Karthick Selvam - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at Saama
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
A stable storage solution that provides good technical support
Pros and Cons
  • "Amazon EBS is a storage system, and the storage is attached to the servers."
  • "It would be better to analyze and find a way to merge both the file systems of Linux and Windows."

What is most valuable?

Amazon EBS is a storage system, and the storage is attached to the servers. If you are using multiple things like applications and DB inside a server, it needs much storage. The storage dependency is configured with Amazon EBS.

What needs improvement?

We can directly attach any of the servers. Since the file systems of different operating systems, like Linux and Windows, are different, we cannot merge them. It would be better to analyze and find a way to merge both the file systems of Linux and Windows.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Amazon EBS is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

In our organization, we are using 50 to 70 servers and 10 to 50 RDS. Each and every database server has Amazon EBS.

Buyer's Guide
Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store)
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

How are customer service and support?

The solution’s technical support is good.

How was the initial setup?

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

What other advice do I have?

Users should use Amazon EBS if they are going to configure anything at the Amazon server level.

Overall, I rate Amazon EBS ten out of ten.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Co-Founder at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
Very scalable but costly
Pros and Cons
  • "The most valuable feature is its scalability. I can easily scale the block from terabytes to gigabytes."
  • "The cost of using EBS is high compared to other cloud vendors such as Tencent Cloud or CARI Cloud. Some costs are generated immediately and some are likely to increase."

What is our primary use case?

At our company, we use it for data storage. We work on Cloud Clusters, so we use EBS as the underlying storage.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is its scalability. I can easily scale the block from terabytes to gigabytes.

What needs improvement?

There are not many technical things that need improvement in EBS. It has a very long history and is AWS's first product. Its main flaw is the costliness.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with EBS for three years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

EBS is stable. I have not seen any fluctuations when it comes to its stability. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I would rate the scalability of EBS a nine out of ten.

How are customer service and support?

I work with Amazon Web Service in the China region. I'm satisfied with how fast the technical team usually responds.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is quite easy. I would give it a nine out of ten in terms of ease of use. It only takes a few minutes to deploy, sometimes even less.

We deploy EBS in two ways. One is on the AWS console where there are options to select from and we do that in a few clicks. Sometimes we create a virtual machine and then create EBS simultaneously because the AWS console provides options we can use. Another way is by using our own infrastructure as code/technology. We deploy EBS through our infrastructure codes, and then the EBS is deployed automatically. We have about 200 clients using EBS. Some of them are small, but most are enterprise businesses. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The cost of using EBS is high compared to other cloud vendors such as Tencent Cloud or CARI Cloud. For example, the EBS standard storage and snapshot are relatively expensive. If we cannot maintain our snapshot policy in a good economic way, there will be extra costs. Some costs are generated immediately and some are likely to increase. If the price of snapshots keeps increasing, we might not be able to afford it anymore. In terms of costliness, I would rate it an eight out of ten.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to people who are considering using EBS is to use the correct type according to your performance. If you want any additional features, you will have to pay more. You will need to deactivate or delete snapshots in order to avoid extra costs. You should monitor the performance as well. Overall, I would rate ETB an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store)
April 2024
Learn what your peers think about Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store). Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: April 2024.
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Olhbe456 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT Infrastructure/Systems Admin at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Real User
Top 5Leaderboard
Stable product with an easy initial setup process
Pros and Cons
  • "The product’s most valuable feature is IOPS."
  • "The initial setup process is easy."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon EBS for data migration purposes for a bank.

What is most valuable?

The product’s most valuable feature is IOPS.

What needs improvement?

The product has volume limitations.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Amazon EBS for a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The platform is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

We have five administrators in our organization using Amazon EBS.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We're using HPE Storage.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup process is easy. We have to follow the prompt and provision the prerequisites for workload.

What other advice do I have?

I rate Amazon EBS a nine out of ten. I advise others to understand specific workload requirements and business goals. If you are looking for a performance-oriented workload optimization solution, you can go for EBS.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Vishal  Devmurari - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Architect at Paramatrix Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
Real User
Top 5
Big space that is reasonably priced but setup could be easier
Pros and Cons
  • "The solution provides big space that is reasonably priced."
  • "The setup could be easier."

What is our primary use case?

Our team uses the solution as secondary or backup storage. Currently, we have ten users. 

What is most valuable?

The solution provides big space that is reasonably priced. 

What needs improvement?

The setup could be easier. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using the solution for one year. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The solution is stable with few issues. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The solution is scalable based on how much storage you purchase. 

How are customer service and support?

I have not needed technical support. 

How was the initial setup?

The setup is medium but not too difficult. 

What about the implementation team?

We implemented the solution in-house. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The solution is reasonably priced. 

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We are familiar with and prefer AWS services in our environment. We did not evaluate other options. 

What other advice do I have?

Our team uses the solution but is less dependent on it because it serves as secondary storage. 

We do not have enough exposure to rate the solution's features. Based on our use, the solution is rated a six out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: Partner
PeerSpot user
Chandran  J - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Executive -Devops at CIAR Software Solutions Pvt Ltd
Real User
Top 10
Useful for customer data and storage but UI during data transactions needs to improve
Pros and Cons
  • "The product comes with multiple central port installations like gp2 and gp3."
  • "Amazon EBS needs to improve its user interface for data transactions."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon EBS for customer data and storage. 

What is most valuable?

The product comes with multiple central port installations like gp2 and gp3. 

What needs improvement?

Amazon EBS needs to improve its user interface for data transactions. 

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with the product for two years. 

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The tool is highly stable. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Amazon EBS is highly scalable. I am the single user of the product in my company. I use it 24/7. 

How was the initial setup?

The tool's deployment is easy. I rate it an eight out of ten. Deployment gets completed in 10 minutes. One resource is enough to handle the deployment maintenance. 

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

You need to pay additional costs for support. 

What other advice do I have?

I rate Amazon EBS a ten out of ten. 

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
PeerSpot user
Independent Analyst and Advisory Consultant at Server StorageIO - www.storageio.com
Consultant
Top 20
Cloud conversations: AWS EBS overview

Amazon Web Services (AWS) announced global availability of Elastic Block Storage (EBS) optimized support for four extra Elastic Cloud Computing (EC2) instance types. The support enables optimized performance between standard and provisioned IOP EBS volumes and EC2 instances to meet different bandwidth or throughput needs (learn more about AWS EBS, EC2, S3 and Glacier here).

The four EBS optimized instance types are m3.xlarge, m3.2xlarge, m2.2xlarge and c1.xlarge for dedicated bandwidth or throughput between the EC2 instances and EBS volumes. The performance or bandwidth ranges from 500Mb (500/8 = 62.5MB) per second, to 1,000 Mbits (1,000 / 8 = 125MB) per second depending on the type of instance. 

As a refresher, EC2 instances (why by time you read this could change) vary in size and functionality with different amounts of EC2 Unit of Compute (ECU), number of virtual cores, amount of storage space included, 32 or 64 bit, storage and networking IO performance, and EBS Optimized or not. In addition to instances, different operating system images can be installed using those licensed from AWS such as various Windows and Unix or supply your own.

There are also different generations of instances such as M1 (first generation where one ECU = 1.0 to 1.2Ghz of a 2007 era Opteron or Xeon processor), M3 (second generation with faster processors) along with Micro low-cost options. There are also other optimized instances including high or large amounts of memory, high CPU or compute processing, clustered compute, high memory clustered, clustered GPU (e.g. using Nivida Tesla GPUs), high IO and high storage space capacity needs

Here is the announcement from AWS:

______________________________________

Dear Amazon Web Services Customer,

We are delighted to announce the global availability of EBS-optimized support for four additional instance types: m3.xlarge, m3.2xlarge, m2.2xlarge, and c1.xlarge. EBS-optimized instances deliver dedicated throughput between Amazon EC2 and Amazon EBS, with options between 500 Megabits per second and 1,000 Megabits per second depending on the instance type used. The dedicated throughput minimizes contention between EBS I/O and other traffic from your Amazon EC2 instance, providing the best performance for your EBS volumes.

EBS-optimized instances are designed for use with both Standard and Provisioned IOPS EBS volumes. Standard volumes deliver 100 IOPS on average with a best effort ability to burst to hundreds of IOPS, making them well-suited for workloads with moderate and bursty I/O needs. When attached to an EBS-optimized instance, Provisioned IOPS volumes are designed to consistently deliver up to 2000 IOPS from a single volume, making them ideal for I/O intensive workloads such as databases. You can attach multiple Amazon EBS volumes to a single instance and stripe your data across them for increased I/O and throughput performance.

Amazon EBS-optimized support is now available for m3.xlarge, m3.2xlarge, m2.2xlarge, m2.4xlarge, m1.large, m1.xlarge, and c1.xlarge instance types, and is currently supported in the US-East (N. Virginia), US-West (N. California), US-West (Oregon), EU-West (Ireland), Asia Pacific (Singapore), Asia Pacific (Japan), Asia Pacific (Sydney), and South America (São Paulo) Regions.

You can learn more by visiting the Amazon EC2 detail page.

Sincerely,

The Amazon EC2 Team

______________________________________

What this means is that AWS is enabling customers to size their compute instances and storage volumes with more flexibility to meet different needs. For example, EC2 instances with various compute processing capabilities, amount of memory, network and storage I/O performance to volumes. In addition, storage volumes based on different space capacity size, standard or provisioned IOP’s, bandwidth or throughput performance between the instance and volume, along with data protection such as snapshots.

This means that the cost per space capacity of an EBS volume varies based on which AWS availability zone it is in, standard (lower IOP performance) or provisioned IOP’s (faster), along with instance type. In other words, cloud storage is not just about the cost per GByte, it’s also about the cost for IOPS, bandwidth to use it, where it is located (e.g. with AWS which Availability Zone), type of service, level of availability and durability among other attributes.

PART I

For those not familiar, Simple Storage Services (S3), Glacier and Elastic Block Storage (EBS) are part of the AWS cloud storage portfolio of services. There are several other storage and data related service for little data database (SQL and NoSql based) other offerings include compute, data management, application and networking for different needs shown in the following image.


AWS Services Console via www.amazon.com

AWS basics

AWS consists of multiple regions that contain multiple availability zones where data and applications are supported from.

Note that objects stored in a region never leave that region, such as data stored in the EU west never leave Ireland, or data in the US East never leaves Virginia.

AWS does support the ability for user controlled movement of data between regions for business continuance (BC), high availability (HA) and disaster recovery (DR). Read more here at the AWS Security and Compliance site and in this AWS white paper.

What about EBS'

That brings us to Elastic Block Storage (EBS) that is used by EC2 as storage for cloud and virtual machines or compute instances. In addition to using S3 as a persistent backing store or target for holding snapshots EBS can be thought of as primary storage. You can provision and allocate EBS volumes in the different data centers of the various AWS availability zones. As part of allocating your EBS volume you indicate the type (standard) or provisioned IOP’s or the new EBS Optimized volumes. EBS Optimized volumes enables instances that support the feature to have better IO performance to storage.

The following image shows an EC2 instance with EBS volumes (standard and provisioned IOPS’s) along with S3 volumes and snapshots. In the following example the instance and volumes are being served via the AWS US East region (Northern Virginia) using availability zone US East 1a. In addition, EBS optimized volumes are shown being used in the example to increase bandwidth or throughput performance between storage and the compute instance.

Using the above as a basis, you can build on that to leverage multiple availability zones or regions for HA, BC and DR combined with application, network load balancing and other capabilities. Note that EBS volumes are protected for durability by being spread across different servers and storage in an availability zone. Additional protection is provided by using snapshots combined with S3. Additional BC and DR or HA protection can be accomplished by replicating data across availability zones.

The above is an example of tying various components and services together. For example using different AWS availability zones, instances, EBS, S3 and other tools including those from third parties. In addition, here is an AWS white paper on using their services for BC, HA, and DR.

EBS volumes are created ranging in size from 1GB to 1TB in space capacity with multiple volumes being mapped or attached to an EC2 instances. EBS volumes appear as a virtual disk drive for block storage. From the EC2 instance and guest operating system you can mount, format and use the EBS volumes as any other block disk drive with your favorite tools and file systems. In addition to space capacity, EBS volumes are also provisioned with standard IO (e.g., disk-based) performance or high performance Provisioned IOPS (e.g., SSD) for thousands of IOPS per instance. AWS states that a standard EBS volume should support about 100 IOP’s on average, with about 2,000 IOPS for a provisioned IOP volume. Need more than 2,000 IOPS, then the AWS recommendation is to use multiple IOP provisioned volumes with data spread across those. Following is an example of AWS EBS volumes seen via the EC2 management interface.


AWS EC2 and EBS configuration status

Note that there is a 10 to 1 ratio of space capacity to IOPs being provisioned. If you try to play a game of 1,000 IOPS provisioned on a 10GB EBS volume to keep your costs down you are out of luck. Thus to get 1,000 IOPS's you would need to allocate at least a 100GB EBS volume of which you will be billed for the actual space used on a monthly prorated basis. The following is an example of provisioning an AWS EBS volume using provisioned IOPS in the US East region in the 1a availability zone.


Provisioning IOPS with EBS volume

Standard and Provisioned IOPS EBS volumes

Standard EBS volumes are good for boot images or other application usage that are not IO performance intensive. For database or other active applications where more performance is needed, then EBS Provisioned IOPS volumes are your option. Note that the provisioned IOP rate is persistent for the specific volume during its life. Thus if you set it and forget it including not using it without turning it off, you will be billed for provisioning it.

PART II

Note that I sometimes use other AWS regions outside the US for testing purposes, for compliance purpose my production, business or personal data is only in the US regions.

The following figure is a generic example of how cloud and object storage are accessed using different tools, hardware, software and API’s along with gateways. AWS is an example of what is shown in the following figure as a Cloud Service and S3, EBS or Glacier as cloud storage. Common example API commands are also shown which will vary by different vendors, products or solution definitions or implementations. While Amazon S3 API which is REST HTTP based has become an industry de facto standard, there are other API’s including CDMI (Cloud Data Management Interface) developed by SNIA which has gained ISO accreditation.


Cloud and object storage access example via Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking


Cloud and object storage access example via Cloud and Virtual Data Storage Networking

AWS cloud storage gateway

In 2012 AWS released their Storage Gateway that you can use and try for free here using either an EC2 Amazon Machine Instance (AMI), or deployed locally on a hypervisor such as VMware vSphere/ESXi. In general, the gateway is an AWS alternative to using third product gateway, appliances of software tools for accessing AWS storage.


Image courtesy of www.amazon.com

When deployed locally on a VM, the storage gateway communicates using the AWS API’s back to the S3 and EBS (depending on how configured) storage services. Locally, the storage gateway presents an iSCSI block access method for Windows or other servers to use.

There are two modes with one being Gateway-Stored and the other Gateway-Cached. Gateway-Stored uses your primary storage mapped to the storage gateway as primary storage and asynchronous (time delayed) snapshots (user defined) to S3 via EBS volumes. This is a handy way to have local storage for low latency access, yet use AWS for HA, BC and DR, along with a means for doing migration into or out of AWS. Gateway-cache mode places primary storage in AWS S3 with a local cached copy to reduce network overhead.

When I tried the gateway a month or so ago, using both modes, I was not able to view any of my data using standard S3 tools. For example if I looked in my S3 buckets the objects do not appear, something that AWS said had to do with where and how those buckets and objects are managed. Otoh, I was able to see EBS snapshots for the gateway-stored mode including using that as a means of moving data between local and AWS EC2 instances. Note that regardless of the AWS storage gateway mode, some local cache storage is needed, and likewise some EBS volumes will be needed depending on what mode is used.

When I used the gateway, a Windows Server mounted the iSCSI volume presented by the storage gateway and in turn served that to other systems as a shared folder. Thus while having block such as iSCSI is nice, a NAS (NFS or CIFS) presentation and access mode would also be useful. However more on the storage gateway in a future post. Also note that beyond the free trial period (you may have to pay for storage being used) for using the gateway, there are also fees for S3 and EBS storage volumes use.

How much do these AWS services cost'

Fees vary depending on which region is selected, amount of space capacity, level or durability and availability, find EBS pricing here.

Note that there is a myth that cloud vendors have hidden fees which may be the case for some, however so far I have not seen that to be the case with AWS. However, as a consumer, designer or architect, doing your homework and looking at the above links among others you can be ready and understand the various fees and options. Hence like procuring traditional hardware, software or services, do your due diligence and be an informed shopper.

Some more service cost notes include:

Standard EBS volumes are changed by the amount of storage space capacity you provision in GB until released. For EBS snapshot copies there are fees for transferring data across regions, once moved, the rates of the new region apply for the snapshot.

As with Standard volumes, volume storage for Provisioned IOPS volumes is charged by the amount you provision in GB per month. With Provisioned IOPS volumes, you are also charged by the amount you provision in IOPS pro-rated as a percentage of days you have it in use for the month.

Thus important for cloud storage planning to know not only your space requirements, also IOP’s, bandwidth, and level of availability as well as durability. so for Standard volumes, you will likely see a lower number of I/O requests on your bill than is seen by your application unless you sync all of your I/Os to disk. Thus pay attention to what your needs are in terms of availability (accessibility), durability (resiliency or survivability), space capacity, and performance.

Leverage AWS CloudWatch tools and API’s to monitoring that matter for timely insight and situational awareness into how EBS, EC2, S3, Glacier, Storage Gateway and other services are being used (or costing you). Also visit the AWS service health status dashboard to gain insight into how things are running to help gain confidence with cloud services and solutions.

When it comes to Cloud, Virtualization, Data and Storage Networking along with AWS among other services, tools and technologies including object storage, we are just scratching the surface here.

Hopefully this helps to fill in some gaps giving more information addressing questions, along with generating new ones to prepare for your journey with clouds. After all, don’t be scared of clouds. Be prepared, do your homework, identify your concerns and then address those to gain cloud confidence.

Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
it_user6186 - PeerSpot reviewer
it_user6186Independent Analyst and Advisory Consultant at Server StorageIO - www.storageio.com
Top 20Consultant

@Alin yes you can use S3 for holding EBS snashots for EC2 images as well as for other things involving EC2.

See all 6 comments
System Engineer at ANONYME
MSP
Provides efficient data security features and good technical services
Pros and Cons
  • "When I have to change the operating system or delete a host, I can store the data in EBS or assign it to another host."
  • "The product data encryption feature needs improvement."

What is most valuable?

When I have to change the operating system or delete a host, I can store the data in EBS or assign it to another host. It is the most valuable feature of EBS.

What needs improvement?

The product data encryption feature needs improvement.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable platform. We never faced stability issues.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is an easy-to-scale platform. We have 50-100 EBS users.

How are customer service and support?

The product’s technical support services are good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

How was the initial setup?

The product’s initial setup process has medium complexity. It requires specific knowledge for easier deployment. It takes an hour to complete. It requires just one executive, as automation features make it easy to deploy.

For maintenance, it requires one or two people. Earlier, we accidentally removed the data from EBS. We had to restore it using the snapshots. To handle this situation, we needed a team of a maximum of three people.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

The product is low-priced than other solutions. It is very affordable for small companies. It is beneficial for customers who are already using AWS cloud services. We purchase its yearly license. There are additional costs involved depending on requirements.

What other advice do I have?

I recommend the product and rate it a nine out of ten. It provides data security. We can quickly restore data using backup snapshots from the production environment.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Business Owner at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
Robust block-storage service that's easy to use and accessible from anywhere
Pros and Cons
  • "When it comes to valuable features, ease of use would be number one."
  • "I think performance can be improved."

What is our primary use case?

We use Amazon EBS for its different business applications, basic file shares, and database. You could call it a SAN. I'm not sure technologists would call it a SAN, but I do.

How has it helped my organization?

Amazon EBS has made our organization a little more efficient.

What is most valuable?

When it comes to valuable features, ease of use would be number one. Ease of access from anywhere type of thing.

What needs improvement?

I think performance can be improved. It's like feeling latency when you compare apples to apples as far as what you have in a SAN on-site, on-prem versus an EBS volume in the cloud. If you want to get rid of the latency, then that's where these costs start to really add up. 

On the onset, it's cheaper to get started. It has every bit of capability and availability you would expect and even more than your own environment. If you're trying to get to the same or a higher level of performance, you have to bite the bullet and pay through the roof.

The ability to administer it, use it, set it up, install it, and operate it is all as easy or easier. You get the flexibility to change, snapshot, and all of the same things you could do with even more capabilities. But if you have to get the same or improve your performance, it gets exponentially more costly.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Amazon EBS for over three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

As far as stability, availability, and durability, and all of that, it's basically just about perfect. 

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Amazon EBS is easy to scale. It's easier than on-prem.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. If you've ever set up LUNs and block storage in the physical world, it's pretty much the same. Just setting up a partition and carving up the LUN, and that's about it.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Amazon EBS is expensive. What I want Amazon to do is lower the price. All the functionality that I could think of and would like to consume is already there. It's just that there's a subset of it that's not affordable to us yet.

What other advice do I have?

We're still using it on-prem, and it's just a matter of migrating to the cloud. The way I look at it, there are about 27 advantages to migrating to the cloud. There are one or two disadvantages, and these disadvantages can be overcome with money.

It's one of those things where we're selective about what's getting moved by measuring it and characterizing it. Then we pick and choose what moves next. There are some tremendous advantages to moving up to the cloud, and that's the reason why we started this effort. 

Making sure that the effort would work and would satisfy where we were going was step one. Then step two was taking, picking, and choosing which workloads to move and when to move them. Then deciding if there are workloads that would never move. I'm not sure I think that's the case yet, but it's just a matter of time and budget.

If you are thinking of getting Amazon EBS, I would advise you to characterize your priorities and incrementally measure the outcomes as you move the groupings of workloads over. Make sure that your predictions were the way it worked in reality. Then, measure the new reality, and verify with your users. Check whether the limitations and the disadvantages are acceptable to your users. If they aren't acceptable, then deliver the needed cost increments that would deliver upon that.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Amazon EBS an eight.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: April 2024
Product Categories
Cloud Storage
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.