We performed a comparison between webMethods.io API and webMethods.io Integration based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is good."
"Clients choose webMethods.io API for its intuitive interface, promoting seamless interaction and quick communication between systems."
"I like the tool's scalability."
"The connectivity that the tool provides, along with the functionalities needed for our company's business, are some of the beneficial aspects of the product."
"The solution is scalable."
"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."
"It's easy to construct new interfaces like apps and client portals."
"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."
"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."
"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."
"A potential drawback of webMethods.io API is its adaptability to legacy systems, which can vary in compatibility."
"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."
"Rules engine processes and BPM processes should be improved."
"The solution's release management feature could be better."
"It is difficult to maintain."
"The products, at the moment, are new and there should perhaps be support for the older version of the protocols."
"I am not satisfied with the solution because it takes too much effort to migrate and add new information. The migration could be easier."
webMethods.io API is ranked 30th in API Management with 2 reviews while webMethods.io Integration is ranked 29th in API Management with 7 reviews. webMethods.io API is rated 8.0, while webMethods.io Integration is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of webMethods.io API writes "Offers a strategic toolset for gradual integration advancement". On the other hand, the top reviewer of webMethods.io Integration writes "Though the tool provides great connectivity functionality, it needs to be made more stable". webMethods.io API is most compared with Apigee and MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager, whereas webMethods.io Integration is most compared with webMethods Integration Server, SAP Cloud Platform, Apigee, Microsoft Azure API Management and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps. See our webMethods.io API vs. webMethods.io Integration report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
