Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) vs Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
447 views|315 comparisons
93% willing to recommend
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
5,982 views|5,152 comparisons
89% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
5,971 views|4,883 comparisons
97% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store), Amazon S3 Glacier, and Microsoft Azure File Storage based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage.
To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Storage Report (Updated: April 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The tool has different types of volumes, like SSD and HDD.""The most valuable feature of the solution is backup...Amazon EBS is a very good product since it is very easy to enhance or increase and migrate your servers immediately, in a matter of seconds.""When I have to change the operating system or delete a host, I can store the data in EBS or assign it to another host.""Amazon EBS is a storage system, and the storage is attached to the servers.""The solution provides big space that is reasonably priced.""The durability and snapshot capabilities are good.""The product's initial setup phase was easy to manage.""One of the most valuable was snapshots. There were scenarios in which the whole EC2 crashed, or we were unable to use it for some time, but the data on the mounted volumes were crucial to us. So, at that time, snapshots were very helpful."

More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Pros →

"AWS Lambda is the most valuable part of the solution because it gives you a code interface for everything.""The product is easy to use.""Amazon S3 Glacier can integrate seamlessly with other AWS services.""We save money with the product.""The solution is easy to use.""It is a very comprehensive tool.""I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each designated bucket. In terms of value, I would say that the tool gets the job done in a simpler manner.""The solution is stable."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Pros →

"The solution is easy to use.""The immutable storage features are valuable.""It was easy to set up.""Very user-friendly and intuitive.""The initial setup is straightforward and takes approximately twenty minutes.""Its most valuable features are speed and security.""My client had zero data loss while using the solution for backups and file security.""It is a very scalable solution. I rate the solution's scalability a nine out of ten."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pros →

Cons
"It would be good if the solution added a button to increase the size and make the EC2 machine recognize the increased capacity of the EBS.""The features could be improved.""The initial setup is not easy.""The product data encryption feature needs improvement.""The setup could be easier.""Amazon EBS performs well but it could improve.""I think performance can be improved.""There is room for improvement in terms of file storage. Recently, we had a scenario in which, in a file share, we had increased the IOPS capacity; this was for the production environment."

More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Cons →

"The product takes more time to secure data when the bandwidth is low.""Although Amazon S3 Glacier is cheap, its data retrieval cost is very high compared to other solutions.""The solution’s deployment process is complex and could be improved.""Their pricing structure is always a big topic. It's so difficult to understand.""They should increase the data limit for the free version or reduce the price.""There is room for improvement in handling GDPR compliance better. GDPR is about personal data protection and retention. It would be great if S3 Glacier could handle compliance items related to this, especially with upcoming legislation like the California law, which restricts data storage time and allows users to request data deletion.""Amazon S3 Glacier is a cheaper tool if you're running it on-prem, but it is expensive if deployed on the cloud.""The product is difficult to use."

More Amazon S3 Glacier Cons →

"The provider needs to collect more information about the products.""Sometimes it takes very long to refresh the information.""In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity.""I have had issues migrating my data to another subscription.""The product must provide better security functions.""The storage account key could be a security issue.""The pricing and technical support could be better.""If the file is large, there may be a delay in download time."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "What I want Amazon to do is lower the price."
  • "The solution is reasonably priced."
  • "On a scale of one to ten, where one is low price, and ten is high, I rate the price a seven."
  • "The product is low-priced than other solutions."
  • "It is a cost-effective solution."
  • "You need to pay additional costs for support."
  • "The pricing models may be for general purposes, such as Amazon EBS Provisioned IOPS Volume or Amazon EBS Cold HDD Volumes."
  • "The solution is quite costly."
  • More Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is much cheaper than competing products."
  • "There is no license, you pay for what you use."
  • "The solution is cost-effective."
  • "The product is cheap."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is expensive."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is a cost-effective solution for archiving."
  • "The pricing must be improved."
  • "Amazon S3 Glacier is very cheap, but the cost becomes a concern when you have a very large amount of data."
  • More Amazon S3 Glacier Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."
  • "One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
  • "The price is comparable to other competitive solutions."
  • "There are fewer hidden costs involved compared to other solutions, and when our customer is already a Microsoft partner, they typically have access to more affordable fees."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
  • "I give the pricing of the solution a seven out of ten."
  • "One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."
  • "Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
  • More Microsoft Azure File Storage Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Storage solutions are best for your needs.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether Amazon's S3 Glacier or Elastic Block Store data storage… more »
    Top Answer:The durability and snapshot capabilities are good.
    Top Answer:The solution is quite costly. There was an instance when we were not using 50 volumes. They were available and were… more »
    Top Answer:I like creating buckets where data can be segregated at a high level and then routing the appropriate data to each… more »
    Top Answer:I believe the usage reporting could be simplified, particularly for billing purposes. Overall, I find Amazon S3… more »
    Top Answer:I use the solution for storage. We use it for application data storage and retrieval and for data backup. It has various… more »
    Top Answer:Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to… more »
    Ranking
    9th
    out of 52 in Cloud Storage
    Views
    447
    Comparisons
    315
    Reviews
    14
    Average Words per Review
    451
    Rating
    8.7
    Views
    5,982
    Comparisons
    5,152
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    360
    Rating
    8.6
    Views
    5,971
    Comparisons
    4,883
    Reviews
    31
    Average Words per Review
    400
    Rating
    8.2
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Glacier
    MS Azure File Storage
    Learn More
    Overview

    Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) provides persistent block level storage volumes for use with Amazon EC2 instances in the AWS Cloud.  Each Amazon EBS volume is automatically replicated within its Availability Zone to protect you from component failure, offering high availability and durability. Amazon EBS volumes offer the consistent and low-latency performance needed to run your workloads. With Amazon EBS, you can scale your usage up or down within minutes – all while paying a low price for only what you provision.

    Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost cloud storage service for data archiving and long-term backup. Customers can reliably store large or small amounts of data for as little as $0.007 per gigabyte per month, a significant savings compared to on-premises solutions. To keep costs low, Amazon Glacier is optimized for infrequently accessed data where a retrieval time of several hours is suitable.

    Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

    Key scenarios:

    • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
    • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
    • Integrate modern applications with File storage
    • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data
    Sample Customers
    Bazaar Voice, Crowd Strike, Adobe, Gamevil, Hess, CopperEgg, TotalJobs Group, SuperCell, Dropcam, Unilever
    King Cpunty, Illumina, Backupify, Nearmap.com, Scribd, Baylor College of Medicine, SoundCloud
    Talon, Camden
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization47%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company6%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company42%
    Financial Services Firm17%
    Recruiting/Hr Firm8%
    Insurance Company4%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization29%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Financial Services Firm6%
    Comms Service Provider6%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Construction Company19%
    Manufacturing Company13%
    Computer Software Company13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm10%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business50%
    Midsize Enterprise25%
    Large Enterprise25%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise54%
    Large Enterprise35%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business58%
    Midsize Enterprise16%
    Large Enterprise26%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise37%
    Large Enterprise44%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business41%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise41%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business23%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    Cloud Storage
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about NetApp, Google, Nasuni and others in Cloud Storage. Updated: April 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.