We performed a comparison between Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service and Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring.
"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."
"Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring gives us complete visibility without the need for storage."
"The most valuable feature is log reporting."
"I find the monitoring console very helpful. With one click, I can see how we are performing, and at the same time, I can see what data is flowing."
"Splunk has drawn our attention to how the network is running. If there are alarms on things that are not functioning, it gives us early warning on problems that could arise."
"The product retains a lot of log data for subsequent analysis."
"The initial setup was straightforward. We didn't find it to be too complex."
"The data collection from our VMs, containers, databases, and backend components is valuable."
"It is a great resource for us because we have so many different data sources and to be able to aggregate that and put it through a concise dashboard or an alert really helps."
"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."
"The price has room for improvement."
"They do not have all the features that I expect right now."
"I would like to see an improvement and some innovation in the customer interface."
"The solution's stability is an area that has room for improvement. It needs to provide constant stability to its users."
"In the next release, I would like to see more integration with other solutions."
"It's a bit difficult to use. It takes some time to get into it and to get it to do what you would like it to do. It is not straightforward to use it."
"A lot of customers had a hard time effectively searching within the data in Splunk. There is a learning curve from searches to indexes and using all the macros that we have created. It is a little difficult for somebody who has not used it quite a bit and does not have a lot of practice with it, but the AI features that we have been hearing about through Splunk will make it a lot easier for us to use human language to search this data. That is big. That is pretty powerful, and that will help a lot with our customers."
"There is a lot of room for improvement with the automation."
More Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is ranked 40th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is ranked 13th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 23 reviews. Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is rated 9.0, while Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service writes "Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring writes "Helps to ingest a massive amount of raw data and use it effectively". Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios XI and Nagios Core, whereas Splunk Infrastructure Monitoring is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Nagios XI, Cisco Intersight, Amazon CloudWatch and ITRS Geneos.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
