I have about 500 volumes that I manage, and I love it.
Systems Architect at University of San Diego
It is very reliable. We have not lost one byte of data.
Pros and Cons
- "My experience with NetApp is its very easy to learn and intuitive. I can figure out just about everything."
- "I wish tech support would be better. I wish I could talk to somebody more easily and qualified, because this is way it is supposed to be.."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
It's a good thing to have a reliable storage. Our whole business relies on it. Our two main mission-critical systems, which are EBS system (Oracle Financials) and Banner, which is our database for student services, are stored on NetApp. We need it to be reliable, efficient, and quick, which it is.
They run on AIX and are stored on ONTAP.
What is most valuable?
My experience with NetApp is its very easy to learn and intuitive. I can figure out just about everything.
I love the System Manager. I don't even need to remember commands. I love its ease of use.
What needs improvement?
I wish tech support would be better. I wish I could talk to somebody more easily and qualified, because this is way it is supposed to be. At the moment, you talk to an entry level people, and sometimes they know less than you. You waste two to three hours with them. Finally, they send you to a higher level person who knows something. This is something many companies need to improve.
Buyer's Guide
NetApp ONTAP
September 2025

Learn what your peers think about NetApp ONTAP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very reliable. We have not lost one byte of data. There was even an occasion about three months ago where one of my nodes went down. It was recovered and nobody even noticed.
I don't worry about stability. Even when a disc goes bad, I know it will replace itself. NetApp will send me an email, “We'll send you this tomorrow.”
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is very good. Now that we have an AFF A300, it will be even better. You can add more to storage on live. Before, when we had the 3220s, you only had two nodes, so you had to buy another two nodes to scale.
How are customer service and support?
Sometimes, tech support is slow to answer. However, I'm seeing this as a trend in all companies, even IBM.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I've been using ONTAP for about ten years. I started with the 3140s, then went to the 3240s, and now, I just upgraded to the AFF A300.
How was the initial setup?
I went from an 8.17 node to 9.3 cluster nodes. This was a big change. I still have a lot of things to learn. For example, the migration was done using the 7-Mode migration tool, which was tough.
What about the implementation team?
We used a reseller for NetApp for the deployment. They were good.
What was our ROI?
I have been able to save space using ONTAP, particularly now on the new system. By default, you get compression, deduping, etc. We have saved at least 20 percent in terms of space.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We received a super deal for our new machine, so we were happy with the price.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I did not consider anyone else. I love NetApp.
There are some new companies out there, but you take a chance on them. With mission-critical systems, you need a stable company. You cannot play around. NetApp systems will work when things go wrong.
What other advice do I have?
My experience with ONTAP has been very good. It is very reliable.
I might use ONTAP for machine learning. AI. and real-time analytics in the future. Next year will be very interesting as we upgraded to an AFF A300, so that's a new ballgame. I wouldn't mind getting into the cloud.
I am not using NVMe yet. Maybe next year, I will venture into that. I am only using Fibre Channel and iSCSI right now.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Storage Architect at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees
Scalability is awesome with a cluster node, not only can you scale up, but you can also scale out
Pros and Cons
- "It has multiple uses. It does everything in one box."
- "Scalability is awesome with a cluster node, not only can you scale up, but you can also scale out."
- "While the data efficiency features are great, I want to see more efficiency and compression type of technology."
What is our primary use case?
We use it for everything, like the NAS and SAN functionality. It's a back-end for the host VMs and the Microsoft SQL Database, which is directly attached to them. We also use all-in-one file servers.
How has it helped my organization?
We got rid of about 25 Windows file servers, which is great. We don't have to patch them every month anymore. We now have an all in one solution, which are virtual storage machines (SVMs). For example, previously, executives would try to use presentation material on the file server and the screen would not come up for a long time. Now it come up instantly.
We use it for our mission-critical applications, such as SQL Databases and NetApp AFF.
What is most valuable?
It has multiple uses. It does everything in one box.
What needs improvement?
I would like them to support NetApp All Flash in upcoming NVMe versions. We have an AFF8040 and NVMe version 9.4 does not currently support it.
I would like to have an easier connection to the cloud on the back-end. Something that brings the cold data out to the cloud and brings it back when needed. We want ONTAP to do this.
While the data efficiency features are great, I want to see more efficiency and compression type of technology.
For how long have I used the solution?
More than five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It works. It is great and reliable. We haven't had any issues. Hardware failure is rare. We have no performance issues with our AFF.
When a disk failed, it was automatically detected. They sent me a disk and I wasn't even aware of it. It happened on Sunday and they sent me a disk on Monday morning.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is awesome with a cluster node, not only can you scale up, but you can also scale out.
How are customer service and technical support?
ONTAP tech support needs some improvement, but it has improved quite a bit.
Previously, the support center was in India and Asia. They had some communication problems but their technical skills were not up to par. Then, they pulled the technical support back into North Carolina, as this helped a lot. I can talk to a Level 1, which most of the time I don't need. When I have an issue, I know exactly what I'm talking about. I know there's a bug and need to go to Level 2. Also, our large corporation global team gets involved as soon as I open a case, and they put me through to Level 2 or Level 3, which helps a lot.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We were previously using Hitachi with NetApp. However, Hitachi is lacking in all the features. Our companies chose Hitachi because it was cheaper, but this was back in the early 2000s. Hitachi doesn't have any NAS functionality. File systems could not be migrated unless we connected to a Windows system, then Windows provided the file system function.
We looked into this solution because of its high availability and disaster recovery. We are in a dangerous business because something could blow up and everything would be lost. So, offsite backup replication, SnapMirror, and SnapVault are very important.
How was the initial setup?
It was extremely easy to set up from day one.
What about the implementation team?
I implemented everything myself.
What was our ROI?
It has helped us reduce the overall cost of storage. Replacing the Windows license alone provided us savings.
We have been able to save a lot of space because there is deduplication and compression.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Just buy ONTAP and go for it.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
When we were considered products, we also looked at Dell EMC. Previously, Dell EMC products only provided SAN functionality. We had to buy separate Celerra as NAS heads to attach to the SAN back-end.
NetApp has much smarter way of doing everything. Their Snapshot technology, by just copying the index, is much better than Dell EMC, which forces you to cut a snapshot, taking up I/O.
Data Domain has a lot better deduplication technology than NetApp, and that is bad for NetApp.
What other advice do I have?
We have been using Fibre Channel, but we are planning on moving over to NVMe. We're on a 32G Gen 6 switches and HBA cards. We need to convert it to see how it will affect the speed, but it should drastically increase the performance of the connection.
NVMe over Fabric with existing Fibre Channel infrastructure is wonderful. It is easy to convert. We don't have to do much at all. It's just a matter of how we present. Instead of using WWPNs, we use an IQN number. So, it's connecting the same volume over iSCSI and Fibre Channel mixed. We just have another means to talk to the hosts.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Buyer's Guide
NetApp ONTAP
September 2025

Learn what your peers think about NetApp ONTAP. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: September 2025.
870,697 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Storage and Backup Manager at Vodafone
The cluster version is flexible and easy to use
Pros and Cons
- "The cluster version is flexible and easy to use."
- "Stability and performance have been great."
- "In Africa, especially in West Africa, NetApp doesn't chat with their customers. Therefore, we always have to go through the local partners or vendors."
- "Because most of us were new to the product, the initial setup was a bit cumbersome. Once we were trained, it was fine."
- "I would like it to be more user-friendly. When you open the main dashboard, anyone should be able to know exactly what is going on, even without a tech background. Minimal training should be required."
What is our primary use case?
ONTAP is the OS for NetApp storage controllers. We use it to provision storage or line volumes for our internal customers requesting storage either for databases, the storing of flat files, etc.
How has it helped my organization?
ONTAP 7-mode is a bit archaic, but with the clustered mode, it is straightforward. Also, if you add OnCommand Unified Manager, it is awesome.
We have a lot of mission critical systems, so we normally use ONTAP for all of them along with our databases and applications, e.g., Oracle Databases, like the BI and the CRM. We also have a VMS, which takes care of our virtual management systems.
It's easy to use. So, we don't have much stress.
What is most valuable?
- SnapMirror
- Snapshot
- FlexClone volume: Cloning of volumes, volume move, and volume create.
What needs improvement?
I would like it to be more user-friendly. When you open the main dashboard, anyone should be able to know exactly what is going on, even without a tech background. Minimal training should be required.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability and performance have been great.
Sometimes it takes a while for us to upgrade. We need to ensure the applications running are compatible with the upgrades that we will be running. So, it takes us a little time to upgrade. However, all the upgrades, including the latest one (ONTAP 9.4), have been awesome.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Its scalability is good.
How are customer service and technical support?
I'm here at NetApp Insight because I needed to talk to a few of the NetApp customer representatives about cost. In Africa, especially in West Africa, NetApp doesn't chat with their customers. Therefore, we always have to go through the local partners or vendors.
I just spoke to a woman on the technology team. She's promised to be in touch and have somebody come to Ghana to speak to the high-end customers, like Vodafone, MTN, etc.
ONTAP's technical support is awesome and always ready to help.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not have a solution before NetApp, and NetApp was the first, but now we have Huawei as well.
We first used the NetApp 7-Mode version. Now, we use the cluster version. The cluster version is more flexible and easier to use.
How was the initial setup?
Because most of us were new to the product, the initial setup was a bit cumbersome. Once we were trained, it was fine.
What about the implementation team?
We used a local vendor for the deployment with professional support from Nigeria. Our experience with them was good.
What was our ROI?
We have seen ROI.
It doesn't help reduce the overall cost of storage.
We have been able to save about 3TB to 5TB of storage. We still need to do more on the compression bit, then provisioning, to save more going forward.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The product costs an arm and leg; it's expensive.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We looked at NetApp, Dell EMC, HPE, and Huawei.
We chose NetApp because of efficiency and performance. Its product is up-to-date.
What other advice do I have?
Fabric is good. I have yet to experience NVMe.
Sometime in the future, we will look at AI and machine learning.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Server and Storage consultant at a media company with 1,001-5,000 employees
A very user-friendly and stable tool that provides features like deduplication and data protection to its users
Pros and Cons
- "Deduplication, data protection, and NetApp block are some of the valuable features of the product."
- "The GUI of NetApp ONTAP is an area with certain shortcomings that need to be considered for improvement."
What is most valuable?
Deduplication, data protection, and NetApp block are some of the valuable features of the product.
What needs improvement?
The GUI of NetApp ONTAP is an area with certain shortcomings that need to be considered for improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using NetApp ONTAP for over three years. I am using the solution's latest version.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
My company has a dozen users of NetApp ONTAP.
How are customer service and support?
I rate NetApp ONTAP's support a ten out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
I rate my experience with NetApp ONTAP's setup phase a ten out of ten.
The product is deployed on-premises.
The deployment process took a day to two to be completed.
Two people look into the software part during the deployment process of the product.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I rate NetApp ONTAP's pricing a seven out of ten.
What other advice do I have?
In NetApp ONTAP, both the hardware and the software are the same. The only thing with NetApp ONTAP is that you can't buy it separately because it comes with the box, which is its hardware.
I definitely recommend the solution to those planning to use it. It's a very friendly and usable tool with lots of features, majorly storage.
Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Regional Sales Manager at a tech consulting company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Great features with good expansion capabilities and good reliability
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is pretty straightforward."
- "The price could be lower."
What is our primary use case?
One of the classic use cases is the high availability for both block and file. However, many different technologies within NetApp are of interest to our customers.
What is most valuable?
NetApp has a variety of different features and technologies on offer.
The initial setup is pretty straightforward.
It's a stable product.
The solution can scale well.
What needs improvement?
The integration with other products, both security and third-party products such as Lenovo and others doing OEM solutions, that would be ideal. We'd like to have these with ONTAP on top. We'd like integrations with different types of backup solutions and so on.
The price could be lower.
We have a good sense of feature sets in the pipeline for the product and therefore are largely satisfied with both its capabilities and the roadmap.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for five years or so.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability is great. I'd rate it ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The product scales very well. I'd rate it nine or ten out of ten. It expands easily.
The solution works well for large or mid-size companies.
Within our company, none of us is using NetApp storage as we are providing our customers with solutions.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
From our portfolio, we're selling a lot of Dell EMC and NetApp. We're selling Huawei, and we're selling other storage space as well, such as some IBM. With that said, if you compare Dell EMC and NetApp, it's mostly based on the integration, technologies, and flexibility where we see NetApp being a better fit for many of our customers, yet not for all.
How was the initial setup?
We have been working with NetApp a lot. Doing implementations is not a problem for us.
What about the implementation team?
95% of the time, clients can handle the initial setup. However, we primarily work with enterprise accounts, and those, even with a simple setup, can often lead to complex requirements.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing is okay. I'd rate it three out of five in terms of affordability. It is not a cheap solution. However, it is quite stable and offers good value.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did evaluate this solution against other options.
What other advice do I have?
I'm actually a partner of Lenovo and NetApp. We're integrators. We set the solution up for our clients.
I'd rate the solution ten out of ten.
Based on my 20 years within the IT industry, NetApp is the best system out there. It is just not the cheapest. That said, looking at what it can do with Lenovo and other vendors make it a good option.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Reseller
Data Center Administrator at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
A reliable solution with professional storage capabilities
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is certainly reliable."
- "It would be nice if they make it so that one can operate the console without the need for interface-related comments."
What is our primary use case?
We use NetApp ONTAP for many services concerned with banking solutions.
What is most valuable?
The application and the application technology is really helpful to us. We find its use to be really good.
What needs improvement?
The licensing prices are really high.
It would be nice if they make it so that one can operate the console without the need for interface-related comments.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using NetApp ONTAP for around three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is certainly reliable. In the two or three years that we have worked with it we have not encountered any problems.
How are customer service and support?
As we are based in Iran, where there are many issues, such as sanctions, NetApp tech support has not been an option for us.
What about the implementation team?
We handled the initial setup on our own.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I feel the licensing prices to be very much on the high side. I do not know how frequently these licenses must be renewed.
What other advice do I have?
In the three years that we have been using the solution, we have not encountered any problems with it and found it to work really well.
As I have had experience working with EMC, PROMISE and HP, I would definitely recommend the solution to others. I find the solution to be really reliable and strong. Its storage device capabilities are very professional.
I rate NetApp ONTAP as an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
Virtual Private Cloud Architect at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
Scales well with good performance and good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "The performance of the hardware is good."
- "The setup can be a bit complex, depending on the environment."
What is our primary use case?
We basically use NetApp Storage as mass storage within our offering. We also use it for backup storage, storage for emails, and sometimes for archiving. Mostly it is actually general-purpose file storage.
What is most valuable?
The solution has very good Snapshot features. Everybody goes to NetApp for Snapshot. Their Snapshots are very good. We use it for local backups. We also have a DR set up. We use Snapshot or SnapMirror for the DR applications. We also use Snapshot for backup purposes as well. Snapshot is the one thing I would say is actually the most useful feature for us.
NetApp is very stable.
They have all the latest features.
Their support is good.
The performance of the hardware is good.
What needs improvement?
We're actually looking at a software-defined version of NetApp. They already have a software-defined product called ONTAP Select. NetApp's ONTAP version for the cloud is called the Cloud Volumes ONTAP. We are looking for the Cloud Volumes ONTAP, an on-premises option. Right now, the only option we have is the cloud and that's only available with AWS and Google. We already had some discussions with NetApp about it. It usually takes two or three months and a lot of money on a software-defined solution. If we gain access to it, we can run it on a virtual machine and it will still give all the features without having to buy their hardware.
The pricing could be lower.
The setup can be a bit complex, depending on the environment.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using the product for a long time. I would say we've used it in total for 10 or so years, however, in different offerings. The names have changed and the company also changed quite a bit.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I've been working with the solution for ten years, and I've rarely had any issues. I consider the product to be extremely stable. There aren't bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution can scale very, very easily.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is good. I don't have any issues with them. Most of my interactions are very, very good except for maybe one or two cases over the course of ten or so years. Mostly I find it very useful. They are very responsive and knowledgeable.
How was the initial setup?
The setup up is a bit complex within our environment. We actually tweak it to our requirements. The integration for backup purposes, for example, we use NetBackup. However, then the solution that we have is a bit complex for backups, especially if we want to actually do a Snapshot version only. We actually take full backups every day. Our solution is actually a bit tweaked for our real requirement. I would say it is actually not very complex. That said, it is not very easy either. It is somewhere in between. There is some level of complexity in our solution.
To apply and maintain the product you need a team, definitely. To deploy it, it depends on how you set up your environment. In our environment, one person can deploy it because we have most of the tasks automated. For us, it is not very difficult to deploy. however, then you also need the dependency. For example, to build a network, you are required to connect the device to the network, and then to set up the backup. You need a team as it requires some integration with the network, with the backup, and whatnot. There are many, many things to do.
In our environment, we only need two people. That is due to the level of automation we have. To operate it, you also need a team. How big the team is depending on the service level. You may have to have people in shifts. In our team, we have many people. It's a global offering at this stage. So we have a presence everywhere. That requires a huge team. There are maybe 10 plus members supporting it around the clock.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost is quite high. They need to work on making it a bit more affordable. We buy the equipment as a one-time purchase and then also purchase five years of support. It's a CapEx model.
What other advice do I have?
We are service providers. We are offering something called a virtual private cloud. Our offering mainly the virtual private cloud. It is a cloud offering by DXC.
The product is basically a multi-tenant cloud. The cloud is hosted on our premises. We have data centers across the globe. Around 24 data centers in different regions. It's a global offering. We automated it and we have it set up for provisioning or portal enabled. It is not as good as Amazon or AWS, however, it is still a lot of cloud.
You can request a portal, however, then you cannot scale to that scale that Amazon currently is. That said, there are some customization possibilities. It is slightly cheaper than the hyperscaler cloud and that is why most customers prefer it. They find it really useful and cheaper than a public cloud offering, and it still has the same performance level.
I would recommend the product. I don't see any reason why you would have to look for a different vendor. The one thing that they can improve is the cost. That's pretty high. That is the only concern. Otherwise, they are very, very good in all other areas. Their hardware, software, their support, etc., are all good.
I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. We've been very happy with the product overall.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. Partner
Storage Manager at mEKOROT
Stable, easy to deploy and just works
Pros and Cons
- "The product is stable, easy to deploy and it just works."
- "We had a few small issues with setup, but once everything was done it just worked."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for Hyper-V, VMware, SQL, Enterprise Vault, and Commvault.
How has it helped my organization?
This product has improved the way our organization functions because everything is working so well and we don't have any disasters. Everything is perfect. Our SLA (Service Level Agreement) is in RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective). Everything just perfect.
What needs improvement?
What I would like to see in the next release is the ability to combine all the clusters. Make it so that they will work not just pairs. If I have a four-node cluster, I want it to work for four and not just four pairs of clusters. This is what I am expecting as an enhancement.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
My impression of the stability of the solution is very high. We don't have any problems.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I think the scalability of this solution is excellent.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is amazing. Amazing-plus. Technical support always answers. Whenever I need them, they are there. I don't have to wait or waste my time to get the answer by email. I just call them and they answer, and they immediately try to help us. So, if there is a 1 to 10, the technical support is an 11.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We switched to this solution because we always believed that NetApp is the best company for storage solutions. I don't think they have a real competitor because they have the perfect solution that is what the end-user really needs. Everything from the software to the hardware is very good. Other competitors have similar solutions, but not the same solution or quality. They have the hardware, they have the technology, they have a protocol, but not all the protocols. NetApp actually thinks about what the user really needs to dive in deep. They know why, how to make the customer satisfied.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was straightforward. The technical guys came and deployed all of our operating systems. It was easy and maybe sometimes, not always, there was some small issue but in the end, everything is working very well.
What about the implementation team?
We did not use outside help. We did the deployment ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost of licensing for our company is really not that much. We are a big company but we only use Fibre Channel SAN (Storage Area Network) storage. We don't use the others. So actually we did not need to use all of the licenses. So, the cost is really average for us.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Other competitor solutions that we were thinking about was mostly Nimble Storage. But it is not like NetApp.
What other advice do I have?
We use the InLine Encryption solution for SnapMirror, SnapManager, SnapCenter, SnapMirror data protections, SnapVault, and that's all.
The Snapshot copies and Bin Clones solutions affected our application development speed because we run all this at the nights so we actually don't have any effects on performance. Even if we do it in the middle of the day, the users don't feel any latency. So everything is going well.
This solution has helped to reduce our organization's data footprint and reduced our organization's cloud costs by up to 100 K.
On a scale of one to ten where one is the worst and ten is the best, I would rate this product as a ten. There is no competitor like NetApp. You cannot compete with them because we have what we need and what we want and we are so satisfied that we are sure NetApp is the best solution for us.
The advice I would give to someone considering this solution is first to ask him what exactly the solution is that they are searching for. If I can see that they are using or considering a different solution that they think is like my solution, I prefer to invite them to come to our company and see how NetApp works. I would show them how the solution works and how it runs without any problems. If they want they can get full protection — the full self-confidence we call it. It is confidence that you are actually choosing the right tool and not just the vendor. They need to know the product is actually working.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free NetApp ONTAP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: September 2025
Product Categories
Storage SoftwarePopular Comparisons
DataCore SANsymphony
Dell PowerPath
StorONE Storage-as-a-Service
Buyer's Guide
Download our free NetApp ONTAP Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?
- When evaluating Storage Software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- DataCore vs. Nexenta vs. Tintri - which should we choose for our exclusively Citrix shop?
- What are the main storage requirements to support Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning applications?
- Why is Storage Software important for companies?