Cloudflare One Reviews

We use the product to access applications that are restricted to employees only. 

Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform removes the risk of exposing the applications to the public. 

Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform needs to improve its documentation. It took time to do the implementation. 

I have been using the product since January. 

I rate the solution's stability a ten out of ten. 

I rate the product's scalability a ten out of ten. 

Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's deployment can be complex if the documentation doesn't cover the use cases. 

Cloudflare Zero Trust Platform's pricing is good. 

I rate the product a nine out of ten. 

I use the solution for scrubbing internet-based traffic that comes toward a particular company’s data center. The traffic is directed to Cloudflare first. Cloudflare does the traffic scrubbing and sends the clean traffic toward the company's data center.

I have worked with many DDoS solutions. Cloudflare is by far the most effective solution that I have come across. It is really good. The product’s signatures are good. The people in the accounting and technical management teams are nice. Support is also good.

Operating and tuning the product is difficult.

I have been using the solution for almost one and a half years.

The tool is pretty much stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the scalability a nine out of ten. The solution has a huge customer base. In our organization, 10,000 people are using the solution.

When we often face issues with the service, we contact the support team. The team is really good. However, support could be improved.

The onboarding process was pretty simple.

We deployed the product two years ago. We took a couple of months to deploy it.

If someone wants to set up a DDoS solution for the first time, they should choose Cloudflare. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

We use the solution to protect some of the services. It helps us protect our applications and infrastructure.

The solution is user-friendly in terms of graphical interface and is easy to deploy.

Our subscription plan for the solution has a limitation of bot signatures.

It is a stable solution.

It is an in-built tool in our Cloudflare infrastructure, and we use it as a DNS service. Thus, we don't necessarily have to configure it. We add it as a service, and it works great for us.

The solution is excellent. It helped us a lot with DDoS issues. I rate it a ten out of ten.

I mostly use Cloudflare Access for protecting some specific areas of my website, specifically public access. So I can do it using two-factor authentication. So it only allows some registered emails to access that part of my website.

For Cloudflare Access, I am using the free plan. So they are allowing 50 users to use it together. So we can say it is not only for personal use but also beneficial for a small team of fifty people. We can use it in a small company or startup also.

The most valuable feature is their protection. Also, its custom rule set is something we can use to specify whether we want to allow a user to access a specific application-specific software.

I'm just a beginner in Cloudcare Access. So I have used their basic functionality. So, I didn't find any issue with their basic functionalities.

They don't have a person to provide support for customers using the solution under their free plan. So, the aforementioned area can be considered for improvement.

I have been using Cloudflare Access for three to four months. I'm using Cloudera Access for my personal use.

I haven't contacted technical support.

The solution is deployed on the cloud. So, it is mainly deployed on Cloudflare infrastructure. We can use that to protect our application or step on our own server or any software as a service application.

They have Web2py, which we can use for setup. But before that, we have to add the domain we want to protect with Cloudflare Access to Cloudflare DNS. So I want to say that before using Cloudflare Access for a specific domain, we have to add them to Cloudflare DNS. Only then can we use Cloudflare Access.

Whether to use the solution or not will depend on your requirements. For basic security, we all have already implemented a password and a username on our website. But nowadays, it is possible to crack passwords because of modern computation. So, if we want to secure our services, it is really good to add a two-factor authentication using Cloud Access to improve security.

Without adding any manual code or any more software to our servers, I can easily implement zero trust Cloudflare Access, which is because of their simple UI, by just adding my domain and specifying a role. So it's easy.

I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten.

Access provides remote access to RDP, FSH, and security camera websites.

I work from two locations and Access enables me to work from both. It's feature-rich and user-friendly. 

It's a little difficult to implement although that has nothing to do with the product. 

I've been using this solution for two years. 

Access has always been stable. 

I haven't tried scaling this solution. 

You need to know a lot about networking to implement the solution but that has nothing to do with the product itself. 

This is a very affordable solution. 

I recommend this product, it's probably the best thing out there, especially if you're already a software customer. I rate Access nine out of 10. 

I am not a reseller, but an implementer. We help our customers utilize this solution.

Cloudflare Access is primarily used in government homage for DDoS protection.

We decided to use Cloudflare Access to solve a problem with DDoS protection.

It covered the things that we needed at the time.

The pricing is an area that can be improved. Pricing, as far as I recall, was the source of our problems.

I have been working with Cloudflare Access for the last 12 months. I am working with a company that has many customers in different areas, and we have absolutely used Cloudflare for some of them.

I became familiar with Cloudflare Access four years ago.

Cloudflare Access is a stable solution.

Cloudflare Access is scalable.

I especially remember that we got great support.

I would absolutely rate the support a five out of five, they helped us a lot.

Positive

It's been a while, but I don't recall any problems with setting it up.

At the time, it was me and two other technicians to manage this solution.

The prices are slightly expensive.

I evaluate many things to educate myself in the work that I am doing.

We have used others as well, but I think that they are pretty comparable to other solutions that are available. Cloudflare, in my opinion, was easy to implement.

It was very good, I would rate Cloudflare Access an eight out of ten.

Cloudflare is simple to use.

Cloudflare is similar to a toolbox. It's simple to handle the box, but it's a different story when it comes to handling the tools. The same is true for Amazon. That is true for all companies. The majority of them have it. They will sell you a toolbox, but you must know how to use it.

Cloudflare isn't all bad. We have customers who are getting rid of Imperva because they can't find anyone who knows anything about it. Our customers no longer use Cloudflare because its service is subpar.

There's another company, Sucuri, that has excellent customer support, but you don't buy it because you don't want to talk to customer support. Customer support is not something you want to purchase. You're supposed to buy something without requiring customer support, which is the main point.

The same goes for Fortinet. While I am not familiar with the machine, it can cost a lot of money sometimes, $300,000 for a medium-sized business. Furthermore, you will require a full-time employee in your office who is knowledgeable. Dependent on the skill level today's resources can range from 80 to 150.

You don't want to pay. The price tag is no longer $200,000, but rather $300,000 to $400,000. It's twice.

The industry is changing right now. There is artificial intelligence. You have blockchain, and Quantum is on the way. It's there and on its way. So there is a significant shift in that area, of cyber security.

And, on top of that, there is a global shortage of 3.5 million security experts or professionals.

You are not an expert in your first year. People believe they are experts because they have a certification or something similar. Experts do not behave in this manner. Expert in dealing with a crisis. To become an expert, you must go through many crises. However, people are now claiming to be experts simply because they can scan something.

I would rate Cloudflare DDoS a seven out of ten.

We use the product to mitigate the security risk of dynamic DDoS attacks. In these attacks, millions of requests come from millions of different IPs to get our server down. If we do not have a security solution to mitigate this risk, the service for other users will be down. The server will be down due to the huge consumption of resources.

The solution has different options that can be used to differentiate DDoS attacks. Cloudflare has a user agent, which can be used to define rules. If I do not want MacBook users to access the system, I can use the user agent to drop the traffic for MacBook users. It is very valuable. It helps me mitigate risks.

The product gives us many tools to mitigate risks. It is one of the most powerful solutions on the cloud. The documentation is good.

The onboarding process can be improved a little bit.

I have been using the solution for nine months.

I did not face any stability issues in the past nine months.

I recently contacted support to get more information about certain attacks. I wanted to get a full report about an incident, and they sent me all the details I needed.

Positive

The initial setup is not complex at all. It is too simple.

We just have to integrate the node IP address of AWS and change the public IP as a DNS record. Then, Cloudflare will send all the data after mitigating any risk to AWS. The deployment takes five to seven business days. We need one or two engineers for the security part of the deployment. For testing and services, we need a team.

It is a cloud solution. We have integrated it with Amazon AWS. Sometimes we can't mitigate the DDoS attacks using AWS WAF. It doesn’t detect the attacks. AWS WAF does not have some options to differentiate the type of attacks.

I use the tool only as a DDoS solution. I just use the DDoS service to protect myself. There's no scalability for this option. Documents already exist for all the cloud solutions. I wouldn’t prefer an automated solution for integration because apps are built based on customers’ requirements. The requirements differ, so the default profile for automation can't fit all the customers. Overall, I rate the product a nine and a half or ten out of ten.