The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
My main use case for Claude for Enterprise is building multiple workflows, which can be coded ones. For example, I am working on an operational workflow that manages daily deliveries for the business and ensures nothing is missed. I have used Claude code to create automation for the franchisee stores of the business, and I also make sure that things are not missed.
One of the best features Claude for Enterprise offers is that there is no competitor for Claude in creating workflows at a very fast level. Whatever I want to build is completed very quickly and at a very proficient level.
Claude for Enterprise has positively impacted my organization because, as the only technical person for this business, using Claude code improves my efficiency significantly. My time consumption is heavily reduced. Rather than using any other platform, it would take me considerably more time, and the accuracy would not be as good as what Claude delivers. The reduction in time consumption makes it more possible for me to work on different solutions.
I normally say that if I had to code on any other platform to build a system, it would have taken me at least three to four weeks. With Claude for Enterprise, it has been completed in less than a week. So I save around three weeks' time for a use case.
The biggest frustration for me regarding Claude for Enterprise is the pricing and credit consumption. Even for small changes, it consumes more credits than any other competitive platform. If there are more credits, the cost increases. I believe that is definitely a factor. Claude for Enterprise has done an exceptional job in delivering all the right things except for the pricing, because it comes with a good amount of cost. If it could ensure that small changes consume fewer credits, that would be helpful.
My final thoughts on Claude for Enterprise are that with the growing use of automations, if Claude for Enterprise could come up with a no-code solution—currently it uses credits to code things—but if it could be a drag-and-drop type of solution, as other competitors such as Make.com or n8n offer, I believe that would be a huge advancement. Currently it is usable for even non-technical people, as they just have to use it with prompts, but if it were structured with a drag-and-drop method to create automation, it would be even more cost-effective and faster than coding it and finding the debugging parts.
I have been familiar with Claude for Enterprise for around six months.
My advice to someone considering Claude for Enterprise is to first understand prompting. I recommend trying as much as possible to get everything in a single prompt so that you do not use multiple prompts for smaller things, which consumes more credits in the end. Understanding prompting is very important before you use Claude for Enterprise. Second, I would recommend understanding how the credits work, including what tasks consume how much of the credits, so that you can get an idea of the costs before jumping into the paid version. I gave this review a rating of eight out of ten.
Ada is a healthcare software that provides disease identification based on your symptoms. I receive many symptoms and questions from patients about their conditions because they want to book a visit and provide the reason for their visit. I have used it a couple of times to check what my son is going through when he had a fever and many different conditions. I put the symptom in, and it was pretty accurate.
The best features Ada offers in my experience include asking for the age, the symptom, and the frequency of the symptoms. Ada gives a couple of options based on priority, such as what could be the disease or condition, and it has a wide list and better options, which is very helpful.
Ada has positively impacted my organization as I work on the provider directory by re-routing based on patient symptoms to determine which patient should go to which doctor. Ada provides suggestions in the provider directory, and routed appointments are directed to the right provider based on specialty and super specialty.
Ada can be improved by being able to identify symptoms based on the age, and it needs to have more questionnaire options. Additionally, the speed of the application should be improved.
I have been using Ada for probably six to seven years.
Ada is stable in my experience.
Ada's scalability is something we are currently dealing with as we are scaling right now with the provider directory, according to which they can pre-fill those questions.
There is no customer support because we are using it internally.
I have never used a different solution before Ada.
I have not yet seen the return on investment with Ada as we recently started with it.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was pretty reasonable based on the input and the questionnaire.
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Ada.
My advice for others looking into using Ada is to provide as much information as possible, including the severity of the symptoms and the age. I would rate this review as an 8 out of 10.
