We performed a comparison between webMethods Integration Server and WebRatio based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, MuleSoft, Software AG and others in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."Currently, we're using this solution for the integration server which helps us to integrate with the mainframe."
"What I found most valuable in webMethods Integration Server is that it's a strong ESB. It also has strong API modules and portals."
"One valuable feature is that it is event-driven, so when new data is available on the source it can be quickly processed and displayed. Integration is definitely another useful feature, and B2B is one area where webMethods has its own unique thing going, whereby we can do monitoring of transactions, monitoring of client onboarding, and so on."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is its reliability. It has a lot of great documentation from the service providers. Additionally, it is easy to use."
"I feel comfortable using this product with its ease of building interfaces for developers. This is a better integration tool for integrating with various applications like Oracle, Salesforce, mainframes, etc. It works fine in the integration of legacy software as well."
"Given that you have one integration API in place, it takes very minimal effort to scale it to any other application that might want to use the same. Its flow-based development environment is a breeze and makes it really easy to re-use most of the existing components and build up a new API."
"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."
"The tool is very powerful and user-friendly."
"The initial setup isn't too complex."
"Need to see more API portal features like monetizing APIs and private cloud readiness."
"The initial setup of the webMethods Integration Server is not easy but it gets easier once you know it. It is tiresome but not difficult."
"We need more dashboards and reporting engines that can provide detailed information for management. In short, we need better analytics."
"Other products have been using AI and cloud enhancements, but webMethods Integration Server is still lagging in that key area."
"The UI for the admin console is very old. It hasn't been updated for years and is pretty much the same one that we started with. This is something that could be refreshed and made more modern."
"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."
"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."
"Forced migration from MessageBroker to Universal Messaging requires large scale reimplementation for JMS."
"The maintenance aspect is too heavy."
More webMethods Integration Server Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
webMethods Integration Server is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) with 60 reviews while WebRatio is ranked 56th in Business Process Management (BPM). webMethods Integration Server is rated 8.0, while WebRatio is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of webMethods Integration Server writes "Event-driven with lots of helpful formats, but minimal learning resources available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WebRatio writes "Little coding needed and speeds development time but lacks documentation". webMethods Integration Server is most compared with IBM Integration Bus, webMethods.io Integration, Mule ESB, TIBCO BusinessWorks and Boomi AtomSphere Integration, whereas WebRatio is most compared with .
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.