We performed a comparison between Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] and Zapier based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."There were no concerns with the stability. This product is very good from a stability perspective."
"Zapier is a really good tool for connecting multiple different platforms and data sources. For example, with Quickbase, I can easily integrate data from other sources like AWS or task-tracking platforms such as ClickUp or Asana."
"The ability to connect web applications to trigger actions in another app after having enriched, formatted, delayed, grouped, and filtered is really valuable for many businesses."
"Zapier handles everything under the sun that you would think you need in automation. It is the most mature integration platform and service on the market."
"Zapier is user friendly and makes it easy to integrate different tools. It has a drag and drop functionality which makes it easy to connect environments."
"The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is very intuitive and has a very flat learning curve."
"The product's initial setup phase was very easy."
"The connection between Facebook lead forms and MailChimp integrations is the most valuable feature."
"We find it effortless to set up. We really don't have to do anything other than finding the application in the Zapier catalog. And as long as the application has been re-integrated into Zapier, they're able to then just provide the connection details and hook it up."
"I am not sure if there are various connectors available in the recent version of Pervasive DI to support the wide range of sources available (e.g., big data, cloud, EME)."
"The solution does not work properly when we apply filters and we get errors."
"I would like to see them improve the Quickbase integration. Currently, it only allows triggering actions when records are added, but it would be more useful if we could also trigger actions when records are modified or deleted."
"System-to-system is fine, but when it comes to system-to-user, where Zapier is helping to communicate to a user, that's a one-way communication. If that user has to perform some action on that notification, the action isn't handled by Zapier. So there's no way to orchestrate that and it's very cumbersome."
"It could support various languages along with Python."
"The pricing of the solution is quite expensive."
"With Zapier, improvements are required in the areas of concerns like bugs, ease of use, and documentation."
"Zapier could be a little faster, but that might not be possible. I would encourage Zapier to make more API endpoints for each application"
"After mapping them out, and they'd worked for a while, I've had Zapier fail."
Earn 20 points
Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Cloud Data Integration while Zapier is ranked 10th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews. Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is rated 5.8, while Zapier is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] writes "You can use it to send data back and forth between Salesforce.com and JD Edwards". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Zapier writes "A tool for automation purposes requiring an easy initial setup while offering a very helpful technical support team ". Actian Pervasive Data Integrator [EOL] is most compared with , whereas Zapier is most compared with AWS Glue, Alteryx Designer, Tray.io, Coefficient and MuleSoft Composer.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
