Aurea CX Messenger vs IBM MQ vs VMware RabbitMQ comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
403 views|117 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
14,445 views|9,682 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
VMware Logo
6,067 views|5,276 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aurea CX Messenger, IBM MQ, and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software.
To learn more, read our detailed Message Queue (MQ) Software Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Radhey Rajput
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The features that I have found most valuable are that it is very easy to develop. Most of it is graphical, but we also have the option to add any custom call that you need.""The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.""The solution is highly scalable, this is very important for us. It can handle a lot of messages.""ESB: Provides all kind of possibilities to resolve business needs. A lot of ready to use services plus custom Java services. I used a lot of them all.""SDM: User-friendly tool which allows for a seamless approach to performing hotfixes, if required.""The solution offers excellent stability."

More Aurea CX Messenger Pros →

"RabbitMQ and Kafka require more steps for setup than IBM MQ. Installation of the IBM product is very simple.""The solution is very stable.""Has helped integrate between applications, reduce rework, and costs by reusing working components of existing applications.""IBM MQ is the right choice because of the stability and the performance. And from the support perspective, it's enough to have a really small team.""IBM is still adding some features and coding some other systems on the security end. However, it has the most security features I've seen in a communication solution. Security is the most important thing for our purposes.""Assists with our apps and has great message processing.""The usability of the solution is very good.""There are a lot of extensible options for security, i.e., various things you can do. It's pretty easy to navigate."

More IBM MQ Pros →

"After creating a RabbitMQ service, they provide you with a sort of web management dashboard.""Some of the most valuable features are publish and subscribe, fanout, and queues.""Simple and straightforward admin portals: Made it easy for users and worked out excellently for our requirements""The security is great.""Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room.""Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities""We use VMware RabbitMQ to transfer information from one point to another.""The solution's best feature is its exceptional speed, delivering efficient utilization of resources."

More VMware RabbitMQ Pros →

Cons
"It should include/add more services with the product as per market demand. It should include custom Java services developed by any organization or provide a platform where users/developers can share ideas/custom services, etc.""You should not hurry with upgrades without testing the whole product completely.""Aurea CX Messenger could improve by making better use of the new APIs""The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services.""The solution needs to improve support for new, more recent protocols on the API.""I don't know if the last version has the cloud option, but maybe that could be good. That could be something that is included."

More Aurea CX Messenger Cons →

"The integration capabilities could be even easier.""It is expensive. The cost is high. There should be more improvement in the new age of technologies.""The monitoring could be improved. It's a pain to monitor the throughput through the MQ. The maximum throughput for a queue or single channel isn't clear. We could also use some professional services by IBM to assess and tune the performance.""The user interface should be enhanced to include more monitoring features and other metrics. The metrics should include not only those from the IBM MQ point of view but also CPU and memory utilization.""Should have more integration in the monitoring tools.""The GUI part could be better.""I would like to see message duplication included.""The product does not allow users to access data from API or external networks since it can only be used in a closed network, making it an area where improvements are required."

More IBM MQ Cons →

"I’d like this dashboard to use web sockets, so it would actually be in real time. It would slightly increase debugging, etc.""I was struggling with installing a few things. It would be good if was somewhat similar to RedHat. There should be more documentation regarding installation troubleshooting.""We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud.""They should improve on the ability to scale your queues in a very simple and elegant way with the same power that they have would be great.""When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use.""I would like to see the performance of the administration portal improved and additional messaging protocols.""If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic.""The fact that a single queue can't be distributed across multiple instances/nodes is a major disadvantage."

More VMware RabbitMQ Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Much better than Oracle SOA Suite."
  • "You pay nothing for licensing, because the commercial model is a subscription. Other environments, such as QA and Development, are included in the subscription"
  • "The pricing is not so high."
  • More Aurea CX Messenger Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It's super expensive, so ask them if they can consolidate some other licensing costs. But, IBM is IBM, so I guess we'll pay for it."
  • "IBM MQ has a flexible license model based on the Processor Value Unit (PVU) and I recommend it."
  • "Use the new and lightweight version (Liberty) to lower licensing costs. It is also easier to upgrade/maintain."
  • "I think the pricing is reasonable, especially with IIB as a part of it."
  • "Pricing could be better, as with all IBM products. But their performance in production, along with security and scalability, will pay returns in the long run."
  • "99.999 percent availability for less than a penny per message over the past 25 years. IBM MQ is the cheapest software in the IBM software portfolio, and it is one of the best."
  • "IBM MQ appliance has pricing options, but they are costly."
  • "In terms of cost, IBM MQ is slightly on the higher side."
  • More IBM MQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The pricing is okay."
  • "This is an open source solution."
  • "are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."
  • "The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."
  • "The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."
  • "It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."
  • "It is an open-source product."
  • More VMware RabbitMQ Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Queue (MQ) Software solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The Messenger Broker is a really good feature.
    Top Answer:The pricing is not so high. I will rate it a seven out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the highest. There are… more »
    Top Answer:The improvement is that it should be on the cloud and use web services because the earlier version is not using web… more »
    Top Answer:Hi As someone with 45+ years of experience in the Transaction and Message Processing world, I have seen many "MQ"… more »
    Top Answer:Apache Kafka is open source and can be used for free. It has very good log management and has a way to store the data… more »
    Top Answer:IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure.
    Top Answer:We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    403
    Comparisons
    117
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    456
    Rating
    9.0
    Views
    14,445
    Comparisons
    9,682
    Reviews
    21
    Average Words per Review
    452
    Rating
    8.5
    Views
    6,067
    Comparisons
    5,276
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    454
    Rating
    8.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CX Messenger Enterprise, Aurea Sonic ESB, Aurea Sonic, Aurea Sonic MQ
    WebSphere MQ
    RabbitMQ by Pivotal, Rabbit, RabbitMQ
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Overview

    CX Messenger lets your technology keep pace with your business. Aurea’s industry leading Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) lets you adapt and change your infrastructure with plug-and-play speed and ease.

      IBM MQ is a middleware product used to send or exchange messages across multiple platforms, including applications, systems, files, and services via MQs (messaging queues). This solution helps simplify the creation of business applications, and also makes them easier to maintain. IBM MQ is security-rich, has high performance, and provides a universal messaging backbone with robust connectivity. In addition, it also integrates easily with existing IT assets by using an SOA (service oriented architecture).

      IBM MQ can be deployed:

      • On-premises
      • In the cloud
      • Hybrid cloud

      IBM MQ supports the following APIs:

      • MQI (Message Queue Interface)
      • REST
      • .NET
      • MQTT
      • JMS
      • IBM MQ Light


      IBM MQ Features

      Some of the most powerful IBM MQ features include:

      • High availability
      • Stability and scalability
      • Flexible deployment options
      • Uniform clusters
      • Automated and intelligent workload balancing
      • Broad language, API, and messaging protocol support
      • Administrative features that simplify messaging management
      • Open standards development tools
      • Simple management tools

      IBM MQ Benefits

      Some of the benefits of using IBM MQ include:

      • Multi-style messaging: IBM MQ supports simple multi-style messaging, making it easy to connect diverse systems with support for message queuing, transactions, and more.

      • Reduced risk: With IBM MQ you will never lose a message, and messages are never delivered more than once.

      • Cloud-native: Because IBM MQ has a minimal infrastructure, it is suitable to be cloud-native, and therefore has the capability to always remain on.

      • Available anywhere: Using IBM MQ, you have access to secure messaging anywhere, at any time.

      • Secure: IBM MQ makes sure to keep your data safe by using TLS secured communications, providing access identity management, message-level security, and more measures to protect your information.

      • Easy for application programmers: To use IBM MQ, application programmers do not need to have any knowledge of communications programming.

      • Technical support: IBM MQ has a large user community and also provides support 24/7 as needed.

      Reviews from Real Users

      Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by IBM MQ users who are currently using the solution.

      PeerSpot user Sunil S., a manager at a financial services firm, explains that they never lose messages are never lost in transit, mentioning that he can store messages and forward them as required: "Whenever payments are happening, such as incoming payments to the bank, we need to notify the customer. With MQ we can actually do that asynchronously. We don't want to notify the customer for each and every payment but, rather, more like once a day. That kind of thing can be enabled with the help of MQ."

      Another PeerSpot reviewer, Luis L. who is a solutions director at Thesys Technologies, says that IBM MQ is a valuable solution and is "A stable and reliable software that offers good integration between different systems."

      The head of operations at a financial services firm notes that "I have found the solution to be very robust. It has a strong reputation, is easy to use, simple to configure in our enterprise software, and supports all the protocols that we use."

      In addition, a Software Engineer at a financial services firm praises the security benefits of it and states that “it has the most security features I've seen in a communication solution. Security is the most important thing for our purposes."

    RabbitMQ is the most popular open source message broker, with more than 35,000 production deployments world-wide. RabbitMQ is lightweight and easy to deploy on premises and in the cloud and runs on all major operating systems. It supports most developer platforms, multiple messaging protocols and can be deployed in distributed and federated configurations to meet high-scale, high-availability requirements.

    Sample Customers
    Heathrow, HomeServe, Paypal, Freedom Mortgage
    Deutsche Bahn, Bon-Ton, WestJet, ARBURG, Northern Territory Government, Tata Steel Europe, Sharp Corporation
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Insurance Company6%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm39%
    Retailer10%
    Insurance Company9%
    Computer Software Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm37%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company26%
    Retailer16%
    University11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise61%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business9%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise82%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business45%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise45%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise71%
    Buyer's Guide
    Message Queue (MQ) Software
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.