Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Reviews

We have been utilizing Cambium Networks' Point-to-Point backhaul solution for our connectivity needs. It supports remote connectivity over a distance of eight kilometers.

The advantages it provides include affordability, excellent performance in various environments, compatibility with local conditions, and reliable network performance. The network latency is satisfactory.

It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality.

The Spectrum analyzer demonstrates excellence in its performance.

The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed.

I have been working with it for nineteen years.

It provides excellent stability capabilities. I would rate it ten out of ten.

Nearly four hundred or more users have been working with it within our organization.

The technical support is outstanding. I would rate it nine out of ten.

Positive

We were previously using Palo Alto, but we opted for Cambium due to the better server performance.

The initial setup was fairly straightforward.

After the physical work is completed, upgrading the link usually takes between ten to fifteen minutes. It involves one WAN technician and one engineer at one site, and another WAN engineer and one technician at the other site. The process begins with selecting the tower and determining the optimal height for mounting the antenna. Then, the angle of the antenna is adjusted accordingly. This process is required at both ends of the WAN connection.

The return on investment is significantly high. We quickly achieved ROI.

The price is affordable. There is an additional license fee required for commissioning-related activities.

I would recommend it because it offers cost-effective long-distance WAN communication with excellent network reliability. The network latency is low, throughput is high, and uptime is exceptional at 99.99%. Overall, I would rate it nine out of ten.

Some of the most valuable features of Cambium Networks, according to user experiences, include the management software, which simplifies the management of various equipment like Wi-Fi and Point-to-Multipoint (PMP) devices. It eliminates the need for additional controllers, reducing costs. Additionally, online software upgrades and the availability of different reports contribute to the convenience and efficiency of network management. The user-friendly dashboard interface further enhances the overall experience.

They could enhance the product's security features, particularly in analyzing and protecting against potential threats. The reporting capabilities and integration with different central managers could be improved. Furthermore, troubleshooting tools need improvement as well.

We have been using Cambium Networks Wireless WAN for a year.

I rate the platform's stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the platform's scalability a ten out of ten. For government projects, support extends to thousands of clients or more. I plan to expand my client base with Cambium Networks, where I manage 57 mining sites with DIP connections.

We access the technical support services through ticket registration. Additionally, two engineers in different cities provide technical support for our clients.

Positive

We previously used Aruba. We switched primarily due to cost considerations and the level of support offered by Cambium Networks.

The initial setup process is generally straightforward with Cambium Networks. Configuration is easy, but the deployment can vary depending on distance and geography. It offers templates for Wi-Fi solutions, simplifying the onboarding of access points and enabling quick connections. It can be completed within a few minutes and requires two executives to work on the process.

The number of people required for maintenance and troubleshooting depends on various factors, including the client's needs and the level of service agreement (SLA) in place. Typically, two to three dedicated personnel are allocated to support and handle different events for maintenance tasks.

I rate Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a ten out of ten.

We use the platform to increase Wi-Fi coverage.

The product is inexpensive and has a free controller feature. It is easy to deploy and has many specialists to help us handle complicated processes.

The product could have more access points to increase the network coverage. They should introduce programs, workshops, or documentation to share knowledge about the primary principles.

We have been using Cambium Networks Wireless WAN since 2018.

I rate the product’s stability a seven out of ten.

It is a scalable product. There are license fees or additional licenses for application. I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is easy once the infrastructure is ready. I rate the process an eight out of ten. It requires two technicians to execute and 30 minutes to complete. It involves configuring on-premise servers, creating new IP addresses, and starting with the work.

I rate the product’s pricing a two out of ten.

I rate Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a seven out of ten. It is inexpensive and easy to deploy. I recommend it to someone planning to deploy a solution on a limited budget.

We use the platform for outdoor network coverage, such as covering the campus of a university and other street areas. We utilize the ePMP 510 model.

The solution's most valuable feature is the network strength, which allows for coverage over a larger distance than Ruckus equipment.

The solution could improve indoor coverage strength. Based on our experience, there is no indoor coverage beyond 40 meters.

I have been working with Cambium Networks Wireless WAN for about one year and a half.

We encountered network issues, particularly at a university with many students.

I rate the stability of the solution as six or seven.

I rate the platform scalability as seven out of ten. It could be better. 

We do not have a direct contract with Cambium. However, our integrator provides support. They open tickets with Cambium when issues arise, and we are satisfied with the support received.

We used Ubiquiti before. We switched to Cambium due to its superior coverage.

The setup was straightforward. Deploying the virtual machine and controller took a few hours. Site preparation, installation, and commissioning took about two days per site.

I rate the process as a seven out of ten. 

We had a third-party integrator who handled the setup. They contacted Cambium's support team to resolve issues. 

I plan to use Cambium in future projects, especially for outdoor coverage. I rate it an eight out of ten. 

There are many valuable features like Trinity, which is a functional virtual assistant, user-defined policies, and provides compliance reporting. 

There are multiple features depending on the user's requirements. The dashboard is pretty good, and it serves us well.

Pricing is a big one. We can make it more competitive. Other things I can see are SQL and the slide on the top. And pricing. Cambium add more features to the SQL functionality.

Basically, the process of working with switching switches is a source bundle. Cambium add more features to the record server.

I have been using this solution for six months.

It is a stable solution. It has very good stability. I would rate it a ten out of ten. 

There are around 20 to 30 users at a time. It is highly scalable. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

There is room for improvement in the support. As for the MPMs (Managed Performance Metrics) on the pricing portal, no one was there to guide me on how to access the pricing information.

I needed the support to be more hands-on. I would have liked a video tutorial training. 

Neutral

I would rate my experience with the initial setup an eight out of ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy.

The deployment took one to two working days. There was a team who deployed the solution. However, I am the only one who maintains the solution.

Honestly, compared to other brands, I would rate Cambium seven on pricing, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

I would recommend using the solution. Overall, I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN can improve the price.

I have been using Cambium Networks Wireless WAN for approximately two long.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is scalable. The XV2 model of the solution can support up to 216 people at a time.

The initial setup of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is not complex if you know the basics of the configuration.

I rate the initial setup of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a four out of five.

I did some training with an expert from the Cambium Networks Wireless WAN team. They thought me how to configure and set up the solution. From this knowledge, I did the full deployment myself.

The price of this solution is expensive in Bangladesh. The cost is approximately 56,000 BDT for the XV2 which is expensive. They should reduce their price.

It would be better if the price was 35,000 BDT.

I rate the price of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a three out of five.

My advice to others is they should choose the cloud version of Cambium instead of going with Unify or Aruba. Unify is not too stable because I found that when the user capacity pushes through the limit, then the hardware is already malfunctioning and then the WiFi speed is decreased. This is why we have shifted Unify to this solution. We now use this solution in a total of seven offices. 

Everything has been working fine and we have support from the cloud portal is completely free and you can create multiple sites, and multiple networks. When you configure one single file and you can set the serial number to the cloud portal and the configuration is automatic. The solution is very good.

I rate Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a seven out of ten.

In my company, we use the AP mode of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN since there is no use of a wireless controller.

The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly.

Sometimes, I have found some roaming issues related to the solution. I did not blame Cambium for the aforementioned issue I found in the product since it is an overall good solution.

If someone wants to go to the location-based portal of the product, like the one available in Meraki, it would not be possible, and it is an area that needs improvement. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's dependencies on third-party API integrations is an area with scope for improvement.

I have been using Cambium Networks Wireless WAN for a year.

The solution's stability is okay.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight to eight and a half out of ten.

It is a scalable solution.

In my company, 40 to 45 users handle the product.

If the number of users increases, the performance of the access point will decrease. If the number of clients and users who use the solution increases, then they can get another access point for themselves.

For the wireless solution, I didn't use any support from Cambium, so I don't have any idea about Cambium's support.

The product is easy to deploy.

The product's setup phase is easy since you just need to connect to the wireless solution, go to the dashboard, and do some access point configuration, which is a very easy process.

During the deployment process, you just connect to the access points and do the access point configuration, which is a very easy deployment process.

The product's deployment phase for one access point takes an hour and a half.

In our company, one of our in-house teams takes care of the product's deployment process.

The licensing part of the solution is not very expensive.

Another option for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is from D-Link. My company chose Cambium, considering the comfort that the product's stability and pricing areas provide us over other tools.

I can recommend the solution to those who plan to use it, but it all depends on the budget of those who want to buy it.

I rate the overall product a nine out of ten.

It is a good product for cloud management.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better.

It is an easy-to-sale platform.

The technical support could be better.

Positive

The initial setup is very easy and requires zero maintenance.

Cambium Networks Wireless WAN has medium pricing.

I rate Cambium Networks Wireless WAN a nine out of ten.