Share your experience using Acquia Cloud

I use Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services for user experience and user interface design work on my new platform called Apex.

Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services supported me in building a unified design system using a comprehensive component library with Material UI and custom extensions. They helped lead the design and iterated on various modules within my Apex platform. Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services provided key deliverables that included complete design specifications, interactive prototypes, reusable component libraries, and a white-label design system for my future Apex platform.

Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services supported me in building a unified design system using a comprehensive component library with Material UI and custom extensions. They helped lead the design and iterated on various modules within my Apex platform. They provided high-fidelity Figma prototypes and validated the prototypes with the product owners and actual users.

Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services offers dependability, on-schedule delivery of designs as requested, and the ability to work effectively and align with the technical teams.

Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services helps improve communication and articulates the details of the designs very effectively in my day-to-day work.

Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services has been an important component in my platform development and my user experience strategy.

I have noticed much improved product owner acceptance and designs that are well accepted by the user community since working with Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services.

I do not have any feedback for improvements regarding Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services.

I have been using Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services for the last two years.

My overall rating for Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services customer service is five out of five.

Positive

Valere's Infrastructure and Managed Services excels when they understand my operational context. They facilitate and improve my team communications and collaboration. They do an excellent job of establishing a clear decision-making process and iterative approaches, and work very effectively with product owners and technical teams. I would rate this review a ten out of ten.

My main use case for Contentstack is in a website where I want dynamic content, such as websites based on text and images. Dynamic, multi-language content is also required in a website, along with fast content delivery for SEO purposes, and many other use cases where I will use Contentstack in websites.

In a previous project, I used Contentstack where the client wanted all the content of the site, including all text, headings, images, and videos to be dynamic without requiring any technical developers. We used Contentstack to create all the pages and components dynamically. Everything, including background images, content, and videos, was made dynamic so that if a client wants to update it, they can directly go to the Contentstack dashboard, update there, and it automatically applies on the live site within seconds. Our website supports multi-language options where the same page and components can have content managed language-wise in the Contentstack dashboard.

Overall, Contentstack works well for managing and delivering content. I mainly use it to keep content separate from the front end, which makes updates easier and helps the development team work effectively. It allows us to manage our website content in one place, making it easy for our team to create, update, and publish pages quickly. We also appreciate that we can reuse the same content across different pages and channels, which makes it more organized.

Contentstack offers great features including various content types, entries, and assets, the ability to create reusable components, multi-language support, flexible content modeling, a good API, SDK support, use in websites or applications, excellent customer support, an easy editor, and overall ease of use for non-technical users.

Our most used feature is Content Type and Entries because it stands out, allowing us to set up a structure once and then reuse it for many pages, where our content team just fills in the fields and publishes without needing any coding. This keeps everything consistent and saves us a lot of time.

Contentstack has positively impacted our organization by making our work much faster. Our content team can now update and publish pages independently without waiting for the developer, which frees up our developers to focus on bigger tasks. This ensures that our content is more consistent across the site and allows us to launch new pages much quicker than before while also being SEO friendly.

While Contentstack has great features, it is a bit expensive, and there is a learning curve involved for complex content models. Some UI features feel limited, which are some cons of Contentstack.

Contentstack can be improved in several ways. I would like to see a more intuitive UI, better documentation for advanced use cases, and easier debugging for API or content delivery issues. Additionally, optimizing pricing and simplifying live preview setups requiring developer efforts would be beneficial.

Regarding needed improvements, while the pricing is high, especially for smaller teams, simplifying live preview setup requiring some developer efforts would be great. There is a bit of a learning curve for new users when content models get complex, so better guides or templates for beginners would really help.

I have been using Contentstack for the last three years.

Contentstack is stable.

The scalability of Contentstack is really good. As our content and traffic grow, we do not face any performance issues, and it is easy to add new pages and languages even before the website becomes large scale.

Customer support with Contentstack is really good. I would rate customer support a nine.

Before Contentstack, we used WordPress because it was becoming hard to manage as we grew, requiring many plugins and maintenance. It was inflexible in using content across different channels. Contentstack provided us with faster, more modern, headless setups that are easier for both our content team and developers.

We have seen a return on investment from using Contentstack, mainly through time saved on content updates. Our developers do not need to handle every small content change, reducing development efforts and helping the team move faster, though we do not have a specific ROI percentage at this time.

We evaluated a few options before choosing Contentstack, mainly Contentful and Strapi, but we chose Contentstack because it was easier for our content team to use, had a better workflow, and its multi-language feature was a significant advantage. Furthermore, the support team was really good.

My advice to others looking into using Contentstack is to plan your content structure well before you start. Spend time designing your content types properly so that everything is easier later. Involve both your developers and content team early to ensure the setup works well for everyone, and utilize the support team as they are really helpful during the onboarding process.

Overall, we are really happy with Contentstack as it has made our content work faster, easier, and more organized. I would rate this product an eight.