We performed a comparison between Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS and VMware RabbitMQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, IBM, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Message Queue (MQ) Software."JBoss is easy to use, and we have a good partner here in Tunisia to provide local support."
"Reliability for the messages is key. RabbitMQ ensures your messages are safe. They are not deleted and stuff."
"It is easy to use. The addition of more queues and more services can be managed very easily."
"RabbitMQ will help to remove a lot of the complexities and create a loosely coupled codebase."
"Companies can scale the solution, so long as they have server room."
"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."
"The product's reliability is the most valuable feature."
"The message routing is the most valuable feature. It is effective and flexible."
"The solution has really cool features to use. Its management console is excellent. You can utilize plugins to view the performance of the whole service on one network."
"JBoss could add more automation."
"The support feature could benefit from some improvement in terms of accessibility and responsiveness."
"Implementing a circuit breaker scenario using RabbitMQ is complicated. This complexity arises because manual intervention is required to manage worker details and handle operations based on worker IP addresses."
"The availability could be better."
"If you're outside IP address range, the clustering no longer has all the features which is problematic."
"When you have complex tasks, RabbitMQ is hard to use."
"The user interface could be improved."
"VMware RabbitMQ needs to create a new queue system."
"We needed to configure additional plugins. While it was relatively easy to do this on-premises, it became more challenging in the cloud."
Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is ranked 12th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 1 review while VMware RabbitMQ is ranked 5th in Message Queue (MQ) Software with 40 reviews. Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is rated 8.0, while VMware RabbitMQ is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS writes "It's scalable and easy to use, and we have local support here in Tunisia". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware RabbitMQ writes "Reliable queueing functionality and versatile tool that can be used with any programming languages ". Red Hat JBoss A-MQ for xPaaS is most compared with IBM MQ and Apache Kafka, whereas VMware RabbitMQ is most compared with IBM MQ, Apache Kafka, Anypoint MQ, ActiveMQ and Red Hat AMQ.
See our list of best Message Queue (MQ) Software vendors.
We monitor all Message Queue (MQ) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
