No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Checkmarx vs Parasoft

Unbiased reviews from our professional community. A complete perspective on vendors based on user input.
Checkmarx
Based on 114 reviews.
Parasoft
Based on 50 reviews.
Latest Research
Overview
Information Not Available
Parasoft is an independent software vendor with headquarters in Monrovia, California. It was founded in 1987 by five graduates of the California Institute of Technology Parasoft develops automated defect prevention technologies that support the Automated Defect Prevention methodology developed by Adam Kolawa. For cloud, SOA, APIs, and enterprise IT environments, Parasoft technologies automate practices such as integration testing, system testing, load testing, and penetration testing.
Sample Customers
Checkmarx One
YIT, Salesforce, Coca-Cola, SAP, U.S. Army, Liveperson, Playtech Case Study: Liveperson Implements Innovative Secure SDLC
Parasoft SOAtest
Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
Parasoft Jtest
General Motors, CIBC, General Dynamics, WoodmenLife, Norfolk Southern, Lockheed Martin, Penske Truck Leasing, Boeing, Pratt & Whitney, Gallup, Leonardo
Popular Solutions
Top Industries
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Construction Company
9%
Computer Software Company
6%
Quotes From Member Reviews
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Most Helpful Reviews
Review 1 of 4
Review 1 of 3
Customer Service
Review 1 of 30
Review 1 of 30
Technical Support
No Data Available
No Data Available
We monitor all reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.