We use it to manage storage for our customers.
Our customers use it for mission-critical applications, such as backup circuits.
We use it to manage storage for our customers.
Our customers use it for mission-critical applications, such as backup circuits.
We use ONTAP as a managed storage for customers. It helps our customers with all its features.
There is a faster release cycle now. Also, they are doing all types of cool stuff in their cloud volumes, replication, and tiering.
The fabric pools in the newer version is cool, though we don't use it yet. It provides tiering to cloud and fabric pools.
It is very stable and never crashes. During maintenance, it's easy to do. If you lose connectivity, it has one-sided redundant connectivity on the back-end for shelves, which is good.
It doesn't scale horizontally since there are a limited number of shelves. Other NetApp solutions are way better at scaling. This needs improvement since the future is in scaling horizontally, similar to what SolidFire does.
NetApp's technical support is always perfect. They go above and beyond when trying to help.
We generally upgrade when a solution is end of life or moving out of support.
With older versions, it was a little complex at some point, but this was back in the day. It's still a bit challenging, but when you have the right versions, it's straightforward.
We're trying to automate the deployment process, and as far as I know, you cannot do that with ONTAP systems today. This may not be true with the newest 9.4 or 9.5 systems.
What makes it complicated, there is no API available to automate a task. Now, they have released a lot of Ansible playbooks to automate a deployment, which might have significantly improved it, but I have not had a chance to try them.
We did the deployment ourselves.
I would recommend ONTAP, because I like the platform. With the most recent stuff, like the fabric pools which blow my mind, it is a really good solution.
There is something interesting stuff coming out in the future, like NVMe over Fabric, which has a different rate over Fiber Channel.
It's our enterprise storage solution where we keep 95 percent of our data.
We use it for our mission-critical applications: All our SQL, Exchange, data warehousing, and anything with heaving I/O processing.
Our company has grown so fast, we spend more in the process. At the same time, we have been able to shrink due to technologies, such as deduplication and compression.
We've been able to keep up with the demands of our business in terms of both performance and storage. Whenever the business needs something, we add it right away. Whenever they say, "Hey, we're gonna throw some big load at you guys. Can you this handle it?" We say, "Yeah, the system can handle it."
It's more intuitive to use as they are moving away from command line into more graphical interfaces, which are somewhat easier to use.
There is room for improvement in the stability. They have been trying to become simpler, and as a result, there have been road bumps along the way. I have personally experienced this.
We have experience a number of bugs recently. The company has also gone through recent changes which has affected stability.
It scales pretty well. It has a cluster interface connection with multiple systems clustering across the board.
They are pretty good when it comes to critical support. Technical support is something they're still working on, but the critical support is good. The critical support will get back to you quickly and stay with you, so you always know who you are dealing with.
The performance was really bad on our previous solution. When we did an analysis with our tools, we saw how bad the storage performance was. It was a ten-year-old system. It was meant to run for a small company. It was never meant for where we were at the time.
Compared to what we had in the past, ONTAP has given us both visibility into performance, as well as, adapted to different changes. Where as before, we had a system that we couldn't do much with.
The initial setup was complex compared to what we had, since it does more. When we bought it a couple of years ago, it was more complex. Now, they are trying to become simpler at the setup.
The initial setup took a lot of steps. You had to know a lot of what had happened throughout the process. There were a lot of steps involved, where as now, they're condensing the amount of steps involved. Plus, its more graphically-driven now rather than being mostly command line.
We used two different consultants:
We picked the best out of both.
With the duplication and compression, we have been about a one and half to two times savings since we are not running all-flash.
It pays to get the Cadillac. That's what we call ours.
Don't undersize it. We undersized our first one and ended up having to get rid of it, then buying a new one. We lost money in the process. We should have paid for more than what we needed at the beginning.
NVMe over Fabric is considered the next generation of storage in terms of how fast things move.
Our company chose this solution because they've known it from the past.
We are still looking into machine learning, AI, and real-time analytics.
We are a storage provider for a government entity. We serve data to profilers and other government entities.
ONTAP allows us to scale and grow as needed and also be flexible in the way we operate.
The most valuable features are:
They should make the storage arrays more easily tied to your accounts.
It's very stable, and definitely become more stable over time. When Clustered Data ONTAP first came out, there were quite a few bugs. However, with the latest releases, we have been pretty happy.
Scalability is good. We're happy with it.
It should be easier to put in tech support cases. For example, sometimes you have to call in for a bad disk. You have to stay on the phone for 20 minutes to speak to a person just to get a new disk. They should streamline the online support and chat.
Most people wouldn't have this problem, but we have multiple site numbers we have to deal with. A lot of times it's just easier to go through the 20-minute conversation than trying to find for them the specific storage problem.
Over time, systems age and the amount of FAS that you could fit into a rack three years ago was a lot different than what you can now. We needed to find something flexible which allows us to customize solutions as we go.
NetApp is typically more complex than normal storage systems. I like it though. There's a lot more granularity and you can configure it the way you want it.
We used Professional Services, and we do it on our own as well. So far, our experience with Professional Services has been great. We're still in the process. They give us guidance. We have our own way that we like to deploy, but it's nice to have their input and information. Just having them there to be able to bounce an idea off of is helpful.
We have seen ROI as we can fit a lot more storage in one rack.
We use multiple different vendors for different scenarios.
I'm pretty happy with ONTAP.
We use it for storing unstructured data.
It is able to store a lot of data, and we can manage it with fewer people.
Generally, their products are good when they come out of the gate. However, what would be good is when we uncover new issues, if those could be addressed quickly.
We would like to see SnapMirror encryption in the next release and have better access to feature development.
It is generally very stable.
Technical support has gone down in my perspective. When getting to the root cause of issues, they need to respond faster. Also, they need to respond quicker to bug fixes.
There have been some changes internally at NetApp. Currently, we are moving to a different level of support which will hopefully fix our issues with it.
We use NetApp products. If we switch products, it is because the product does not perform or is not keeping up with its competitors in terms of cost.
We did the deployment ourselves. Deployments are easy, but NetApp could make it easier.
Return on investment has been good.
There are specific workloads where some vendors provide better value, but in general, NetApp has done a far better on price than other vendors.
We have used Hitachi and Dell EMC, but we use NetApp the most.
It is a good, market-leading product.
I work for an oil and gas company. We go out to the field and get oil from the ground. The primary use case is for development and preparation for production.
We're able to gather information, and put it all together to find out where the best place to drill would be. Also, speed. Our databases work a lot faster, probably 18 or 20 percent faster than previously. The speed has increased the performance.
My colleagues get their information files without bringing down SQL.
It's very fast, NetApp is always dependable, so if we have an issue, they're very responsive.
The new release has a lot of features that will save us space and therefore, money. The inline deduplication and compression are really nice.
They could lower prices so my management doesn't complain about cost. Other than that, I'm always happy with the releases.
It's 100 percent. We've never had any issues with it.
It's 100 percent. It's easy to add additional storage disks.
I would rate tech support at nine-plus out of ten. It's not a ten because I have to wait when I call. I can wait for 20, 30 minutes before I get to somebody who can actually help me. Normally NetApp identifies the issue before I get out of bed and has a solution already planned.
We were coming to end-of-life with our old solution, and this was the next generation that was available, so we would have upgraded regardless. This was the best option.
It was straightforward. It's built on previous NetApp operating systems. I understood it without knowing the new generation.
We used NetApp Professional Services, and it was very good. I worked with them beforehand and gave them my plan. Any corrections were made beforehand. We've done it twice and it's been very good.
I know they have saved time, and time equals money. We also have more space in the data center. It's a smaller footprint by half a rack. That's a lot less money and a lot less cooling.
We looked at Dell EMC, but we would never go with them. They don't have good support and it's gotten worse over the years since Dell and EMC merged. Instead of two bad support systems, they have now combined it into one huge, bad support system. NetApp's technical support and proven stability are a lot better than them. We've been using NetApp for around 15 years and we've always had good results with it.
It's an advance from what we used before, and a lot faster. It doesn't take a lot of learning to start using it.
Take a look at NetApp and get the Professional Services involved. If you're coming from a different vendor, they'll be able to assist with getting the data moved over. That would be my main point.
We are a NetApp distributor. We offer assistance for banking solutions, energy companies, and companies that do retail.
We distribute Netapp as well as a variety of other products, like VMware, for example. We use all our products to provide our customers with a whole solution.
Efficiency. We have found that its efficiency has reduced the amount of storage that the customers need, while keeping the same amount of data.
They constantly develop new features that provide the customers with ways they can better use the system.
Deployment guides. If the customer wants to integrate with another product they need deployment guides.
It has almost 100% stability.
The solution is very scalable. We have found that the ability to add other nodes to the online cluster during production has been really useful for customers.
NetApp has very good technical support across all of their products. They have many ways to contact support and you receive support almost instantly.
The customers like the support as well. The customer has on-site support with a four-hour response. They always have support as they need it.
The initial setup is straightforward. It's easy to deploy.
I'm a presales engineer. The way that I help customers is by architecting their infrastructure which helps them to decide which is the best solution for them. I also help plan the future of their infrastructure, the way they're going to be expanding the systems or the way they're going to renew their systems.
With the efficiencies of NetApp, the customer is going to be able to reduce the amount of storage they need. This is the way that the customer assesses the amount of money they invest in the solution.
I think because of the integration with the other products we sell, like VMware, for example, that's why they have us use NetApp as a storage solution. We sell a lot of security products that have integration with NetApp and we also have integration with Microsoft and VMware which have integration with NetApp.
It's an excellent product. They always have new solutions for their customers. They also have good integration with other partners like Microsoft, VMware, and Oracle.
Compared with their competitors, NetApp has a good advantage with their new development and new functionalities. The new platforms are competitive with other storage solutions. NetApp has better integration with all their solutions. They have only one interface for all their products as well as the same operating system. It's really easy for the customer to handle and to administer the solution.
It is the easiest way to backup, restore data, and access data along with keep it secure. It has an easy interface to manage all the data.
It has made it easy to deal with the scalability in our organization along with the mass increase of data. We avoid loss of important data and can recover it completely. NetApp has made this challenge for us easy.
I would like more security against the malwares, spyware, and ransomware. I feel like ONTAP is a bit lacking in this area.
It is very stable. You can trust NetApp almost 100% that it will work fine. The disks are stable and our data is safe with NetApp.
If we want to change things in models, such as add, replace, and adjust to another client, it is very easy. This is a good thing.
They have very good tech support who always answers our questions and troubleshoots our issues. They're great. It is easy to escalate, and they have friendly people. They will help you all the time, every hour in a day.
NetApp was our first storage solution.
The initial setup was straightforward.
We used Encore Technology Group. Our experience was not very good as they lost data, which was a critical mistake for us. They also did not respond in time.
Because of the dedupe technologies and Data ONTAP servers, we have saved 20% on hardware. This is a lot of money for us.
While it is going to cost a lot of money, their technologies is worth it.
We also considered HPE and IBM, but NetApp was the cheapest, friendliest, and most accessible.
It is friendly to use and manage. They are very good in backup and restoring 100% of things up to the minute. It's very easy for regular users.
We are using it for the cloud and storage: NAS and SAN.
If they could come up with some more automation, this would be helpful.
I have never had an outage.
Scalability is good. You can expand the storage with disks, which is good.
I haven't had to contact technical support, but their support is 24/7 if I needed it.
We were previously using NetApp MetroClusters. We have tested in the lab, NetApp MetroClusters, and have run into issues. I have come up with tie breakers, which are like witnesses our virtual storage arrays. One storage fails and another storage array will be active all the time. In this case, if a tie breaker is down, NetApp doesn't know how to deal with the data. It gets confused. NetApp should come up with a solution for this, such as a physical witness.
It's very easy. It's not complex.
We used NetApp for the deployment. They know how to deal with issues and follow best practices. It's always better to have them install the storage.
With other vendors, we need to buy a separate license for a third-party storage, but with NetApp, you don't need to buy a license, as it will come up with the storage.
I can recommend NetApp. If you need a solution, use NetApp.