Avada Software Infrared360 vs Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Avada Software Infrared360 and Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It has role-based access to queues, giving us more insights into problems.""We have easily created use case testing harnesses for specific flows that incorporate various message types.""The administration piece makes it very easy to do MQ administration. It gives us a lot more flexibility and capabilities.""Monitoring that ties into our incident management system""It's what we use for monitoring our MQ system, so the features that they provide are just really, really good.""It allows non-technical users to inspect their individual components within the total infrastructure without disturbing other components and without bothering the technical teams."

More Avada Software Infrared360 Pros →

"At a glance I can easily see what is going on with all of my VMware ​environments, including top consumers of resources.""Real time database monitoring and alerting are valuable.""FxV is valuable as we can playback the session.""The most valuable feature is drill-down monitoring, which shows us from one interface the transaction chain from the front end to back end.""Capacity on database and file servers. I found the algorithms to forecast growth and concerns particularly intuitive.""Having standard monitoring features and a central repository saves us a lot of time and reduces risk of incidents.""Sometimes we can solve problems before they occur.""It provides a history of the activities on our SQL servers."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pros →

Cons
"Some of the graphics in the interface could be improved. It's pretty basic. Some interfaces are not up to what you're used to seeing on other, more Windows-like tools.""The user interface could be sexier and more ergonomic. The competing products have similar problems.""One area where they could improve is with their documentation. Some sections are not up to date with new release information and providing additional samples in some areas would be very helpful.""We are still working with the FTE/MFT subscription monitoring and reporting functionality. That is an area in which we would like to see further development taking place.""We desire a dashboard that could accumulate BOQ lengths per tenant on one screen for all tenants.""The UI can be cumbersome - but we are still using the Viper interface and we have not had the time to check out the Alloy interface which is supposed to be much improved."

More Avada Software Infrared360 Cons →

"Being able to incorporate other bespoke monitoring into Foglight would have made the tool even more useful.""The version compatibility needs work.""The “cartridge” concept for every little thing is a bit of a bother to implement.""I want to see mobile access application in the next release.""My only complaint from Foglight for monitoring is that you only get a plot for five minute average for metrics like CPU and Memory, on the application side I can see metrics more quickly at 15 seconds for metrics like active sessions, heap. I would like to see the same for CPU and memory.""I think installation and setup needs little more improvement especially when you are installing with external database.""I would perhaps like to see more SSMS connections.""We are running a Webmethods stack (Software AG) and Foglight is unable to instrument. We are in a POC with Dynatrace and it was able to instrument with little effort."

More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."
  • "Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."
  • "Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."
  • "Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."
  • More Avada Software Infrared360 Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I recall it being a very expensive solution relative to function and stability."
  • "The price is expensive for us."
  • "Foglight can be expensive I would go with the pricing at a three year deal."
  • "Since the product split – the licensing is a bit more complex."
  • More Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    246
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Unranked
    In Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Infrared360
    Foglight, Dell Foglight
    Learn More
    Avada Software
    Video Not Available
    Quest Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    Avada Software specializes in Enterprise Middleware solutions. Founded by some pioneers in SOA, MQ and J2EE technology, Avada’s Flagship product, Infrared360, is a holistic & innovative private cloud enabled portal providing self-service administration, monitoring, load testing, auditing & statistical reporting for Enterprise Middleware including IBM’s middleware stack of MQ, IIB (message broker), WAS, and Datapower, as well as other applications servers such as  JBoss, TC Server, Weblogic, and other messaging technologies such as Tibco EMS and Kafka*.

    Accessed via any web browser on any device, Infrared360 is a single web application, yet scales to 2500+ endpoints without deploying anything (no agents, no scripts) to those endpoints.

    Using trusted ‘spaces’ and delegated visibility and control, the portal uniquely provides different business units or even different application users virtual ‘spaces’ in which to work.  Within those spaces are only the objects and resources the user has been granted visibility.  Role policy dictates permissions on those resources.

    It is the ONLY Enterprise Messaging Solution with a built in SOA engine that lets you leverage internal and external services for managing and correcting problems within your middleware messaging environment.                 

      *Kafka coming soon 

    Manage your application infrastructure by monitoring the IT components that affect application performance.
    Sample Customers
    USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin,  Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others
    Anji Automotive Logistics, Unimat, Priceline.com
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm73%
    Government27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Insurance Company11%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Transportation Company6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm44%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Educational Organization11%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise79%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise30%
    Large Enterprise57%
    Buyer's Guide
    Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 71st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8, while Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams. ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] writes "We evaluated other options including BMC, but chose Foglight for it's notifications & the ability to review the history". Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace, whereas Quest Foglight for APM [EOL] is most compared with Catchpoint.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.