MongoDB Reviews

• Reliability
• Enterprise integration
• Documentation
• Certification
• Support

It allows us to have an alternative solution to licensed DB's.

It requires enterprise integration improvements from the security, and audit perspective (AD integration etc.). Also, existing integration into BI tools is not present.

I've used it for five years.

MongoDB has a "heavy" architecture, which limits the scalability options.

They provide a high level of technical support.

We switched due to a common OS integration strategy.

We had an RFP process to evaluate between similar product categories.

We primarily use the solution for web applications.

In our company we decided to invest in the knowledge of an alternative technology to SQL. MongoDB seemed like an obvious choice together with other leading technologies.Furthermore, it is a product that can be intuitive to use unless you come from years of SQL

It has quite good web analytics. It is pretty stable. There is more in-depth management of the data.

It's a NoSQL/Document DB and has some peculiarity related to the data schema but it's also good as a general-purpose DB.

The replication works very well and is in the box. 

In clusters, there is the choice to have horizontal scaling, which improves performance on a huge amount of data.

The aggregation framework is very powerful when elaborating on data. 

It has good high availability.

It's an essential DB. 

It has very good performance for queries.

It is free to use if you choose the community version.

It is stable and reliable.

You can easily scale the solution.

It's quite a good DB that is very strong on a lot of features. 

It is a product that works very well. I don't see a lot of areas that need improvement. 

I've used the solution for five to six years. I've used it for a while now. 

I'd rate the stability nine or ten out of ten. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze.

I'd rate the scalability nine or ten out of ten. It allows for horizontal scaling, which is quite useful when dealing with big data.

We have about ten people using the solution at this time. One-third of the company ends up using the solution.

We may increase usage. It depends on the business needs. However, in Italy, I have noted MongoDB is expanding.

The technical support is very good but is available only for the enterprise version. 

When I've used other DBs I found them to be inferior.

We have used also Atlas (MongoDB solution for Cloud), and MongoDB has developed a useful framework with lots of new features that are not included in MongoDB's on-premise version. If you choose a cloud DB, it's great if you are looking for a lot of innovative features. 

Many clients use SQL DBs and many are moving over to MongoDB.

The initial setup was pretty straightforward to set up. Compared to other SQL DBs, SQL databases are very complex. MongoDB is ready to go, and you need less operational knowledge. 

I do not invest in MongoDB. However, many customers can save money by leveraging the MongoDB community version. 

The community version is free. The enterprise version is reasonable as MongoDB wants to expand and outpace also SQL DBs. 

I am not using the latest version of the solution. 

Do not think of this solution as a SQL database. Consider your use case and set it up accordingly.

I'd rate the solution ten out of ten. It's the best database on the market.

I have used the product to store and manage data operations.

MongoDB is simpler to learn and implement than traditional SQL solutions like MySQL.

The product's data consistency could be more efficient than traditional SQLs.

I have used MongoDB for a year while working on a project. I was using the latest version.

MongoDB was stable and much faster than traditional SQL.

There were five MongoDB users in our organization working in different teams.

I was working with MySQL before. I decided to use MongoDB rather than other products to learn something new. It is easier to learn and implement than other databases.

The learning process for initial setup is easier compared to traditional SQL. Someone without prior experience working with it can learn the process quickly.

MongoDB is an open-source product. We don't have to pay for the licenses.

I advise others to evaluate a lot of other databases. MongoDB worked fine for my project. However, I would have selected a product besides MongoDB to improve my skills and learn something new.

I rate it a six out of ten.

I use the solution with an application. 

The solution should have better integration. 

I have been working with MongoDB for a couple of years.

The solution is stable. 

We do not have plans to increase the usage at present. 

We have not made use of technical support. 

The installation is very easy to do and understand. I found it to be simple. 

We have an engineer who is responsible for the deployment. 

The solution is open source, so it is free. There is no licensing fee. 

The solution is faster than that of the competition's. 

I developed an application using the solution. 

We made many improvements to the solution. 

I do not have the requisite experience to properly comment on the solution's security and stability. 

There are around 200-plus users making use of the solution in my organization. 

We are talking about a rapid activity and replication solution which serves our needs well. I recommended it at the time. 

I rate MongoDB as an eight out of ten.

I'm a developer use it for developing. We develop with it. We use it as a service.

We use it in a Docker container.

I'm a developer, so I use it only in development. I'm not an IT professional or upper level guy. It is really a pretty easy product to use. It's very reliable, it's proven. 

In terms of what could be improved, that's a difficult question actually, because we're really very happy with it.

As for what could be included in the next release, I'd like to see an ID generator. It's very technical but I don't think it has one, so we have to go to great lengths to work around that.

I have been using MongoDB for about half a year.

In terms of scalability, all I can say is that in the organization, everybody uses it.

We're not using support.

The initial setup is very straightforward.

There's no license cost, it's open source.

Depending on your project, I would recommend MongoDB.

On a scale of one to ten, because it's free, I'd give MongoDB a 10.

We have a lot of mobile apps, and the data of all the mobile users are stored in this database.

MongoDB was very easy to install and maintain. We have managed a lot of mobile apps and hosted them in this environment.

I like its performance and the stability. It's very stable and, performance-wise, it's really great.

They could improve the UI and the analytics part.

I have been dealing with MongoDB for more than seven years.

MongoDB is very stable.

There are a lot of options to make it scalable.

The initial setup is very easy.

It's open-source.

I would tell potential users to just try it out. I would recommend this solution to new users.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give MongoDB an eight. 

We use it for website designing, and for mobile app designing just like Adobe XD. This is back-end technology that helps in integrating the front end with the back-end systems.

I value the API integrations.

I would like to see the scalability and security improved.

I have been using MongoDB for the past two years.

MongoDB is a stable solution.

It is complex and you need some expertise to deploy it.

We did our deployment in-house.

MongoDB has an open-source model.

I would rate MongoDB a nine out of ten.