We primarily use this solution in a mixed environment having web and desktop applications, integrating with each other and over an API Gateway. API based and Financial Services portal testing created using modern technology using C# and ReactJS.
The easiest route - we'll conduct a 15 minute phone interview and write up the review for you.
Use our online form to submit your review. It's quick and you can post anonymously.
We primarily use this solution in a mixed environment having web and desktop applications, integrating with each other and over an API Gateway. API based and Financial Services portal testing created using modern technology using C# and ReactJS.
- Brought a good environment of test automation
- Allowed a significant increase in Continuous Integration
- Great User Interface and ease of checking all your artifacts of Testing.
- Makes optimal use of Model-based Test practice in getting Object-references from the application.
- Script-less, so less maintenance headache for non-technical users also.
- Drag and drop functionality to create and re-use your Test Cases
- Excellent re-use of Excel functionality for formulas and functions.
- Conditions which let the test case branch off from the Template. Helps work out different scenarios for data.
- Has been tried out on SAP, Oracle Apps, and IBM COGNOS BI applications. With a few tweaks works well with these applications.
- IF and LOOP statements introduced with the latest version.
- Improved performance of Web-Based Tests. WHILE LOOP and IF made better and more responsive with added error recovery options.
- Intuitive based options available, along with a rudimentary record and play functionality.
- Next version will even have the visualization tools required to see the interconnections between the TCD and the Test Cases, along with the workflow in the TCD and Tests.
- New and improved visualization for multiple browsers and a totally new Wizard with TBox out of Box support has been added to the (v9.2) of TOSCA Commander.
- Access to Business Intelligence (BI) features of comparing a DB to another one, also have been added as plugins.
- Access to an Analytical Engine to view and get reports from the Test Runs.
- Version 13 has also brought in BI testing and improvements on SAP Test scenarios
- Upgrades to the newer version if extra Add-ins are installed sometimes causes weird issues.
- Needs a UI to be open and present when running the tests. Cannot visit the DOM like in Selenium.
- Needs a UI to visualize the test case development.
I have used it for the past nine years.
None seen as such, except it has a reliance on the Network for Licenses. If the network is lost, then the license will expire and crash/close the application.
The scalability depends on the Licensing model you take up.
Customer Service:
Excellent almost 16x5 service with issue resolution within a given 24-hour time frame.
Technical Support:
- Great Customer Support, technical from the first step.
I have been using HP QTP and Selenium for Test Automation. Switch was mainly due to Team constraints and management wanting to try a new tool which is easier for the Business Analysts also to collaborate with.
Setup is simple but requires learning of the tool and how it does things before you can optimally use it.
We had an in-house implementation.
We have seen an exceptionally good ROI, as we reduced the number of Tests from 4000 to around 89 scenario's which can be run in an automated manner with additional data (so in actuality we have around 1.4M tests, which can theoretically be run without human intervention). We have a full-stack CI pipeline for running these along with JIRA (requirement gathering and test results per Story), to the final TeamCity run for each check-in to the Dev branch.
Pricing is steep if you go for the premium model. My advice would be to buy a mix of licenses, depending on the need. The Tricentis Sales are rather good at helping you with this, once you give the intent to buy. They are not just shoving you the highest premium toy/license.
Take the online training on Udemy before you confirm the intent to buy it.
During our last conversation, I mentioned that I have experience with OpenText Functional Testing.
I have had experience working with OpenText Functional Testing for three years.
We use OpenText Functional Testing for functional testing and UI testing using UFT.
In my organization, OpenText Functional Testing is deployed on-premises.
The best features of OpenText Functional Testing include descriptive programming, the ability to add objects in the repository, and its ease of use for UI compared to other tools. It also supports VB Scripting, where we can use our data structure skills in the tool to solve complex functional testing.
OpenText Functional Testing is a scalable solution. Users can buy licenses and expand resources widely in their organization. With more licenses, testing capabilities can be expanded.
Areas of OpenText Functional Testing that have room for improvement include having an option to store objects in the public repository when using Object Spy and adding objects, as it currently stores them locally. Additionally, there are hanging issues where it becomes unresponsive, which can be improved.
I have had experience working with OpenText Functional Testing for three years.
OpenText Functional Testing is a stable solution. We have been using it for three years without facing any major issues.
OpenText Functional Testing is a stable solution. We have been using it for three years without facing any major issues.
OpenText Functional Testing is a scalable solution. Users can buy licenses and expand resources widely in their organization. With more licenses, testing capabilities can be expanded.
I would rate technical support for OpenText Functional Testing around seven to eight on a scale from one to ten.
I am not interested in this course or taking this course, so I do not know the purpose of this call.
The initial setup of OpenText Functional Testing is not hard; it is easy. Users just need to have the knowledge to install the packages and then add those add-ins.
I am working in an organization that has a partnership with OpenText, though I am not sure what kind of partnership or relationship my organization has with OpenText.
I have no idea about the pricing of OpenText Functional Testing. The organization handles the pricing and investments.
My company name is Agilent Technologies Incorporated, and my title is Engineer. My email address is mirza.h@non.agilent.com.
Regarding AI integration in OpenText Functional Testing, we currently use AI features where we do not need to identify objects; we just need to write the text in the AI, and it will find the button wherever it is on that page. It would be great to have AI-driven analytics or predictive models improving test accuracy, but I would want to understand exactly what that does and how it helps functional testing.
I rate OpenText Functional Testing an 8 out of 10.
