Aruba Instant On Switches Reviews

The solution is used in certain districts and airports in my country.

The most valuable feature of the solution is its GUI. The simplicity of the tool's GUI is good.

The difficulty with the tool is in the area of troubleshooting. The problem that we have in our company is that the switches don't get connected properly.

In the future, I want to see AI in the tool.

The tool's pricing part can be improved.

I have been using Aruba Instant On Switches for five years.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Four people in my company use the tool.

I deal with six clients who use the tool. The clients I deal with are large businesses.

The solution's technical support has been helpful. I don't have to reach out to the support team much. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten.

Positive

I also work with Fortinet's switches. I also have experience with Extreme Networks switches. I use Cisco's switches. I use Aruba Instant On Switches since my team needs it.

Our company needed some support for the product's initial setup phase.

The solution is deployed on the cloud and on an on-premises model. I use Azure's private cloud services.

The solution can be deployed in around twenty minutes.

My company's technical team consists of nine people who take care of the product's installation phase. There are two engineers and the others are technicians.

If one is very bad, and ten is a very good price, I rate the tool's price as a six.

There is a need to maintain the tool once on a quarterly basis. I maintain the tool by myself and with the help of another company.

The tool helps with AI-driven projects by defining if there is a problem in the product.

I recommend the tool to others.

Aruba provides access points and switches for all our projects.

As there are better products than Aurba in the market, I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

The solution is ideal for small and medium sized enterprises. 

The online monitoring tool and the configuration of the application with the tool are valuable features. 

In the next version, they should add a firewall from a single source.

I have been using the solution for three years. 

The solution is very stable. I rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

The solution is scalable. 

You cannot work from your mobile application. You don't have a Command One interface to do the old stuff. For data centers or different solutions, you have many more features and more capabilities. I rate the scalability a seven out of ten. 

The technical support team is good. 

I previously used UniFi. With UniFi, you need to have a controller in the cell phone on your devices. Once you do have the controller, you cannot access it, and you will have to troubleshoot. You need more control and this may be more complicated.

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment takes six to fifteen minutes. 

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten. 

In my company, I use Aruba Instant On Switches to manage enterprise connectivity.

The cost and simplicity of the product are its most valuable features.

The product's drawbacks are limited. Aruba Instant On Switches doesn't provide my company with the flexibility that we were expecting from it. The scalability of the product is also limited, because of which we cannot install it on a large scale in our company. In my company, we cannot manage Aruba Instant On Switches in a very easy manner, making the overall tool a little bit complicated to set up and run. The aforementioned areas can be considered for improvement in the solution.

In the future, I would like to see Aruba Instant On Switches with some AI features that can help run and operate the network while also helping its users spot any issues and fix them.

I have been using Aruba Instant On Switches for a year and a half. Since Aruba's support contract covers my company, we always get the upgraded and latest version of the solution.

It is a stable solution, but it doesn't meet the standards we expect in our company. It is a simple product to use. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

It is not a very scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six out of ten.

Around 70 people in diverse roles, including executive to system technicians, use the solution in my company.

My company has worked with products from Cisco, like two years ago. My company chose Aruba Instant On Switches over Cisco due to cost-related reasons.

The solution is deployed on a private cloud, and my company uses the cloud service provided by AWS.

The maintenance part of the solution is taken care of by a system integrator from Aruba's partner.

The product's shortcomings limit the operations of the daily work in our company. Shortly, my company plans to look at other products in the market.

Customers need to consider the drawbacks of Aruba Instant On Switches before buying it.

I rate the overall solution a six and a half out of ten. To be more precise, I rate the overall solution a six out of ten.

We work with various types of switches, including the Aruba 8000 series, 6000 series, 2000 series, and 3000 series, depending on the specific requirements of our customers. We adapt our solutions to meet each customer's unique needs rather than focusing on a single model or type. Customers can easily manage, control, and monitor the solution via Aruba GUI.

The solution provides GUI control, making it particularly suitable for small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) and small office/home office (SOHO) networks. However, for larger enterprise-level organizations, it is recommended to consider Aruba's industrial-grade products.

The solution’s GUI should be improved a bit. Nowadays, nobody wants to use CLI (command-line interface). Nobody wants to type a command because they don't have the time to remember it. Hence, they prefer to use GUI products.

I have been using Aruba Instant On Switches for the past six months.

There was only one instance with a stability issue. Aruba Instant On Switches have limitations and aren't suitable for enterprise-level needs. This can result in functionality issues, power-related problems, and other challenges. We tried to tackle the challenge. However, when we required help, our service engineers contacted customer support.

Before Aruba Instant On Switches, I worked with other products. Since I love technology, I learn about all types of technological products, including all types of switches.

The solution’s initial setup is very easy.

Our team of engineers are responsible for the installation of the solution.

With respect to GUI, Aruba Instant On Switches has competitors in Cisco, D-Link, and NETGEAR.

Overall, I rate Aruba Instant On Switches a nine out of ten.

We primarily use Instant On Switches for basic networking.

Instant On Switches' best feature is the 1930, which is stackable.

Instant On Switches' layer 3 and visibility could be improved. In the next release, Instant On Switches should include a bulk configuration feature for selecting multiple interfaces at the same time.

I've been working with Instant On Switches for over two years.

Aruba's technical support is good and responsive.

The initial setup is seamless, and deployment takes between ten and fifteen minutes.

The license for Instant On Switches is free.

Instant On Switches is a cost-effective solution with reasonable features and visibility. I would rate it eight out of ten.

I am using Aruba switches primarily for security, more than one site, stability, and reliability.

The most valuable features I find in Aruba Instant On switches include the access list and VLANs, along with other features such as security and cloud capabilities. The creation of multi-VLANs, access list between VLANs, control, management, and the easy monitoring of switches make it a reliable choice for my organization.

Some models need enhancement of the web interface to make management and monitoring easier. I would appreciate a single interface to manage all network switches from one dashboard.

I have been working with Aruba switches for more than two or three years.

The product is very stable to use and very reliable.

Scalability is a concern. We need to change the model if we want scalability since some models cannot cover all needs in future plans.

HP's technical support is very good in terms of response time and quality. However, the support can depend on the company partner. I deal with a big partner in Egypt, which affects the support quality.

Neutral

We previously used HP switches and moved to Aruba switches since we changed our infrastructure to HCI.

The initial setup for Aruba switches was simple compared to Cisco and other vendors.

I compared Aruba with Cisco, Juniper, and Fortinet. For Fortinet, I considered the FortiSwitch.

I rate Aruba Instant On switches an eight out of ten.

It is used for small and medium-sized businesses. 

It is easy for deployment and configuration.

Tracking with instant switches needs improvement.

I have been using Aruba Instant On Switches for eight years. 

It is a highly stable solution. I rate the stability a ten out of ten.

It is scalable solution. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten.

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment takes five minutes time. I rate the setup a ten out of ten. 

The pricing is cheap. 

Aruba Switches are easy to configure and very stable. I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

We use the solution in hotels that do not need switches with high capacity.

The solution is suitable for small businesses and small offices. It has good features.

The product must be integrated with Aruba Central for better management.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The tool is very stable.

The tool is scalable. We work with small offices and businesses that do not need high-capacity switches and do not have a lot of data traffic. The customer provides the switches and access points. Our implementation team takes not more than two days.

The setup is very easy. The management is also easy. The deployment takes a few seconds. We just need the internet and the serial number of the device to deploy the product. The devices are on-premise, and the service is on the cloud.

Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.