We performed a comparison between OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise, OpenText LoadRunner Professional, and Tricentis NeoLoad based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Apache, OpenText, Tricentis and others in Performance Testing Tools."The host performance testing of any application using a host/controller is the most valuable feature."
"This product is better oriented to large, enterprise-oriented organizations."
"We are delivering fine performance results and performance recommendations using Performance Center."
"The most valuable part of the product is the way you can scale the basic testing easily."
"Provides the performance of load test applications and reliably on good reporting."
"LoadRunner Enterprise's most valuable features are load simulation and creating correlation for parameters."
"Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise supports a lot of technologies. The existing performance testing that this tool is capable of is good. The protocols that are available are widely varied when compared to other performance testing tools."
"For me, LoadRunner stands out, especially with its reporting capabilities, the graphs that can be generated, and the unique feature of measuring our application's response alongside our infrastructure metrics, such as CPU, memory, or disk usage, all presented in graph form. This is something other applications struggle to match."
"It is a good and stable tool."
"The tool's most valuable features are scripting and automation."
"There are various languages that they allow those programs to be written in, whether you want to use Java or something else."
"The reporting is very good in regard to scripting and debugging."
"The stability of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional is very high. It is the leading tool for stability."
"The most valuable features of Micro Focus LoadRunner Professional are scripting and executing the tests."
"The solution is quite stable."
"The reporting mechanism is a valuable feature that generates good reports."
"I like the scripting and parameterization features."
"Tool for load testing and performance testing with good API support and good technical support. Tricentis NeoLoad is absolutely stable and scalable."
"NeoLoad offers better reporting than most competing tools. It is effortless to analyze and measure the reported data. It's also simple to generate a report that most people can read and management can understand. NeoLoad helps you figure out the main issues inside the application."
"I like the solution’s performance and integration. Also, the tool’s help center is very responsive and helpful. They have always helped me within a short duration of time."
"From a functional perspective, the range of tools provided with Tricentis NeoLoad is perhaps the widest."
"Very easy to use the front end and the UI is very good."
"The dashboards give extensive statistics, which help with quick report preparation and analysis."
"The stability is okay."
"New features have been added in latest version and need to be improved with the DevOps integration."
"The product's scalability must be improved."
"Offering a direct integration feature would ensure a completely smooth experience."
"The debugging feature needs to include graphs."
"For such an experienced team as mine, who have been with the product for over ten years, sometimes working with technical support is not that easy."
"In Micro Focus LoadRunner Enterprise, I need to spend a lot of time training people, while on other low-code or no-code platforms, I need not invest that much time."
"The support team needs to be more coordinated."
"Dashboard creation should be implemented, so we can get the results in a desired format."
"Instead of having too many graphs and tabs, use the analysis section to get a more simplified defect analysis."
"Improvement wise, the pipeline should be enabled. It should be embedded as part of the tool itself rather than going with third-party tools. Monitoring should be more effective as well."
"The debugging capability should be improved."
"I would like them to lower the licensing cost and provide better support."
"We'd like the solution to be a bit more user-friendly."
"There is room for improvement of the pilot processing, the dump analysis, and forwarding results based on the dump analysis. We have a generator, root controller, different agents, and an analyzer, so all of these are very important when it comes to LoadRunner."
"Micro Focus has two separate products for web and mobile applications, which means you have to invest in both."
"Support for Microsoft Dynamics needs improvement."
"The solution’s pricing is higher compared to other tools. Though the product’s reports are accurate, it needs to be more detailed like other tools."
"The product must improve the features that allow integration with CI/CD pipelines."
"There is room for improvement with the support and community documentation as it can be difficult to find answers to questions quickly."
"I would like to see support for auto-correlations."
"I didn't like much of the support that you get from the Tricentis group unless it was after it integrated with Tricentis; the support is not that good."
"In future releases, it would be good if extra added features for integration are added into NeoLoad."
"Most people focus on HTTPS or TCP, but it would be good to have support for a variety of different protocols."
"Sometimes it's complicated to maintain the test cases. It's much easier than in JMeter, however. I'm not sure if this depends so much on NeoLoad, or is more based on the environment that we are testing."
More OpenText LoadRunner Enterprise Pricing and Cost Advice →
More OpenText LoadRunner Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →