We performed a comparison between OpenText UFT One, Perforce QA Wizard Pro, and Worksoft Certify based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Perforce and others in Functional Testing Tools."The most valuable feature for me is that it works on multiple platforms and technologies."
"The most valuable feature is that it is fast during test execution, unlike LoadRunner."
"It's simple to set up."
"The shared repositories can be used throughout all testing which makes jobs easier."
"We have used it for the web and Windows-based applications. It is very productive in terms of execution."
"Has improved our organization by allowing us to obtain fast, detailed information about the behavior of our products and to supply this to the customer, enabling us to work together without the need for special programming knowledge."
"The initial setup is relatively easy."
"The production and the efficiency of making your test cases can be very high."
"The most valuable feature is the option to pull changes from others or make local changes in your own change list."
"It's very different versus other tools in the past, which were not very modern. It easy for people to automate."
"The solution has cut our clients' test maintenance time for changes, like patches or system upgrades. They used to take a lot of time until the production validation completed. Now, it is just seconds until it is ready, so they can do executions within couple of minutes."
"The turn around time for getting the automation tester familiarized with the tool is very quick, as it doesn't have any coding. It is fairly simple to understand."
"Worksoft has helped us position our company better because the product lets us show our value in terms of the benefits that we bring."
"It is a lot easier to maintain test scripts on Worksoft Certify than on other testing tools that we have had in the past."
"We are mainly using it for the SAP application, and for the SAP application, if you don't have any experience with automation tools, after a few training sessions, you can easily automate the scripts. That's because no specific programming language is used. All resources that I have are specifically SAP resources. They are not from the automation background, but after gaining the knowledge, they are able to develop a script, or when there is any issue while doing regression testing, they are at least able to understand the issue, such as whether the issue is in the code or data."
"The tool itself is highly effective, especially when it comes to comprehensibility for newcomers."
"With autotesting, we have been able to eliminate duplication of test cases across those four areas. This has helped us knock down our number of test cases. Our test cases are also running more optimally. Therefore, it has very much helped in that sense, so we were able to eliminate a lot of test cases and get out of manual silos by running on autotesting, which is more efficient."
"Micro Focus UFT One could benefit from creating modules that are more accessible to non-technical users. Without a developer background or at least basic knowledge of VBScript, using Micro Focus UFT One may not be feasible for everyone. This is something that Micro Focus, now owned by OpenText, should consider in order to cater to business professionals as well. While Micro Focus UFT One does have a recording function, it still requires a certain level of IT proficiency to create effective automation, which may be challenging for those outside of the technical field."
"Sometimes, the results' file size can be intense. I wish it was a little more compact."
"They should include AI-based testing features."
"It should consume less CPU, and the licensing cost could be lower."
"The solution is expensive."
"UFT has a recording feature. They could make the recording feature window bigger for whatever activities that I am recording. It would improve the user experience if they could create a separate floating panel (or have it automatically show on the side) once the recording starts."
"I'd like to see test case-related reports included in the solution."
"I'd like to see UFT integrated more with some of the open source tools like Selenium, where web is involved."
"It would be very helpful if a queue was implemented to handle, for example, 100 requests at the same time."
"The technical support comes on, and says, "Oh, so-and-so link is here, go through that link, and make the modifications." I'm not comfortable in making those changes. I want to schedule a call, share my screen, and have them fix it for me."
"I would like BPP to have more filtering options during the report creation. This would make our customers happy."
"I would like Worksoft Certify to do automation at any layer (the UI layer, API layer, or database layer) and challenge competitors in the RPA industry, like UiPath and Automation Anywhere."
"Web UI testing was difficult in the beginning, as we had a homegrown product, and we had to do the proper object naming."
"The technical support has been good, but sometimes there are little delays. A lot of times when we need support, it's an emergency situation."
"Worksoft Certify's tech support's response time could be improved."
"When it comes to mobile testing, we have a small bottleneck there. You have to buy third-party separate licenses if you want to test on a mobile. Business wise we see room for improvement there, although it's that really critical for us."
"There was a change to Capture 2.0. In the end, there have been some challenges with the newer version. Therefore, the company testers, the local ones, do not want to use Capture 2.0."
Earn 20 points
