Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Share your experience using Pandora FMS

The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.

Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.

Your review helps others learn about this solution
The PeerSpot community is built upon trust and sharing with peers.
It's good for your career
In today's digital world, your review shows you have valuable expertise.
You can influence the market
Vendors read their reviews and make improvements based on your feedback.
Examples of the 98,000+ reviews on PeerSpot:

Tchidat Linda - PeerSpot reviewer
Engineer of Telecommunication at Gold Telecom
Real User
Top 5
Simple to use with a quick setup
Pros and Cons
  • "The initial setup was very quick. The first time it was long because I didn't know it yet. I was only using Windows. The first time was very difficult because of the operating system."
  • "My company wanted to do an exercise command to access IT from Cameroon. They wanted to access an FSS to a second host with second equipment that was on another coast but it is not possible on Zabbix to do it. They want to directly access from the front-end of Zabbix to access a prompt in Zabbix to an access terminal. In the front-end, there is no way to do that. That would be an important improvement."

What is our primary use case?

We needed a tool to know what the space inside of the infrastructure is like. My work was to use Zabbix to get information about the IT infrastructure in the village or in the towns that are very far from the headquarters. I had to use Zabbix to provide information with maps that the IT was working and so that the headquarters can see in real-time what the healyh of the IT infrastructure we had deployed in the electrical network is.

After this experience, I tried Zabbix in african organization based in my country and it was used to monitor the IT infrastructures in three countries, cameroon, benin and ivory coast. For the moment, Zabbix is not yet very popular here but I really appreciate it and really want to make people know that it's very simple to use. 

In 2023 i tried Zabbix 6.0 on Rocky Linux 9. And news features like pdf report have improved my Admin Sys routine.

How has it helped my organization?

Zabbix has improved the daily monitoring tasks by making them easier and faster.

What is most valuable?

The feature that I find most valuable is the stateful map. In fact, the Zabbix map designing tools permit to make monitoring stateful maps with topologies similar to the reals IT network maps.

What needs improvement?

My company wanted to do an exercise command to access IT from Cameroon. They wanted to access an FSS to a second host with second equipment that was on another coast but it is not possible on Zabbix to do it. They want to directly access from the front-end of Zabbix to access a prompt in Zabbix to an access terminal. In the front-end, there is no way to do that. That would be an important improvement. 

For how long have I used the solution?

II have been using this product for seven years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very scalable because I tried version 5. I used 5 from 0 and I see that they have improved many things, but there is not yet this option to have an access terminal where you have many functionalities. 

The scalability works fine because the community is very active. When a new version comes out, we can see that they have tried to add.

How are customer service and support?

The technical support is very quick. When I have a problem and I post it in the community, they answer me very quickly. For now, i don't need any technical support. 

How would you rate customer service and support?

Positive

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

In fact, even if I have looked at Nagios first, before Zabbix I did not really use it or any other monitoring solution.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was very quick. The first time it was long because I didn't know it yet. I was only using Windows. The first time was very difficult because of the operating system. 

What about the implementation team?

I implement Zabbix in-house with as outsourcing offficials webs tutorials

What was our ROI?

Zabbix exploitation has dispensed with financing frequent visits to the technical area through alerts, notifications, and stateful maps. Thus, the return on investment is more than 100%.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Zabbix is an effective cheaper network monitoring solution because it doesn't need any ongoing cost due to licensing.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Zabbix, we evaluated Nagios but we were not comfortable with notifications messages syntax and configurations.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend Zabbix to people who want to monitor a simple network.

I have found that the literature on the website is not very easy for some people. They want to be in those to read more about Zabbix, how to install it, and what the normal problems are.

I would rate it a nine out of ten. 

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Network Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Has delivered accurate WAN capacity insights but needs better dashboard customization for complex data
Pros and Cons
  • "PRTG Network Monitor is perhaps the most accurate tool we have used to monitor the capacity of the WAN connection."
  • "The most significant disadvantage of PRTG Network Monitor is that the dashboard for NetFlow is not user-friendly at all."

What is our primary use case?

I use PRTG Network Monitor for network monitoring, specifically monitoring the capacity of the WAN connections.

What is most valuable?

PRTG Network Monitor is perhaps the most accurate tool we have used to monitor the capacity of the WAN connection.

Real-time notifications in PRTG Network Monitor are effective in reducing response time; it's a very good product on this point.

The reporting capabilities in PRTG Network Monitor are good. Both built-in reporting and notification features are good for us, and we are utilizing these features, which are satisfying us.

What needs improvement?

Customization is not the biggest advantage of PRTG Network Monitor, though it remains the most accurate tool.

Customization options are limited when creating a dashboard with specific needs.

The most significant disadvantage of PRTG Network Monitor is that the dashboard for NetFlow is not user-friendly at all.

The dashboard for NetFlow in PRTG Network Monitor presents data in a complex way, making it difficult to extract the information needed.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using PRTG Network Monitor for almost 10 years now. While I don't remember the exact start date, it has been a long time.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

PRTG Network Monitor is a completely stable product. We haven't needed vendor support for the last three years, which demonstrates the product's stability.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

PRTG Network Monitor is easy to scale up and scale out, making it a scalable solution.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I have not worked with similar tools for network monitoring; we have retired all other tools except PRTG Network Monitor.

How was the initial setup?

The installation of PRTG Network Monitor is very easy.

What was our ROI?

We see ROI with PRTG Network Monitor through indirect cost savings. It provides accurate data for utilization, allowing us to monitor and optimize our investments in WAN connection capacity.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

PRTG Network Monitor remains affordable until now.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I decided to stay with PRTG Network Monitor because Cisco Prime has been retired from the vendor and is no longer supported. There is no business need for WhatsUp since we don't require map monitoring anymore. Additionally, we are working with SD-WAN technology, which provides more monitoring capability within the solution itself, reducing the need for external tools.

What other advice do I have?

I am just a user of PRTG Network Monitor. On a scale of 1-10, I rate this solution a 7.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Flag as inappropriate