We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise and Visual Studio Test Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The tool is very easy to set up and get running."
"The solution supports a number of protocols."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise supports a lot of technologies. The existing performance testing that this tool is capable of is good. The protocols that are available are widely varied when compared to other performance testing tools."
"For me, LoadRunner stands out, especially with its reporting capabilities, the graphs that can be generated, and the unique feature of measuring our application's response alongside our infrastructure metrics, such as CPU, memory, or disk usage, all presented in graph form. This is something other applications struggle to match."
"We are delivering fine performance results and performance recommendations using Performance Center."
"The most valuable feature is the Vuser protocols."
"We implemented through the vendor, who used highly-skilled professionals."
"With Performance Center, the version upgrade is easy. You just have to roll out the new patch or the new version."
"User-friendly ID and direct integration with GitHub are the most valuable."
"Its initial setup process is easy."
"Code testing is the most valuable feature of this solution for developing software."
"The tool is flexible and easy to manage. We use it since it is scalable and easy to use. It integrates with solutions."
"The most valuable feature is the in-built support for C# and .NET projects."
"Easy to use and easily scalable."
"The solution is easy to use and they have also integrated with Microsoft."
"The stability has always been very good."
"The support team needs to be more coordinated."
"The solution can be improved by making it more user-friendly, and by including autocorrelation capability."
"It's not that popular on the cloud."
"OpenText needs to improve in terms of support. With the same support plan but when the product was owned by HP, support was more responsive and better coordinated."
"They had wanted to change the GUI to improve the look and feel. However, since that time, we see a lot of hanging issues."
"Third-party product integrations could be a little more slickly handled."
"I have seen some users report some issues, but I have personally not had any issues."
"OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise needs to improve reporting."
"Its UI could be better."
"The price could be improved."
"There are too many features with the product and I would like there to be less."
"The tool crashes and has high memory consumption."
"The product must provide more integration."
"In Visual Studio we still don't have anything which can pinpoint memory leaks on a certain code line."
"It would be great to support other languages and applications, and that is one of the things we can improve."
"Visual Studio Test Professional is a little pricey."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Visual Studio Test Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is ranked 5th in Performance Testing Tools with 81 reviews while Visual Studio Test Professional is ranked 7th in Functional Testing Tools with 46 reviews. OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is rated 8.4, while Visual Studio Test Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise writes "Saves time and effort, and makes it easy to set up scenarios and execute tests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Visual Studio Test Professional writes "Customization is a key feature as is the ability to integrate with third-party services ". OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise is most compared with OpenText LoadRunner Cloud, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, OpenText Silk Performer, Tricentis NeoLoad and OpenText UFT One, whereas Visual Studio Test Professional is most compared with TFS, Apache JMeter, Tricentis NeoLoad, SmartBear TestComplete and OpenText LoadRunner Professional.
We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.