Check Point Harmony Endpoint Reviews

I use Check Point Harmony Endpoint because it is an easy solution to implement and a good solution overall. It effectively does its work for me.

Harmony Endpoint has a geo policy that allows me to see where users log in from, enabling me to analyze if someone tries to access an account from another location. It offers a good false positive rate and provides protection across all platforms of 365.

One area that requires improvement is the amount of audit logs the system can save, as it is currently limited to fourteen days.

With Harmony Endpoint, I have three years of experience. With Harmony Email and Collaboration, I have five years of experience.

Deployment was easy and took less than a day, as it is a SaaS solution that partners with Check Point.

The stability of the tool is high, as I have not experienced any downtime.

It possesses high scalability because it is a SaaS solution from the cloud, allowing expansion as needed.

Although I have not contacted technical support recently, in the beginning, there were some issues that had to be addressed. Despite this, their support was helpful enough for me to give them a seven out of ten.

Neutral

Previously, my company used a Titan solution for email and collaboration. We switched to Check Point due to better pricing and additional protection on platforms like OneDrive, Teams, and all 365 platforms.

The initial setup was straightforward and completed within a day, which I would rate as an eight out of ten.

As a SaaS solution, it was implemented with Check Point's partner.

There has been a good return on investment. The product is affordable and provides excellent coverage and protection across multiple platforms.

The price for Check Point Harmony Endpoint is good considering the services it offers. It is not expensive and provides comprehensive coverage.

I recommend Check Point Harmony Endpoint to others if they need it. It depends on the infrastructure, yet it still provides good protection. Overall, I would rate the solution a five out of ten.

Public Cloud

Other

The main use of this product is endpoint security, it is very useful when you are trying to centralize endpoint security management and you want an easy and fast setup, I have used this product in POCs and different size deployments with different kinds of clients. Harmony offers several layers of protection and it fits well with all the Check Point "ecosystem", (It is especially useful when you are correlating security data because it can "talk" with Check Point's XDR Solution in order to get more insights).

There are several benefits that you can get with this solution:

1) You get centralized management of endpoints in your organization and you can be very granular in order to create endpoint security policies for different user groups. This improves overall security and visibility for IT departments.

2) Visibility also offers improvement with purchases and making decisions.

3) Information is easily managed and protected (which is particularly useful in lost or stolen endpoints).

4) It can be used with an XDR system (which is very useful with SOCs).

The most valuable aspects include:

1) Cloud Centralized management. This is particularly useful since you don't have to use any on-premise server, the cloud dashboard is activated without a minimum license number.

2) Several layers of security. It is well aligned with actual threats like ransomware and zero-day attacks and offers traditional layers of security.

3) Visibility. You have a single dashboard for all endpoint information that you need from an IT administrative perspective and in a threat incident you are properly advised.

There are some "weak points" that have to be mentioned, including:

1) If the IT department is used to "cloning" endpoints (making images) you are going to have a hard time trying to install the product and you are going to end up reading a lot of Check Point documents.

2) If you are used to the granularity of roles features in Check Point Quantums products you are going to be a little bit disappointed. You can't set customized roles with customized read/write permissions.

3) You need a mature security team to manage this solution in order to get the most value from it.

I've used this product since its release.

The solution is very stable in the correct context; with its cloud nature, it is unlikely to have any downtime.

The solution is very scalable since the console is a cloud; you only have to buy more licenses in order to grow.

TAC is very useful and its dashboard is very intuitive. You can get web, mail, and telephone support.

Positive

We used several solutions, such as Symantec, ESET, and Kaspersky.

The initial setup is straightforward. It is very fast due to its cloud nature.

We implemented the solution with the help of a vendor team; they have good documentation and are experts.

The ROI is very hard to measure. It is best to take a proactive posture of protecting your assets. 

It is a very good security product yet it is not the cheapest one. Licensing is very easy to understand and it includes Check Point TAC support.

We evaluated various solutions, including Symantec, ESET, Trellix, and Kaspersky.

It is a very mature solution and one of the most secure that exists in the security market share.

Private Cloud

Other

We work with Check Point Harmony Endpoint as partners, providing deployment services, particularly for small to medium enterprises (SMEs). We work with both small and large companies.

Endpoint protection is valuable. Stability is good, and the product is well-designed for security needs. It is scalable and offers multiple features, which justify its pricing for enterprise customers. Since security is a major concern, we do not worry about the pricing as the product has features built-in.

Support needs improvement. Currently, support is primarily via email, which leads to longer response times. Fine-tuning for applications and better support from Harmony would be helpful, especially once the environment is hardened. Better technical support would enhance the product's competitiveness.

We have been working with Check Point Harmony Endpoint for almost five years.

Stability is fine, and the product performs well in terms of security. It is considered well and good.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint is scalable, suitable for both small and large companies.

Support service needs improvement. Only email support is available, leading to delays in getting assistance.

Negative

Implementation is straightforward for smaller environments, however, requires significant fine-tuning for larger clients.

We only handle deployment and do not deal with pricing, which is taken care of by another department.

Pricing is a bit expensive but justified by the product’s features, capabilities, and scalability. It is suitable for enterprises but can be challenging to position for small to medium customers.

We recommend Check Point Harmony Endpoint; however, support needs enhancement. With improved support, it could outperform competitors. Rating based on the alone featureset is nine out of ten.

We use Check Point to manage email security in our O365 environment.  Our previous solution was unable to remove all of the email spam we had. Check Point integrates with Office 365 to provide advanced threat protection for email. It uses techniques like anti-virus, URL filtering, and threat emulation to stop known and unknown threats. It also offers goes beyond email security. It protects all aspects of Office 365 collaboration tools like SharePoint, OneDrive, and Teams. It can prevent data loss, enforce policy compliance, and block phishing attacks.

It manages to capture more spam with a smaller footprint. It has a single agent and management console to streamline security administration. This can save IT staff time and resources compared to managing multiple security products. The endpoint combines Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR), and Extended Detection and Response (XDR) capabilities. 

This comprehensive approach can safeguard your organization from a wider range of threats, including ransomware, malware, phishing attacks, and zero-day exploits.

Ease of setup and ability to hook into O365 directly without MX record changes. Check Point offers advanced threat prevention capabilities, including SandBlast Network Threat Emulation and Threat Extraction. These features can identify and stop even unknown threats by simulating real-world attacks in a safe environment. Check Point solutions are designed to scale to meet the needs of large organizations. They can handle high volumes of traffic without compromising performance. Check Point integrates with a wide range of third-party security solutions. This allows you to create a comprehensive security ecosystem that meets your specific needs.

I would like to see a better UI for admin functions. While CheckPoint offers threat prevention through SandBlast, some users feel even deeper integration of Machine Learning (ML) could enhance threat detection and improve automation. This could involve automating security responses and offering threat prediction capabilities. As organizations increasingly move to the cloud, Check Point could further strengthen its cloud-native security offerings. This might involve expanding support for various cloud platforms and offering more granular security controls within those environments.

I have used Check Point Harmony Endpoint for six months.

We haven't had issues or outages so far. 

It seems to be able to scale to any size company. 

Their support has been very positive. It's easy to use. 

Positive

Sophos was our previous vendor, we found their coverage lacking.

The setup was straightforward, it's hands-on config. 

CDW was our MSP. 

We expect to see ROI in 12-16 months. 

My advice would be to state terms upfront and always ask to haggle down.

We looked at Fortinet, Palo Alto, Crowdstrike, etc. 

Make sure to review your solutions every couple years as technology changes. 

Private Cloud

We use it for the complete protection of more than 5,000 devices of our company and our customers. 

We have Harmony Endpoint (Advanced) managed from the Check Point Cloud, mostly for Microsoft Windows 7, 8, and 10 devices, as well as Windows Servers (mostly 2012 and 2019). We also have a few protected Linux desktops and server devices. 

As for the protections enabled, we have mainly Threat Prevention (including Antimalware, Antibot, Anti-ransomware, EDR, and Threat Emulation/sandboxing); Firewall, application control, compliance, and port protection modules deployed.

We used to use other security solutions (Windows Defender and Kaspersky), however, we had security incidents that affected us (viruses and ransomware) and they were very difficult to identify or when we did identify them it was already a long time after the incident occurred and we did not know the cause and therefore affected the operability of our company considerably. 

Since we made the decision to move to Check Point Harmony we have had greater visibility of everything that happens on our devices and take a preventive approach rather than a reactive strategy, in addition to being more confident that we have Check Point protecting us.

The characteristics that we find most valuable are its anti-ransomware protection, zero-day phishing protection, web browsing filtering, and vulnerability and patch management. The level of security and visibility they provide is great and it is very easy to configure and maintain. We have almost no false positives. 

A feature that we really like is the ease of management and administration that Check Point offers us, in addition to including the management server in its cloud and the predefined dashboards and reports.

We would love to have more endpoint hardware and software inventory, as well as tools to perform troubleshooting directly on the endpoint remotely. 

A further point of improvement would be to be able to optimize the consumption of resources on the device. 

We would also like the application control module to be further developed in future versions to include applications commonly used or maintained by Check Point in order to be able to configure blocking policies more quickly.

We have been using this product for more than three years.

We have not had any problems with stability so far. It has left us with a good impression.

The scalability of cloud management is excellent.

On the few times we have required support, it has taken us some time to resolve the issues completely, however, in the end, it was accomplished.

Positive

We changed solutions since what we had was not effective against the attacks we see today; besides, the visibility was very low and the management was very complicated.

The initial deployment was simple and the solution gave us several tools to do so.

We deployed via an in-house team.

In three years, the expected ROI was achieved.

The management of the solution is very simple and the deployment tools are diverse, which greatly reduces the workload. Licensing is also quite simple with three main options and some add-ons. 

It is licensed per device (whether it is a desktop, laptop, server, etc.), and the price is very attractive and competitive.

We evaluated other options including Cisco AMP and Fortinet EDR.

I'd recommend users to be careful with low-resource devices as the solution has several security modules that can affect the performance of these devices. In our case, we had some old machines where we grouped them and created a more optimized policy for these legacy devices.

Public Cloud

Other

My main use case for Check Point Harmony Endpoint is to use it as an EDR in our endpoint solution, endpoints.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint helps us with advanced threat protection, malware, and everything that can raise security concerns with the endpoint.

I don't have anything else to add about my main use case or how it fits into my overall security strategy.

In my opinion, the best features Check Point Harmony Endpoint offers are advanced threat protection, ransomware protection, phishing and malware prevention, centralized management, and generative AI protection. All these features stand out for me.

The centralized management and AI protection of Check Point Harmony Endpoint help us to easily deploy all the endpoints, new endpoints, centrally monitor them, policy enforcement, and everything. It has increased our efficiency.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint has positively impacted my organization by reducing incidents.

Since implementing Check Point Harmony Endpoint, my incidents have reduced by around 15 to 20%.

I hope the agent size of Check Point Harmony Endpoint could be reduced for improvement.

The agent size has affected my experience by causing some performance issues with old machines where RAM was less than 8GB.

I don't want to add more about the needed improvements or anything else that could make my experience better.

I have been using Check Point Harmony Endpoint for almost two years.

The scalability of Check Point Harmony Endpoint is rated as eight out of ten.

The customer support is rated as nine out of ten.

I would rate the customer support on a scale of 1 to 10 as nine.

Positive

I previously used Broadcom because it was an age-old solution and we don't use it anymore.

I have seen a return on investment with time saved because we don't get too many incidents now.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is satisfactory.

Before choosing Check Point Harmony Endpoint, I did not evaluate other options.

My advice to others looking into using Check Point Harmony Endpoint is to go for it.

I choose nine instead of another rating because if the agent size was less, I would have given 10.

My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

I was not offered a gift card or incentive for this review.

I rate Check Point Harmony Endpoint a nine out of ten.

On-premises

In the intricate web of digital landscapes, my primary use of Check Point Endpoint Security is a guardian for my organization's digital footprint. This robust solution stands as a vigilant sentinel, meticulously securing each endpoint against the relentless tide of cyber threats. 

Its dynamic threat prevention capabilities, seamlessly integrated into our environment, create an impervious shield against malware, ransomware, and other malicious actors. 

With an intuitive interface and real-time monitoring, it not only defends but also empowers, allowing me to traverse the digital domain with confidence. 

In this narrative of cyber resilience, Check Point Endpoint Security is not just a tool; it ensures that every endpoint under its watch remains secure in our interconnected digital ecosystem.

The integration of Check Point Endpoint Security has been a transformative force within my organization. 

As we embraced this robust solution, a paradigm shift occurred – a palpable enhancement in our digital resilience. The advanced threat prevention mechanisms woven into the fabric of Check Point have acted as an impenetrable shield, thwarting malicious intruders and fortifying the security posture of every endpoint. 

This newfound defense has not only safeguarded our sensitive data but has also instilled a sense of confidence among our team members, enabling them to navigate the digital realm without fear.

Check Point Endpoint Security has proven to be a beacon of resilience, with its multifaceted features illuminating our defense strategy. The real-time threat prevention capabilities stand out as a fortress against malware, ransomware, and evolving cyber threats, offering a proactive defense that safeguards our organization's critical assets. 

The granular control over endpoint activities empowers us to tailor security policies, ensuring a bespoke approach that aligns with our unique operational needs. The intuitive dashboard and centralized management streamline our security operations, enhancing efficiency and providing a comprehensive overview of our digital landscape. 

Notably, the seamless integration with other security components orchestrates a harmonious defense orchestra, fostering collaboration and maximizing the synergy of our security infrastructure. 

In this narrative of fortified cybersecurity, it's the amalgamation of these features that makes Check Point Endpoint Security an invaluable guardian, fortifying our digital realm against the relentless march of cyber threats.

A robust threat intelligence integration could elevate proactive defense, offering real-time insights to anticipate and thwart emerging threats more effectively. 

Enhanced behavioral analytics would provide a deeper understanding of endpoint activities, fortifying our defenses against sophisticated cyber adversaries. 

Streamlined incident response tools within the platform would empower security teams to react swiftly and decisively in the face of potential breaches. Integration with emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, could usher in a new era of adaptive and self-learning security protocols. 

Furthermore, a user-friendly interface for custom reporting and analytics would empower organizations to derive actionable insights from security data. In this ongoing narrative of cybersecurity evolution, the inclusion of these features in the next release would undoubtedly fortify Check Point Endpoint Security as an even more comprehensive and dynamic guardian in the ever-expanding digital frontier.

I've used the solution for more than three years.

The solution is very stable.

The scalability is very good.

The technical support is excellent.

Positive

We used to use Kaspersky, and we switched for security reasons.

The initial setup was straightforward; it was easy.

We handled the setup in-house.

Its price is competitive.

We also evaluated Trend Micro.

On-premises

I use it for end point protection, and I am also using full disk encryption Harmony both solutions are adopted. 

One of the advantages is the reporting functionality. For example, if some critical data is available on a laptop and the laptop gets stolen - I can remotely wipe it immediately. Because, at the end of the day, apart from the device, the data is important.

So, the zero-phishing feature of Harmony Endpoint, the one I have used, was very good.

Those features are very good. Then, zero-day protection is also very important to us.

We can map the MITRE attack framework along with the Cyber Kill Chain completely.

Sandboxing is a great functionality.

The only drawback is the integration process. For example, I want to integrate with my source platform. It took some time. That's the only concern regarding the integrations.

Check Point Harmony Endpoint doesn't have any XDR kind of solution. DLP functionality and all are not yet there.

And then, the performance also sometimes gets deep. CPU utilization could be further optimized. 

I have been using it for one year. 

I faced some issues with stability. Stability was good compared to other endpoint protection. The only thing is that in the Zero Phishing future, which I like a lot, we can see when people are entering password content and other things. Phishing is important.

Since it's a SaaS platform, we can upgrade only a license. We can get it.

I have experience with SentinelOne. SentinelOne has a feature; for example, if a ransomware attack happened and a particular file was affected, we can retrieve it. If some known files got corrupted, we can roll back the file to the last known good configuration. We can do that. 

But this particular feature is not there in Check Point Endpoint. And then, importantly, USB blocking on Linux machines is not currently available in Check Point Endpoint. It supports only the scanning part, but I don't think it is supporting USB blocking and device blocking.

DLP functionality and all, they are not yet there.

The installation is very easy. It takes around 20 minutes only. 

It requires maintenance. There are a couple of people who handle more than 4,000 endpoints. So if there are more, then I can publish them. That is a one-time activity. After that, only one person can monitor. The SOC analyst is only one guy. The person who manages the endpoint completely, email as well as the endpoint, both.

We have seen ROI. Time was saved. Since it's manual, we need to pay a lot to our team. The time-saving was very good. We can establish connectivity on each agent within 20 minutes.

The pricing is okay. It is in the enterprise range. It is not middle range. It is not so costly, but it is an enterprise.

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.