We performed a comparison between Amazon Macie and Zscaler DLP based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool gives confidence that our configuration is safe."
"The tool's performance is good."
"As a cloud-based service, it is very easily implemented."
"Its impressive scalability allows the combination of multiple dictionaries and using them as one engine, resulting in narrower data loss gaps."
"The UI is easy to use."
"The policies are very easy to implement."
"The most valuable aspect of Zscaler Cloud DLP is its automatic DLP feature."
"On DLP terms, Zscaler Cloud DLP ensures that data doesn't go outside of the organization. So on the network level, Zscaler does a pretty good job."
"You can close your data protection gaps with Zscaler. You can quickly find all the classified, sensitive data across the cloud."
"It is a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Amazon Macie is expensive."
"We have issues with the tool's maintenance and networking. It should be able to work in offline mode as well."
"Price-wise, it is a costly product and it should be reduced."
"Another area of improvement is implementation through non-client connectors. The solution can be implemented in two ways. One uses the back file; the other one uses client connectors. So the client connector is pretty fast, but when it comes to non-client connectors and procedures, it's kind of delayed and slow."
"There could be a feature to view the VPN tunnel activities in terms of configuration."
"The product must allow users to check logs for an entire year in the local console."
"On the improvement side, when we bypass certain internet traffic types, it's currently recommended to have a one-click option, but audio and video aren't always supported. Thus, we need to bypass that kind of traffic. So, it is an area of improvement."
"The tool must provide IP-blocking features."
"There could be additional ways to define proximity. Additionally, they should provide some exclusion options for specific policies and an ability to control the DLP engine."
Amazon Macie is ranked 19th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 2 reviews while Zscaler DLP is ranked 4th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 15 reviews. Amazon Macie is rated 6.6, while Zscaler DLP is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Amazon Macie writes "The solution's performance is good but needs improvement in pricing". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zscaler DLP writes "Provides a range of security measures to protect network traffic". Amazon Macie is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention and Trend Micro Integrated Data Loss Prevention, whereas Zscaler DLP is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform and CoSoSys Endpoint Protector. See our Amazon Macie vs. Zscaler DLP report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.