Talend Open Studio [EOL] Reviews

I primarily use the solution for integration. I consolidate data from several different databases and spreadsheets and merge systems into Amazon Redshift.

The solution has a good balance between automated items and the ability for a developer to integrate and extend what he needs. Other competing tools do not offer the same grade of flexibility when you need to go beyond what is provided by the tool. Talend, on the other hand, allows you to expand very easily.

We have a good integration with Artifactory and a good integration with GitHub. 

I don't see the need for anything. At the moment, Talend is a good complete product while at the same time not being overwhelming.

What I really don't like is the TAC, which is the Talent Administration Console. It's currently slow, old technology. It's obsolete and ugly to use. The studio is great, whereas TAC is on the other side of the spectrum. Actually, in AWS, in many cases, we are ditching the TAC and we are using Amazon-provided services, like Lambda functions, to code the Talend files produced by Talend Studio.

The server-side should be completely revamped.

I've been dealing with the solution for more than three years.

There are two pairs of version keys that parallelize, which is not available in the free version. However, when you can parallelize your jobs you can achieve a good degree of scalability. This is one of the points where Talend shines compared to, for example, Informatica. Informatica is designed to do one record at a time. It requires expert support and general competence in the product.

Talend, by default, can be very efficient, especially using the bulk load and bulk insert components, which, at the moment we are using. We are moving to approximately 10 terabytes of data daily. Notwithstanding the load, we had to tweak very, very little. Using standard components we could achieve our overall needs.

The fact that the technical support is out of China means that sometimes the engineers don't have a good command of the English language. That could hinder the overall experience. Apart from that, most of the incidents were resolved in 48 hours. Therefore, we're pretty satisfied with the level of service we've received.

I have previously worked with Informatica and TIBCO. I still believe Talent is superior. 

Obviously, being on AWS, we're using Linux AMI machines or vertical machines, using two machines. The setup was very easy. The only difficult part was to set up to the current time zone, however, this is nothing to do with Talend. We were having issues when Talend jobs were reporting the wrong date when they arrived because the set up was ETC rather than the local time zone.

Setting up Talend and setting up the administration console at the Tac server was very, very easy for somebody with a Linux System Administration skillset.

I set up the solution on my own.

I don't deal with corporate and pricing. I am just an IT Consultant. I honestly don't know the costs to run the solution. I don't know the price. I know people in the finance department are often complaining about the price, however, I don't know what the exact number is. 

It's all relative, after all. I have a very strong Oracle background and the Oracle price is totally outrageous. I don't believe that Talend prices are in the same ballpark as Oracle. I don't understand why people are complaining. That said, I don't deal with signing contracts and processes so I really don't know.

I am an IT Consultant. I use it currently in my job. I'm providing services to a company in Australia, using Talend.

I would advise others to use the Studio. If you have to pay for some license to use the key parallelize component, it's a good idea to do it. However, don't use the TAC. Use the other orchestration services like Control-M or AWS functions such as AWS Lambda. Don't use the TAC. The TAC is really ugly.

Overall, I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. I'd rate it higher, however, the TAC is unreliable. It's a big part of the solution, and, while I do really appreciate Talend Studio and the ability to link into a producer to make a Java code, which is ugly, I don't care because the job is done anyway. The fact that the orchestration is creating execution plans, from the TAC it's fine. However, when the running of the execution plan, sometimes there are issues. The job remains stuck on the actual server. I've had a lot of issues with TAC. 

My company uses Talend Open Studio to support ETL processes.

The most valuable feature of the solution is that it is an open-source tool. For all the components of the tool, you can work on the desktop version, and later on, once the component and ETL transformation are completed, we can move to the cloud. With other tools, trial versions are available only for one month. Talend makes available an open-source community version, which is helpful for ETL transformation.

Talend Open Studio is in Java language, and right now, you can only use the debug functionality in Java. I see that people who know programming languages other than Java currently face difficulties. The aforementioned area can be of concern where improvements can be considered to help non-Java users.

I have been using Talend Open Studio for a year. I use the solution's latest version. I work as a system integrator in my company.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Four people in my company, consisting of data engineers, data analysts, and data scientists, use the solution.

I haven't communicated with the solution's technical support since one can quickly grab any information from the product's documentation.

Informatica and Azure are some of the products I have used in the past. Based on clients' requirements, my company chose Talend Open Studio over Informatica.

The initial setup of the product was very easy.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

Based on the log file and how the transformation and aggregation work, within five three to five minutes, the transformation happens.

There is no maintenance required for the product in my company.

I recommend the product to those who plan to use it.

I rate the overall solution a seven out of ten.

I use Talend for different projects as I am studying business intelligence. 

I am using Talend for data integration and integrating Oracle and SQL Server, specifically using it for collecting data from Oracle and charging it to SQL Server.

The rapidity of integration with data may be one of the valuable features. Talend is easy to use due to its interface, which has helped in working with columns and data integration.

I faced a problem with the connection between Oracle and SQL Server due to a port issue.

I have been using it for two years.

Talend Open Studio is a scalable solution.

The initial setup is easy.

I am using the open-source version of the solution, so there are no extra costs for any feature.

Overall, I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I use Open Studio for the day-to-day management of our data architecture warehouse. 

Open Studio's best features are that it's user-friendly, even for beginners, and very easy to implement.

Open Studio's pipelines could be improved. It's also lagging behind as the market moves toward the cloud and needs to provide better serviceability. In the next release, Open Studio should include cloud storage as an input.

I've been using Open Studio for four to five years.

Open Studio's stability isn't great - it seems to need a patch every month and has a lot of security issues.

Talend's technical support isn't very good and not worth the money we spend on it.

Neutral

The initial setup is pretty easy.

Open Studio has a basic license and additional costs for services, including customer support and technical assistance.

I would recommend Open Studio for data operations, but potential customers should be aware of the lack of support and technical expertise Talend provides. I rate Open Studio as six out of ten.

The ease to use is great. You've got a lot of functionalities in there. The kind of connectors that you have within Talend is actually quite good. If you look at Talend, it has got more than 900 plus connectors that you can work with. You basically can work with a variety of data sources. There's no limit to it. That is one of the key benefits of Talend.

The initial setup is easy.

The solution is stable.

It's a scalable product.

Technical support is helpful.

It is user-friendly and the interface is good. 

The integration capabilities have been fine. 

Nothing comes to mind in terms of areas of improvement. 

Multiple products are there within the product suite. That can be actually trimmed down. Instead of having multiple products, what they can do is they can have a smaller set of products. That would be better.

You need a Java virtual machine, version 11. Anything below that is not going to work.

Technical support could answer queries a bit faster. 

I just installed the solution two or three weeks ago. 

The stability is very good. There are no bugs or glitches and it doesn't crash or freeze. The reliability is good.

It can scale as needed. That's not a problem.

We have four or five users using the solution in our company. They are developers. 

Technical support has been quite good. We are very happy with them so far.

Of course, they could always be more responsive.  

Positive

It's quite simple to set up. It's all about the installation. Just you need to click on the main file, and then it's just next, next, next. That's it. The one thing that you need to make sure of is that you have a JVM of version 11. It's just a standard installation. However, after that, the main thing that you need to make sure of is that you have a Java virtual machine, version 11. Anything below that will not work.

The pricing is reasonable. 

I'd rate the pricing on offer a five out of five. they make it very affordable. 

We also looked at Informatica. That is one of the leading platforms in the data integration space. Both solutions have got the same capabilities, however, the good thing about Talend is that is the cost. It's a bit cheaper.

The solution is deployed on my personal laptop.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

The solution can be deployed on the cloud and on-premise.

The most valuable features of Talend Open Studio are customization and integration.

Talend Open Studio has a lot of capabilities, but there is some restriction. For example, if we want to connect to an SAP system, Open Studio cannot do it. We need to go with an enterprise version. Additionally, the monitoring features could improve.

In the next release of the solution, there should be some sort of reporting. If you compare Open Studio with the enterprise version, the enterprise is giving us the usage reports, a lot of in-built reports are available. That feature is not available in the open-source, which can be increased. However, that's not a major show stopper or a concern, but it would be nice to have those features.

I have been using Talend Open Studio for approximately eight years.

Talend Open Studio is stable.

We did some testing with the enterprise version and we did not encounter any problems with the scalability of the solution. There are scalable features available. However, the documentation could be better.

Talend Open Studio needs to improve on its documentation and support.

The initial setup of Talend Open Studio was straightforward for Windows. However, when it comes to Linux, it is a bit complicated but it's manageable.

The implementation of Talend Open Studio was done in-house.

Talend Open Studio is priced too high.

The cost involved is high, we need to select which solution to use, the Open Studio version or the enterprise version. If there is scope for SAP or some paid connectors, we can go with the enterprise version, or the Open Studio version is capable enough to manage the data integration part.

I rate Talend Open Studio an eight out of ten.

We are a solution provider and Talend Open Studio is one of the products that we implement for our clients. I work as an integrator and a data flow developer.

The primary use case for Talend is data integration. It is typically used by engineers and managers.

This product is very easy to use.

The security features could be improved.

I have been working with Talend Open Studio for six years.

Talend Open Studio is a stable solution.

This product is scalable. We have five customers who are using it.

I have not been in contact with technical support.

The initial setup is straightforward. It takes two hours to deploy.

Talend Open Studio is a good product and I recommend it.

I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.

We were using the entire Talend solution for the last client, but it was only for integration between the databases and the data warehouse. It was a standard ETL job. We have Talend Open Studio deployed on our desktop, but we used the Talend cloud service for our clients.

Talend lets you do everything — mapping, workflow, and orchestration — in a single place. 

Talend should improve the log and error handling to better track the errors you find during development. Sometimes it's challenging to see what's causing an issue, and tracking that on Talend is complicated. 

I've been working with Talend for around two years. I'm no expert, but I have enough knowledge to create an entire solution using the tool.

Talend support is good. 

Since I'm only a developer, I didn't have much information about the installation.

The price is low. It's always good

I rate Talend Open Studion eight out of 10. Talend can do everything that you want to do, but to do the more complex tasks, you need extensive knowledge of IT processes. You need to know what you're doing or you won't' be able to do anything in Talend.