Norton 360 all-in-one. It is a full product."
"The antivirus aspect of the solution is very good."
"We like how it can check for issues. That includes files and web browsers."
"With the heightened security around phishing, identity theft, and malware, this is a good product."
"Norton Security Premium is good, and it's pretty simple to install."
"Flexible antivirus and antimalware software. It also provides protection against ransomware. It's flexible, easy to handle, scalable, and stable."
"We've had a lot of false positives; things incorrectly flagged that require manual configuration to allow. Even worse, after we allow a legitimate program, it sometimes gets flagged again after an update. This has caused a lot of extra work for my team."
"We find the solution to be a bit expensive."
"The SIEM could be improved."
"We've encountered challenges during API deployment, occasionally resulting in unstable environments."
"The only minor concern is occasional interference with desired programs."
"The dashboard isn't easy to access and manage."
"FortiEDR can be improved by providing more detailed reporting."
"I would like the solution to extend beyond endpoint protection and include other attack surfaces such as other network components."
"It lacks more sophisticated features and opportunity for customization."
"During scanning, sometimes, there is a heavy load on the workstation. This needs to be improved."
"Security Premium's cost could be lower."
"The only problem with Norton Antivirus is that it consumes a lot of resources like CPU and memory in the background. Whenever it's scanning, my laptop becomes very slow, and the worst part is you cannot do anything about it. As this product is secured by my local IT team, you cannot even kill that process, and that's what I've felt about many other antivirus solutions. I'm using McAfee for personal use, and I have the same problem."
"The product could always be more secure."
"I don't like the password manager of Norton Security Premium."
"It would be helpful for me if this solution works on our cloud backup data."
"Sometimes the program is too complex."
"Occasionally when you open a ticket, there's a lack of understanding that prevents the solution from being resolved directly."
More Norton Security Premium [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Barkly [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) while Norton Security Premium [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 13 reviews. Barkly [EOL] is rated 5.0, while Norton Security Premium [EOL] is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Barkly [EOL] writes "Has an easy to use interface but lacks features and customization options". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Norton Security Premium [EOL] writes "User-friendly solution with good blocking". Barkly [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Norton Security Premium [EOL] is most compared with .
We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.