Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs SQL Azure comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo
1,102 views|523 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
11,173 views|5,178 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer and SQL Azure based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Database as a Service solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs. SQL Azure Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"I am particularly fond of the intelligent capabilities that enhance the backend, utilizing technology to analyze SQL queries.""The most valuable feature is that it is based on Exadata infrastructure, which is Oracle 's leading engineered system that is trusted, fault-tolerant, and has unique performance features.""Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime.""I like that Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is a stable, well-positioned product in the market today, and it's very scalable."

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Pros →

"The main advantage of it is that there is no infrastructure cost. We don't have to host it here. So, there is no infrastructure cost.""What I like the most is the processes and the easiness of deployments.""The most valuable aspects of this solution are the integration with the darknet stack especially Microsoft, table groups, supports major capability requirements, and SQL always-on feature.""The most valuable feature of SQL Azure is centralized authentication because I'm using the domain, user name, and password, for Microsoft 365 account with multifactor authentication and the security has been working well.""The solution has become easier to use over time and it's also reasonably priced.""In terms of stability, because Microsoft is the underlying technology, they are much more stable than say Oracle. Since 2014 they did a great job in offering stability, performance and high visibility on the solution, especially in comparison to the other competitors.""We have come from hosting on-premise for customers, or they've done it themselves with SQL. We've now taken a cloud offering for the equivalent services of standard database management and the inbuilt backup and restore offerings. The scalability is probably the biggest feature that we are benefiting from by being in the cloud.""The interface is awesome."

More SQL Azure Pros →

Cons
"As a customer, you can't see the boot messages of your virtualized guest machines.""We had some problems in the developer's environment. We had some problems with the initial installation environment.""For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity.""A room for improvement in Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is that they need to train more partners to gain more knowledge because currently, they are keeping a lot to themselves. For example, they are still keeping a lot of information on their campus, so information sharing is limited."

More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Cons →

"The pricing plans when using multiple Microsoft solutions are complex and have room for improvement.""There is room for improvement regarding the pricing structure.""It can have more dashboards for monitoring, which would naturally help a lot. Other than that, everything is okay.""If we need to deploy data management or services with SQL Azure we need InterSecure.""They should also simplify the security in Azure. We are using the cloud as a platform, so there is no physical infrastructure. We're using Azure components like databases and servers to create an application. Integrating those components in terms of permissions and security is challenging for us. Maybe there is a lack of knowledge on our side, but it's not straightforward.""The solution could be less expensive. They need to work on their pricing model.""Lacking in technical documentation.""From a security perspective, although their features are decent, they can always be improved upon, updated, and refined to help protect clients better."

More SQL Azure Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The machine and the cloud model itself already have licensing advantages."
  • "The price is too much."
  • More Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "We have a three-year contract. The cost was somewhere around $70-80,000 for the original deployment, which was about two years ago"
  • "I'm not sure what the exact price is, but it's a moderate amount. It's not too expensive."
  • "The licensing for this solution is based on subscription."
  • "We pay less than $1000 monthly in licensing fees. There are no additional costs."
  • "It is expensive for us. We are looking for something less expensive and thinking of migrating the whole system."
  • "It is reasonable."
  • "It is quite expensive. I would definitely recommend not using the pay-as-you-go model because this will just mean all your money will go to Microsoft. So, really make sure to control resource usage as much as possible."
  • "It's reasonably priced and when you compare it with other products in the cloud environment, it's cheaper."
  • More SQL Azure Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database as a Service solutions are best for your needs.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:Exporting and importing is easy because of its cleanliness, making the process easier. However, setting up the Data Guard was more difficult. Despite this, the client experienced lower downtime.
    Top Answer:For the data migration, we used ZDM. It was not integrated with the databases, and the documentation lacks clarity. Additionally, there were restrictions on using it with the source databases… more »
    Top Answer:The automated scalability feature of SQL Azure has proven to be highly beneficial, particularly when deployed in the cloud.
    Top Answer:I recommend considering a pay-as-you-go pricing model initially.
    Top Answer:The product's pricing needs improvement.
    Ranking
    9th
    Views
    1,102
    Comparisons
    523
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    639
    Rating
    7.5
    2nd
    Views
    11,173
    Comparisons
    5,178
    Reviews
    37
    Average Words per Review
    399
    Rating
    8.5
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    Oracle Cloud@Customer brings Oracle’s complete portfolio of public cloud infrastructure, fully managed cloud services, and Oracle Fusion SaaS applications into your data center. It enables you to run applications faster and lower your costs using the same high-performance capabilities, autonomous operations, and low-cost subscription pricing in Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI). You get all this while maintaining complete control of your data so you can address data residency, security, and connectivity concerns.

    Microsoft Azure SQL Database is a relational database-as-a-service that delivers predictable performance, scalability, business continuity, data protection, and near-zero administration to cloud developers and solution architects. This is the deep technical library for Azure SQL Database.
    Sample Customers
    IBVI, illycaffe, Scottish Water, trueblue, AirAsia, droptank
    adnymics GmbH, LG CNS, Centrebet, netfabb GmbH, MedPlast, Accelera Solutions, Sochi Organizing Committee, realzeit GmbH
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Manufacturing Company14%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Government5%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company20%
    Financial Services Firm15%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization61%
    Computer Software Company5%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Retailer4%
    Company Size
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise75%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business48%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise39%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise64%
    Large Enterprise25%
    Buyer's Guide
    Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs. SQL Azure
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs. SQL Azure and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,662 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is ranked 9th in Database as a Service with 4 reviews while SQL Azure is ranked 2nd in Database as a Service with 90 reviews. Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is rated 8.0, while SQL Azure is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer writes "Reduction in database creation time, provides good performance but challenges when interacting with the OCI console". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SQL Azure writes "The SQL connector effectively syncs data to databases". Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer is most compared with Oracle Database as a Service, Amazon RDS, Google Cloud Spanner, MongoDB Atlas and Google Cloud SQL, whereas SQL Azure is most compared with Amazon RDS, Google Cloud SQL, MongoDB Atlas, Oracle Database as a Service and Google Cloud Spanner. See our Oracle Exadata Cloud at Customer vs. SQL Azure report.

    See our list of best Database as a Service vendors.

    We monitor all Database as a Service reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.