No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
reviewer2848716 - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Network Solutions Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 4, 2026
Firewall policy changes have become faster and now streamline ticket creation and optimization
Pros and Cons
  • "AlgoSec has positively impacted our organization by helping us make policy changes quickly, which is the main benefit, and this speed has led to measurable benefits, such as saving a lot of time; before AlgoSec, we took days to implement a policy, but now we are able to make policy changes within hours."
  • "AlgoSec can be improved by enhancing the user interface and adding a few new features; the GUI can be improved."

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for AlgoSec is firewall ticket creation for implementing new firewall rules.

For example, if I want to create a new firewall rule in firewalls such as Palo Alto or Check Point, I need to enter the information, details, source IP, destination IP, and port into AlgoSec. Then, AlgoSec will create a ticket, and it will be assigned to the firewall resource who will implement the change.

AlgoSec's workflow allows it to check the existing firewall rules and identify the firewalls where the rules need to be implemented.

What is most valuable?

The best features AlgoSec offers are its ease of use and the simplicity of ticket creation, and AlgoSec helps to identify the firewalls where the rules need to be configured.

When I refer to ease of use, I mainly mean the speed at which we can make changes, as it is very quick.

Regarding features, I think policy optimization is a good feature, as using AlgoSec we can find redundant policies and it is easy to optimize the policies.

AlgoSec has positively impacted our organization by helping us make policy changes quickly, which is the main benefit. This speed has led to measurable benefits, such as saving a lot of time; before AlgoSec, we took days to implement a policy, but now we are able to make policy changes within hours.

What needs improvement?

AlgoSec can be improved by enhancing the user interface and adding a few new features; the GUI can be improved. Support would be a valuable additional improvement.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AlgoSec for eight years.

Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using AlgoSec is to go ahead with it. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Last updated: Jun 4, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
reviewer2848305 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Engineer at a outsourcing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 3, 2026
Firewall policy changes have become automated and cleanup now saves time and reduces errors
Pros and Cons
  • "AlgoSec has positively impacted my organization by saving time, reducing errors, and making things easier for my team."
  • "I am pretty happy with the product."

What is our primary use case?

I have been using AlgoSec for about three years. My main use case for AlgoSec is firewall rule automation. For barrel, I specifically use AlgoSec for firewall rule. I mainly use AlgoSec for firewall management by automating policy changes.

What is most valuable?

The best features that AlgoSec offers include policy optimization. When I say optimization, the particular aspect I find most valuable is the policy cleanup and automation.

AlgoSec has positively impacted my organization by saving time, reducing errors, and making things easier for my team. I measured that positive impact by noticing both time savings and fewer human-related errors and the accuracy of our change. AlgoSec's accuracy and reliability of output have given me dependable results for firewall changes.

What needs improvement?

I am pretty happy with the product. Even small improvements that could make AlgoSec better would be streamlining the user interface a little bit to make it more intuitive.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AlgoSec is stable in my experience, and I have no issues with downtime or reliability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

AlgoSec's scalability has not presented any issues as my environment grows.

How are customer service and support?

Customer support has been very helpful when I have interacted with them.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using AlgoSec is to start from something simple, and then go to more orchestrated tasks like policy cleanup, policy streamlining, orchestration, and then finally automation. I would rate this review a 9 out of 10.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: Jun 3, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
AlgoSec
June 2026
Learn what your peers think about AlgoSec. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: June 2026.
902,894 professionals have used our research since 2012.
PeerSpot user
Cyber Security Analyst at a tech vendor with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 5
May 9, 2026
Automated firewall governance has reduced manual work and improves compliance across our hybrid network
Pros and Cons
  • "After implementing AlgoSec, firewall change requests that previously took days of manual review were often completed within hours, and the automation significantly reduced configuration errors and time spent preparing compliance audit reports."
  • "One area where AlgoSec could improve is the UI and UX because navigating complex workflows in policy analysis and reporting can feel heavy at times, especially for new users."

What is our primary use case?

Our main use case for AlgoSec is automating firewall policy management and compliance auditing across multiple firewall vendors, which helps us reduce manual rule reviews and improve visibility into network security changes.

We use AlgoSec to automate firewall rule change requests, so when an application team needs new network access, the tool analyzes the path, checks compliance risk, and helps implement the rule much faster than our previous manual approval process.

Besides firewall policy automation, we also use AlgoSec for compliance reporting and network visibility, which helps us identify unused or risky firewall rules and prepare for security audits more efficiently.

How has it helped my organization?

AlgoSec has improved our network security operations by reducing manual firewall management work, speeding up rule change approvals, and helping us maintain better compliance visibility across different security devices.

After implementing AlgoSec, firewall change requests that previously took days of manual review were often completed within hours, and the automation significantly reduced configuration errors and time spent preparing compliance audit reports.

What is most valuable?

The best features of AlgoSec in my experience are automated firewall rule analysis, risk and compliance reporting, application connectivity mapping, and multi-vendor firewall support because they make security policy management much faster and reduce manual errors from the networking.

The automated firewall rule analysis in AlgoSec helps our team quickly identify risky, unused, or conflicting rules before changes are implemented, which reduces manual review time and helps avoid security or connectivity issues during firewall updates.

One feature I also find very useful in AlgoSec is the application connectivity mapping because it gives clear visibility into how applications communicate across the network, which makes troubleshooting and migration planning much easier.

What needs improvement?

One area where AlgoSec could improve is the UI and UX because navigating complex workflows in policy analysis and reporting can feel heavy at times, especially for new users. Better dashboards, simplification, and faster drill-down into rule-level insights would make day-to-day operations smoother.

Another improvement for AlgoSec would be more intuitive reporting customization and faster integration setup for newer cloud-native environments, since aligning hybrid cloud policies sometimes requires extra effort and configuration tuning. Improving real-time change simulation and recommendations would also help, as the impact analysis could be even more interactive and easier for non-specialist teams to understand before a firewall rule is pushed.

One additional improvement for AlgoSec would be deeper native support for modern cloud-native services and Kubernetes environments because policy visibility and rule mapping in highly dynamic cloud workloads can still feel limited compared to traditional firewall environments.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AlgoSec for one year.

What was our ROI?

Overall, AlgoSec has been very effective for improving firewall governance, reducing manual effort in rule management, and strengthening compliance visibility across our hybrid network environment. It is especially valuable once the initial setup and network mapping are in place.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for anyone considering AlgoSec is to first map out your firewall and application dependencies clearly before implementation because the tool delivers the most value when your network inventory and policy structure are well-organized from the start. I would also recommend starting with a pilot on a small segment of your network and involving both security and network teams early, because AlgoSec works best when policies, firewalls, and application owners are aligned before scaling it across the full environment. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Last updated: May 9, 2026
Flag as inappropriate
PeerSpot user
reviewer2848809 - PeerSpot reviewer
Network Analyst at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jun 4, 2026
Firewall rule analysis has improved compliance and streamlined daily network checks
Pros and Cons
  • "AlgoSec has positively impacted my organization by helping us check and improve the rules, remove the oldest rules that don't have a match in Check Point, and clean up the rules that don't have a match."

    What is our primary use case?

    My main use case for AlgoSec is to check the rules in the Check Point firewall and a Cisco IOS device. My use case includes checking the rules from the Cisco IOS device.

    What is most valuable?

    The best features AlgoSec offers in my experience are network topology and compliance with the rules.

    AlgoSec's network topology visualization helps me in my daily work by providing a topology with many devices, so it helps us to check the correct rules.

    AlgoSec has positively impacted my organization by helping us check and improve the rules, remove the oldest rules that don't have a match in Check Point, and clean up the rules that don't have a match. After using AlgoSec, I noticed we agile the task and can reduce the risks while saving a lot of time. We saved a lot of time and fixed the mistakes in the rules, which is amazing.

    What needs improvement?

    I do not have an answer for how AlgoSec can be improved.

    Regarding AlgoSec's AI capabilities, I do not know about its governance and security. I do not use this feature yet.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I have been using AlgoSec for two years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    In my experience, AlgoSec is stable.

    How are customer service and support?

    I do not have any experience with the support team for AlgoSec.

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    I did not use a different solution before AlgoSec.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I do not have information about pricing, setup cost, and licensing; I am only a technical person.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    Before choosing AlgoSec, I did not evaluate other options; I do not know another option.

    What other advice do I have?

    My advice to others looking into using AlgoSec is to consider the time investment. My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. I would rate this product a 10.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    Last updated: Jun 4, 2026
    Flag as inappropriate
    PeerSpot user
    Shameerudheen Kp - PeerSpot reviewer
    Manager, MS Operations at NTT Security
    Real User
    Top 10
    Nov 13, 2024
    Easy to setup with good auto-implementation and good rule reviews
    Pros and Cons
    • "Both analysis and Implementation engines/features are found to be very much valuable since they helped the client to manage the show better."
    • "AlgoSec made our life easy."
    • "AlgoSec is slow when it is loaded with too many firewalls and policies."

    What is our primary use case?

    My client is from a finance background and has more than 100 firewall clusters deployed, that too from different OEMs, for added security. Thanks to historical reasons, some of the firewall policies are poorly managed with tons of rules, and nobody knows what policies are in use and what are not, what policies are redundant, and what are vulnerable.

    On top of this, the client Info-sec policy enforces strict one-to-one rules, which, considering the size of the business, leads to the implementation of hundreds of new policies every week.

    Firewall Rule analysis & New rule implementations were a challenge, and there comes the AlgoSec.

    How has it helped my organization?

    We started using AlgoSec to review existing firewall rules. To our surprise, thousands of policies were redundant, and many risky rules were also present.

    Due to their large rule bases, firewalls used to have high CPU usage during peak business hours. The client was able to remove redundant rules and strengthen risky rules to save the network from compromises.

    Implementing firewall rules was another challenge. The same rule had to be implemented on multiple firewalls from different OEMs. AlgoSec made our life easy.

    What is most valuable?

    Both analysis and Implementation engines/features are found to be very much valuable since they helped the client to manage the show better.

    Implementations used to take a long time, both in terms of approvals and manual implementations. Errors during implementation were another challenge. Delays in policy implementations impacted new feature rollouts or application developments. AlgoSec auto implementation came into the picture, which helped the right departments to approve policies and implementations.

    What needs improvement?

    AlgoSec is slow when it is loaded with too many firewalls and policies. A plan to take care of heavy usage is to be considered. Support of all firewalls and policy features to be enabled.

    AlgoSec should support in identifying most hit rules and re-ordering existing firewall rules - this is a very key to manage firewall CPU.

    A clustering of AlgoSec can also be considered. A group of AlgoSec servers managing large client bases geographically or datacenter-wise or function-wise. A head reporting unit and child processing units.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I've used the solution for seven years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    The stability is good.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    The solution needs to improve scalability.

    How are customer service and support?

    The customer service is good.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Positive

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    No other solution used before.

    How was the initial setup?

    The initial setup was straightforward.

    What about the implementation team?

    The implementation was handled in-house.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    I am into operations and not aware of cost or pricing. 

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    AlgoSec was the only option considered.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    Security adviser at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    Top 10
    Mar 25, 2025
    Offers robust automation and risk assessment while user interface and cloud adoption need updates
    Pros and Cons
    • "I rate the scalability at nine out of ten, demonstrating a robust ability to expand and cater to large enterprises."
    • "The user interface for AlgoSec has remained unchanged for the last ten years and could benefit from being more interactive and informative."

    What is our primary use case?

    I used AlgoSec for risk assessment and managing firewall rules, including risk assessment and firewall policy automation.

    What is most valuable?

    My use of AlgoSec included the FireFlow module, which is a firewall automation tool. Additionally, AlgoSec's risk analysis module was beneficial.

    What needs improvement?

    The user interface for AlgoSec has remained unchanged for the last ten years and could benefit from being more interactive and informative. Additionally, a cloud offering as a SaaS would relieve the burden of managing hardware, applying numerous patches, and monitoring the health state of the solution. Implementing a SaaS service would allow for immediate value realization.

    For how long have I used the solution?

    I used AlgoSec from 2020 to 2025, approximately four to five years.

    What do I think about the stability of the solution?

    I rate the stability at eight out of ten, indicating a reasonably stable solution.

    What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

    I rate the scalability at nine out of ten, demonstrating a robust ability to expand and cater to large enterprises.

    How are customer service and support?

    I rate customer service at six or seven out of ten. Both response time and quality need improvements. While there is a dedicated engineer program that provides consistent support, regular support without this subscription is lacking.

    How would you rate customer service and support?

    Neutral

    Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

    At my previous company, I used AlgoSec but shifted to using Tufin in my current role.

    How was the initial setup?

    The setup process for AlgoSec is fairly simple.

    What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

    Pricing for AlgoSec is fairly competitive. Rating the pricing on a scale from one being high to ten being low, the price is considered competitive without being specified absolutely.

    Which other solutions did I evaluate?

    I currently work with Tufin and have observed that AlgoSec is slower in adopting new technologies like cloud compared to Tufin and FireMon. Tufin and FireMon are leaders in technology change adoption.

    What other advice do I have?

    My overall rating for AlgoSec, based on my last experience in January, would be seven out of ten. AlgoSec is suitable for enterprises that manage about 300 firewalls, and the burden on the solution is more about the number of firewalls and policies managed rather than the number of users. For technical functionality, I find Palo Alto to be better since AlgoSec does not support time-based objects or specific categorization groups.

    Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

    On-premises
    Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
    PeerSpot user
    Digital Technology Analyst Ii at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
    Real User
    Top 5
    Jun 3, 2026
    Change verification has improved security and streamlines approvals across teams
    Pros and Cons
    • "AlgoSec has positively impacted my organization by making the change process smoother for verifying who made what change at a specific time."

      What is our primary use case?

      My main use case for AlgoSec is to tighten security. I use AlgoSec to verify configuration changes before I make them in the network.

      What is most valuable?

      The best features AlgoSec offers include the verification of existing changes before we deploy new ones out into the network.

      This feature helps my team day to day by resolving duplicate changes that would take place otherwise.

      AlgoSec has positively impacted my organization by making the change process smoother for verifying who made what change at a specific time.

      Once we create a change, it is propagated to other departments for verification and approval before the change is made, which ensures everyone is aware of the change.

      What needs improvement?

      AlgoSec currently fulfills all of our needs. It would be beneficial to have increased ease of use for beginning users or a training tutorial.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been using AlgoSec for two years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      AlgoSec is stable.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      I do not know how AlgoSec's scalability is.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      The solution that was previously used by another team had details that I do not know.

      What other advice do I have?

      My advice to others looking into using AlgoSec is to have a virtual test platform to test functionality for company use before implementation. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      Last updated: Jun 3, 2026
      Flag as inappropriate
      PeerSpot user
      Tony Augé  - PeerSpot reviewer
      EXPERT OUTILS SYSTEMES ET RESEAUX at AG2R LA MONDIALE
      User
      Top 20
      Oct 31, 2024
      Analyzes network flows with good functionality and clear insights
      Pros and Cons
      • "One of the most valuable features we've found in AlgoSec is its ability to analyze network flows to help define new, less permissive rules. This functionality is crucial for enhancing our network's security posture by ensuring that only necessary traffic is allowed."
      • "One specific area that could benefit from improvement is the rule analysis feature, particularly in terms of defining objects within a new rule. Currently, the process seems to be more focused on network-level analysis rather than on objects, which sometimes requires us to perform multiple iterations to achieve optimal results."

      What is our primary use case?

      In our company, we primarily use AlgoSec to analyze and optimize firewall policies. This solution is invaluable for cleaning up rules and objects. It allows us to identify which rules are redundantly covered by others, detect unused objects in rules or groups, and pinpoint duplicated objects. Additionally, AlgoSec aids us in reducing overly permissive rules that have accumulated due to legacy changes.

      Our environment consists of several systems with different policies, all managed under a single management console. This unified approach helps us maintain a clean and efficient object rule base across the board. 

      By using AlgoSec, we can ensure our firewall settings are both streamlined and effective, significantly enhancing our security posture. Furthermore, the insights provided by AlgoSec empower us to make informed decisions about which rules are necessary and which can be consolidated or removed, ultimately optimizing our network performance and security management process.

      How has it helped my organization?

      AlgoSec has significantly improved our organization by streamlining our firewall management process. With the use of AlgoSec FireFlow and AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer (AFA), we have been able to maintain clean and efficient firewall policies. AFA has been instrumental in helping us clean up existing firewall rules, ensuring that our policies are optimized and free of redundancies. By identifying and removing obsolete or duplicate rules, we have improved our network's security and performance.

      FireFlow has been particularly beneficial in automating policy change processes, allowing us to keep our firewall policies clean and up-to-date. This automation not only reduces the potential for human error but also speeds up the implementation of necessary changes.

      AlgoSec has saved us considerable time and energy when it comes to various tasks, such as risk analysis and assessing the impact of potential changes. By providing clear insights into which rules are already implemented and effective, we can focus our efforts on areas that truly need attention, ensuring our resources are used efficiently. Overall, AlgoSec's solutions have optimized our security management, enhancing both our operational efficiency and our ability to protect critical assets.

      What is most valuable?

      One of the most valuable features we've found in AlgoSec is its ability to analyze network flows to help define new, less permissive rules. This functionality is crucial for enhancing our network's security posture by ensuring that only necessary traffic is allowed. By examining the actual traffic flows within our network, AlgoSec provides insights into where existing rules may be too permissive, allowing us to tighten them without disrupting legitimate business operations.

      This feature not only assists in making our security policies more precise but also helps in minimizing the attack surface by restricting unnecessary access. As a result, we can confidently implement rules that align more closely with the principle of least privilege while still accommodating essential connectivity and services. The ability to refine our firewall rules in this informed manner enhances both our security and compliance efforts, making this feature particularly valuable to our organization.

      What needs improvement?

      While AlgoSec offers robust capabilities, there are areas where the product could be further enhanced. One specific area that could benefit from improvement is the rule analysis feature, particularly in terms of defining objects within a new rule. Currently, the process seems to be more focused on network-level analysis rather than on objects, which sometimes requires us to perform multiple iterations to achieve optimal results.

      Enhancing the tool to provide more object-oriented analysis could streamline the process of rule creation and modification, allowing for more precise and efficient policy management. Additionally, incorporating advanced capabilities for identifying and recommending the most appropriate objects for new rules would minimize manual effort and potential errors, thereby increasing accuracy and saving time.

      For future releases, we would like to see more seamless integration between AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer (AFA) and FireFlow. Enhancing the connectivity between these tools would simplify transitioning from AFA to FireFlow, making it easier to create change tickets directly. This improvement would streamline our change management processes, enabling us to implement and monitor policy changes more efficiently and with greater accuracy.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I've used the solution for six months.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?


      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      On-premises
      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      PeerSpot user
      reviewer1469877 - PeerSpot reviewer
      Sr. Consutant at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees
      Real User
      Top 5Leaderboard
      Apr 17, 2026
      Automated change auditing has transformed incident resolution and simplifies compliance reporting
      Pros and Cons
      • "The impact of AlgoSec on my organization has been positive, as manual intervention has completely decreased because when the compliance or legal team comes to us asking about what changes happened in the last quarter or two quarters, it used to be a manual task, and now we can export the logs within a few minutes by selecting the target device and the time period for the changes, making it very much less time-consuming and more productive."
      • "I would like to see automation support on AlgoSec, allowing me to run scripts and API calls to export whatever I need."

      What is our primary use case?

      AlgoSec's primary use case is for change auditing and change monitoring on security devices. It helps in receiving regular alerts about changes happening on devices, making it much easier to audit those changes, identify any issues, and figure out which recent changes caused them.

      We experienced a critical issue when our perimeter firewall, which was a Check Point firewall, was not processing traffic. All traffic through our data center going towards the internet and requests coming from the internet to our data center were not working, creating a complete outage situation. To identify what caused it, I verified the AlgoSec logs through the auditing functionality and checked the recently made changes that might have caused the issue. This helped us determine what changes were made recently. We rolled back those changes, and the issue was fixed without spending more time on troubleshooting.

      AlgoSec also helps us in auditing. We have auditing happening every year, and we track what changes we make, what the change requests were against those particular changes, and ensure that changes had required approvals in place, making overall auditing and compliance easier for us.

      What is most valuable?

      The standout feature of AlgoSec is real-time monitoring and alerting. We receive emails for every change that happens on any of the devices, with the ability to customize the email and integrate it with ticketing tools to review whether a change request was raised or not. AlgoSec also provides historical auditing of the devices with changes, allowing us to store logs at an external syslog.

      In my day-to-day work, I rely most often on real-time monitoring and change auditing.

      The impact of AlgoSec on my organization has been positive. Manual intervention has completely decreased because when the compliance or legal team comes to us asking about what changes happened in the last quarter or two quarters, it used to be a manual task. Now we can export the logs within a few minutes by selecting the target device and the time period for the changes, making it very much less time-consuming and more productive.

      What needs improvement?

      I would like to see automation support on AlgoSec, allowing me to run scripts and API calls to export whatever I need.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been using AlgoSec for more than two years, and I also used it in my earlier experience when I was part of previous companies.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      AlgoSec is quite stable in my experience with no downtime or reliability issues.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      AlgoSec handles growth well, demonstrating good scalability.

      How are customer service and support?

      When we are unable to export audit logs for a specific firewall or device, we raise the case with their support team and receive timely help from them. I can give the customer support a rating of ten. Although I did not have many requests, I received timely assistance whenever I raised a case.

      Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

      We did not use a different solution earlier, but we did explore various products while selecting AlgoSec. Before choosing AlgoSec, we evaluated a few options, including NetMRI as one of the solutions.

      What was our ROI?

      I have seen a return on investment with AlgoSec. It is a complete time-saver, reducing the workload on the individual or team and enabling them to invest that time into more productive tasks.

      What other advice do I have?

      If you are looking for an auditing tool to check or audit the changes happening around your network devices or security devices, and you want to export auditing logs or track changes, you should definitely evaluate AlgoSec. I would rate this review a nine out of ten.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      Private Cloud

      If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

      Other
      Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
      Last updated: Apr 17, 2026
      Flag as inappropriate
      PeerSpot user
      Guy Soudant - PeerSpot reviewer
      CISO at a real estate/law firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
      Real User
      Jun 26, 2023
      A highly customizable tool that significantly reduces human error
      Pros and Cons
      • "Customizability is AlgoSec's best feature."
      • "The interface is more on the complex side."

      What is our primary use case?

      We use app flow, Firewall Analyzer, and FireFlow. We use AlgoSec to gain visibility on firewall rules and for gap-cleaning projects to clean up the firewalls. We also use the solution as a firewall assurance tool to stay clean, have an optimized set of firewalls, and then automate firewall rules deployed from start to finish.

      We have on-prem data centers and 180 sites all over the world.

      Additionally, we use cloud services, infrastructure as a service, platform as a service, and software as a service. The majority of it is standardized on Cisco networking with Fortinet security solutions, except for the data centers, which are Check Point.

      The purpose is to gain visibility into firewall rules. We used it to go through a gap-cleaning project to clean up the firewalls. We also use the solution as a firewall assurance tool to stay clean and to have optimized firewall rules. In addition, we use the solution to automate firewall rule deployment from start to finish, so we have a complete change process in FireFlow and can automatically deploy the firewalls on appliances. For that, we also built a connection with BMC Remedy because that's the main tool used for change management.

      How has it helped my organization?

      AlgoSec has improved our organization through a safer firewall rule base and better time-to-market IT services provided to the rest of the organization. Those are the two main improvements. In general, AlgoSec has provided a better security posture.

      What is most valuable?

      Customizability is AlgoSec's best feature. You can customize everything and build anything you like, and that's a feature we missed in competitors' solutions.

      What needs improvement?

      AlgoSec is not a tool where people with little knowledge of security or IT can find their way around. AlgoSec has a less user-friendly interface compared to competitors, but it is comparatively more customizable. As such, the interface is more on the complex side.

      For how long have I used the solution?

      I have been using AlgoSec for four years.

      What do I think about the stability of the solution?

      AlgoSec is a stable solution. There are bugs, but those do not affect the system's stability. We have not had any unplanned downtime since we started.

      We use the solution 24x7 to record cyber rules, with about 50 changes per week.

      What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

      The solution is scalable and we have approximately 50 users.

      How was the initial setup?

      The initial deployment was complex because we were integrating with ITIL systems since we had integrated with BMC Remedy. The integration with Check Point was complex because we were on the wrong version. We had to go through various administrative processes to update Check Point. If AlgoSec was more flexible in the ways one could integrate and the versions one could integrate it with, that would help.

      A team of ten people handled the deployment, including testers, and they took approximately three months. The end-to-end deployment took just over two years. We did not migrate from a previous solution.

      What was our ROI?

      We have seen a return on investment only with efficiency gains and improved security posture. That might transfer to a monetary value, but we haven't assessed that.

      What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

      I find the price too expensive. It looks a bit like SAP, so it does have standard functionality out of the box, but you will spend a lot of money if you want to customize it. However, the price is not as extreme as SAP or Oracle, but the actual implementation does turn out to be expensive. 

      Which other solutions did I evaluate?

      We finally chose AlgoSec over Skybox for its customizability, the options for integration, and the workflows. Though Skybox was much more user-friendly, it was weaker when it came to integration options and customizability.

      What other advice do I have?

      In our organization, we work with multiple security vendors, and integrating with leading vendors for the most part is easy, but there are some exceptions. The solution made integration with the majority of devices really easy, but it was really cumbersome with some devices.

      The solution has massively reduced human error through automation by about 95%.

      As far as multiple environments are concerned, we have a private cloud, which is just a data center hosted by an external party. We have a public cloud, multiple vendors, and multiple regions. We also have decentralized data centers throughout the world.

      We're investigating combining the solution with Cisco ACI.

      The cost versus the achieved business goals is in balance.

      I recommend that new users do a proof-of-concept before choosing AlgoSec. I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

      Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

      Hybrid Cloud

      If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

      Other
      Disclosure: PeerSpot contacted the reviewer to collect the review and to validate authenticity. The reviewer was referred by the vendor, but the review is not subject to editing or approval by the vendor.
      PeerSpot user
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
      Updated: June 2026
      Buyer's Guide
      Download our free AlgoSec Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.