The primary use case of this solution is for the core and distribution layers.
It's used for normal switching and access. We are only using it with the data center model to have a distribution layer, core layer, and access layer.
The primary use case of this solution is for the core and distribution layers.
It's used for normal switching and access. We are only using it with the data center model to have a distribution layer, core layer, and access layer.
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches are pretty good overall.
There is a lot of competition between Cisco, Juniper, and other switches such as Extreme. Our IT team is comfortable with Cisco switches, but the only problem is that there are many different versions of software that can be used across different platforms of Cisco, and normally with other vendors, we have a unified software that is running across different platforms, but Cisco does not.
We are expecting one software that can run across all of Cisco hardware, software, and Cisco Switch router, similar to what Juniper has.
They are stable, but not as good as Juniper, they could be improved.
We have been working with Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches for more than 15 years.
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches are stable, but if you are comparing with Juniper, from the routers and switches, Juniper is more stable.
It's a scalable product. In our organization, we have approximately 50 people using it.
We plan to continue using Cisco switches and we are expanding every year.
We have diversity in our network. Usually, we have at least two vendors.
The initial setup was straightforward.
Deployment time depends on the criticality of the location we are installing these boxes. For example, if it is a greenfield, it can take one or two days, and it is a capital location such as a data center it can take some time for measuring and configuration from the old networks to the new network, which would take two or three weeks.
We have a team of many experts who work here.
The deployment team is made up of an engineering team and a deployment team. Also, we have a rollout team for stacking and racking who are technicians.
We did not use a vendor or reseller. We use our experts in our network who have excellent experience with every Cisco product.
I would recommend Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches for anyone who is interested in using this solution.
I would rate Cisco switches a seven out of ten.
I have used it with multiple clients. I have used Linksys Switches for Ethernet in Hotel Regency located in Pakistan, which utilises Linksys switches across its three floors and approximately twenty rooms and Ramada Portal, a four-star hotel, which also employs Cisco switches.
The Linksys Switches offer simplified network management and scalability. These switches can be easily managed with basic networking knowledge without requiring CCNA level expertise for Cisco.
In a previous use case, we deployed Linksys Switches for blocking unwanted signals within a premises with the help of their clean air technology. This was one of the notable advantages of Linksys Switches over Cisco. For SMBs, Cisco and D-Link are a better option. In terms of enterprise-level companies, Cisco is preferred due to its optimisation quality during high traffic. There are many valuable features of Linksys Switches which include speed support and manageability. This makes them comparative with local brands and also much secure due to its security features. In terms of reliability and time, Cisco still ranks higher than its' competitors.
The additional features which I would like to suggest is to implement the user friendly GUI for easier network management. It should also have the functions of automating the firmware upgrade process, thus eliminating the need for technical expertise. Apart from this, I cannot pinpoint any other features that I am missing in the current model.
I have been using Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches for the past 3 to 4 years.
For the price that we pay, it is a stable solution in terms of performance.
It is a scalable solution.
We are offering the support ourselves because we have engineers at different levels for handling various tasks. Level 1 engineer handles simple installations and configurations on site. Level 2 engineers manage more complex setups. Level 3 engineers work on the issues involving routers, VLANs, and terminals. The support also depends on the client's needs. Enterprise level plans might need configuration assistance. We also arrange for parts locally, as well as through import whenever there is a need for one.
The setup process or configuring access points include two types of devices. One of them is a wireless LAN controller, and the other is a stand alone device. Setting up an access point with WLC is simpler because the controller handles the configurations. On the other hand, standalone devices require more manual configuration.
It's our recommendation that training be provided by D-Link for engineers interested in deploying Linksys switches or routers. As for the overall rating, I would rate Cisco Linksys Ethernet switches a 9 out of 10.
We use Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches for Wi-Fi connectivity.
The platform has not improved network performance enough. We encounter issues related to internet connectivity and random disconnection.
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches’s stability and pricing needs improvement.
It is a reliable product. However, after six months, we came across internet connectivity issues. I rate the stability an eight out of ten.
We have 60 Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches users in our organization. It is a scalable platform.
The initial setup is easy. It takes around 15 minutes or a maximum of half an hour to complete.
I implement the product by referring to the documentation available on the internet in case of any technical errors.
The product is expensive.
I rate the product an eight out of ten.
The product can be used for user connectivity.
Cisco products are always stable.
The product’s price is a bit high.
I have deployed the solution for our customers.
The tool is quite stable.
The tool is scalable. In my previous organization, I had a team of 20 engineers. Many of our customers were using the solution.
The support is very good.
The choice of product depends upon the customer’s requirements and budget. If the customer cannot afford Cisco, we may suggest they use D-Link or TP-Link.
The initial setup is straightforward. I'm an expert in Cisco, so I don't have any problem setting it up. The deployment, along with the configuration, would take one hour. If we do not want advanced requirements like management, we can just plug it in, and the users can start working. If it is modular, we need to take care of the modules.
We have to pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution.
The price is the only concern. The product and the support are excellent. I would recommend the solution to others. Cisco must provide a product for users who have low budgets. Overall, I rate the tool a ten out of ten.
I have been using Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches for approximately seven years.
Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches is a stable solution.
The Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches are scalable.
We have approximately six people using the solution.
The support from Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches was not very good prior to 2019. However, the support has improved and is not a problem anymore.
The sales support could improve, they are not supplying the solution on time. For some projects, we have had to wait many months.
The deployment difficulty level of Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches depends on the requirements of the client. If the IT person from the client's side is good the implementation will be fine. If not the implementation will be difficult.
The price of Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches is higher than competitors, such as Huawei.
I rate Cisco Linksys Ethernet Switches a nine out of ten.
We’ve used a lot of the product. We use them for switches.
Their speed and their ability to handle the network well are the most significant aspects of the product. I remember an incident where we bought a different unbranded switch and had many network issues. We had to discard it and buy a Cisco switch. Once some routers and switches from China were installed, the network became very problematic. The only solution was to buy a Cisco switch, replace it, and it was able to handle the network reasonably well, the users and everything. The bandwidth was perfect after replacing those with Cisco. I trust the products from that perspective. They're able to deliver where they promise.
They just need to simplify the learning curve.
We’ve used the solution for about ten years now.
Cisco is number one in terms of stability.
The switches are entirely scalable. They can handle heavy traffic - even with spikes in demand. Definitely, with the spikes during, for example, lunch hour and everybody wanting to connect to the internet, it handles the uptick well, so it's highly scalable. It can handle varying loads.
Over 400 people connect to the network.
We do plan to increase usage.
The tech support is good.
Cisco products require some knowledge of it. Most of them are not plug-and-play. You will have to have some knowledge in configuring them, specific knowledge for them. They're good. However, for advanced setups, even advanced security and everything, it requires somebody knowledgeable in Cisco systems.
Deploying it took a more extended period to set everything up and running, compared to other products, compared, let's say, to other companies, for example, Tenda or Huawei. Compared to a Huawei switch, a Cisco switch will require to take some more time to do the configuration and everything. It took some time to get it perfectly running.
It doesn't require much to maintain. Once they are set up, maintaining them is very easy since they're quite reliable and stable. For us, two people for a company of 400 will handle the network perfectly. We have two network engineers for a company with 400 to 500 people, so that speaks to the stability of their products. They don't need to be micromanaged every now and then.
Most of them, once you buy, is a one-off payment, so you don't have to re-apply year and year, like buying licenses and stuff. Once you buy, that's it. They were quite expensive.
We’re using the latest version of the solution. We had some switches replaced this year; they're the latest version. Our network team keeps them updated, and they do all the security, et cetera, on the firewalls and routers from Cisco.
I can recommend Cisco switches any day.
I would rate Cisco products at nine out of ten.
I primarily use the solution for my personal equipment.
Linksys is quite cheap for private use. Usually people use it in homes or other, for example, in-home setups.
The stability is very good. I like the excellent performance.
The solution is easy to use.
The scalability is great.
It would be ideal if, for private users that are not companies, the solution could be made even cheaper.
I've used the solution for a few years now. I tend to use solutions until they reach end-of-life.
The stability is quite good. That said, a few times, if my computer has some problems with internet connection, I'll restart the modem and restart the router and everything will be up. It's quite good in terms of performance.
The solution can scale well. For me, it works well and I have no complaints.
I haven't had any issues with the solution and therefore have never had the need to reach out to technical support. I cannot speak to thier level of helpfulness or responsiveness.
My Lynksys router is pretty old. I can't recall what I had before, however, if I do need to replace it, I may look to see what else is on the market.
The initial setup is pretty straightforward. i'm a network engineer, and therefore, I don't face any issues. It's not complex at all.
I'm able to set up the solution on my own. I don't need any integrators or consultants to help me.
The solution is extremely inexpensive. It's great for small setups as it doesn't cost too much.
As I just use it for personal use, I do not pay for a commercial license.
Typically, when I need to replace my equipment, I will do some research to find the best technology and rates. My router is now pretty old and I will be looking to evaluate new solutions in the near future.
I'm a customer and an end-user. I don't have a business relationship with the company.
I'd rate the solution at an eight out of ten. I've been quite happy with its capabilities.
I'd recommend the solution to other users.
We are an IT company and we configure these switches for our clients. The environment varies depending on the client and their requirements.
The most valuable features are virtualization and micro-segmentation.
The user interface needs a lot of improvement.
The enterprise-level and data center products need to be improved.
The command-line interface could be more user-friendly.
I have been working with Linksys Ethernet switches for the past 14 years.
Linksys switches are pretty stable.
With respect to scalability, some features such as stacking are missing. Linksys has to work on this technology, especially for a scalable stack. This product is best suited to home users and small offices.
I have never had to contact technical support directly. I have been able to configure these devices using the administration guide.
I have worked with multiple switches from multiple vendors. These include Cisco enterprise-level switches like the Catalyst and the 6500 series. I have worked with Acer routers, HP enterprise-level switches, Dell S-series and N-series, Juniper's MX series routers and EX series switches, and Huawei's S-Series switches and NE-Series routers.
This product is very easy to deploy and any home user can do it. For the typical home user, I don't think that it would take more than a day to set up and deploy.
The price of Linksys products is pretty reasonable.
My advice for anybody who is considering this product is that it is well-suited for home uses and small businesses. My only complaints are about the user interface and the stacking capabilities.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.