AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs Ixia Hawkeye comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
AppDynamics Logo
1,100 views|897 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Keysight Technologies Logo
401 views|282 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AppDynamics Server Monitoring and Ixia Hawkeye based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs. Ixia Hawkeye Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product has the ability to drill down to the errors whenever we have issues.""It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I don't see any problems in the solution...The solution's technical support was good.""Setting up the monitoring agents was straightforward.""What I like most about AppDynamics Server Monitoring is that it's easy to manipulate and easy to implement. All solutions have the same features, but what sets AppDynamics Server Monitoring apart is that it's really quick to implement. AppDynamics Server Monitoring has a great interface. As a developer, it doesn't matter whether it's SolarWinds, Dynatrace, or any APM you're using, but it would matter to the customer. A product must be easy to manipulate or use, for example, AppDynamics Server Monitoring, for the customer, but for developers like my team, there's no pressure, even if a solution requires coding.""The auto-discovery of the logs is the most valuable feature. It requires minimal configuration, we just need to set up on once and it automatically detects through the code.""We can view the server activities, including issues in the process, with a single click.""I like Business iQ the most, so far. It has great analytics configurations and I can get real-time updates. We have eCommerce releases every week. So the one use case that I use Business iQ is to compare before and after release performance using AppDynamics.""The solution offers great visibility that allows you to track where errors originated."

More AppDynamics Server Monitoring Pros →

"It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.""Our customer was happiest with the price of this product.""The most valuable feature is the deployment because it's very easy to deploy real flow through the network.""The ease of setup is the most valuable aspect of this solution. It's easy to set up and run tests."

More Ixia Hawkeye Pros →

Cons
"The product’s dashboard could be more easy to implement.""The solution has performance issues after we deploy the agent.""The configuration is tricky and requires a lot of tools.""I could not find a user-friendly interface for querying, and analytics sometimes gives the wrong results...I feel that analytics could have been better in searching and running the analytical queries.""The solution could be more mobile friendly.""The one thing that I find it difficult in using AppDynamics is, for any new user, it's not easy for him or her to configure the transactions in AppDynamics because the UI is pretty complex. The configuration is pretty complex for a new, fresh user. They can make the UI simpler, that'll be very helpful for anyone to configure their website in AppDynamics.""An area for improvement in AppDynamics Server Monitoring is integration; in particular, it needs a better way to integrate with custom applications such as Siebel CRM. Right now, it's challenging to integrate AppDynamics Server Monitoring with Siebel CRM because it sometimes gives an error and cannot integrate properly.""Things are being done differently in the industry now, and many of these problems are being solved with cloud databases."

More AppDynamics Server Monitoring Cons →

"You can't delete more than one thing at a time. It would be great to be able to highlight three out of five things and delete them, whether it's a test or an actual report.""The customization of tests and even the results can be improved.""Improvements in network performance are essential.""Ixia has one flaw, which is that they do not print the license code on the paper licenses that are shipped to the customers."

More Ixia Hawkeye Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "My understanding is that the price of this solution is quite high, compared to other products."
  • "The pricing for AppDynamics Server Monitoring in Africa and the Middle East is too expensive, so it's very hard to sell it to customers. If there could be different pricing or package for the region, that would be great. My company pays for the license of AppDynamics Server Monitoring on a per-agent, per-server basis. It's $700 to $1000 per server, and it's paid annually. My company is on a subscription model for the solution. On a scale of one to five, where one is expensive and five is cheap, my rating for the price of AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a two."
  • "The solution has a high cost."
  • "AppDynamics Server Monitoring is a very expensive product, but if you negotiate well, you get value for money...My company used to make early payments toward the licensing costs of the solution, but now my company has opted for a different licensing model."
  • "The tool is expensive."
  • More AppDynamics Server Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It cost us approximately 25,000 for two years. This is cheaper than ThousandEyes."
  • "In larger networks, the costs for licenses tend to be more reasonable, but for smaller networks, it appears relatively costly."
  • More Ixia Hawkeye Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The platform is reliable in identifying the core system issues.
    Top Answer:It's true; it's not an inexpensive solution. Dynatrace and AppDynamics are consistently on the pricier side. However, when comparing with other solutions like Datadog or New Relic, it becomes apparent… more »
    Top Answer:If we consider the implementation of alternative solutions, such as Dynatrace, there is a notable difference in the approach to agent-based service monitoring. For instance, Dynatrace employs a… more »
    Top Answer:It empowers network administrators to access specialized and detailed views for specific tests, including video streaming and performance related to specific applications like video games.
    Top Answer:Improvements in network performance are essential.
    Top Answer:Our objective is to evaluate the performance of GPON and DOCSIS networks which involves considering factors such as pricing, sales, and the technical aspects of conducting tests. To achieve this… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    1,100
    Comparisons
    897
    Reviews
    10
    Average Words per Review
    524
    Rating
    8.2
    Views
    401
    Comparisons
    282
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    475
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Application-centric server monitoring in context of your business transactions to proactively isolate and resolve application performance issues faster with actionable, correlated application-server metrics.

    Hawkeye quickly and effectively validates network performance, isolates problems, and proactively detects issues by running scheduled verification tests. Using a combination of hardware and software agents called Performance Endpoints, Hawkeye simulates application traffic and sends key performance metrics to a central console for fast action.
    Sample Customers
    Sony, DirecTV, UBS, The Container Store, The Neta Porter Group, Nasdaq, Cisco, eHarmony, Hallmark, Overstock, Expedia
    EMA
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm27%
    Retailer18%
    Transportation Company9%
    Hospitality Company9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Computer Software Company18%
    Media Company6%
    Government5%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm20%
    Computer Software Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise67%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%
    Buyer's Guide
    AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs. Ixia Hawkeye
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs. Ixia Hawkeye and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AppDynamics Server Monitoring is ranked 19th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 16 reviews while Ixia Hawkeye is ranked 46th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 4 reviews. AppDynamics Server Monitoring is rated 8.2, while Ixia Hawkeye is rated 9.2. The top reviewer of AppDynamics Server Monitoring writes "A highly stable and scalable solution that provides real-time information on servers". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ixia Hawkeye writes "A valuable tool for optimizing network performance and security with comprehensive network monitoring capabilities, user-friendly interface, and flexibility for scripting". AppDynamics Server Monitoring is most compared with OpsRamp, Zabbix, ITRS Geneos, Nutanix Prism and PRTG Network Monitor, whereas Ixia Hawkeye is most compared with ThousandEyes, Gigamon Deep Observability Pipeline and NETSCOUT nGeniusONE. See our AppDynamics Server Monitoring vs. Ixia Hawkeye report.

    See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

    We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.