We performed a comparison between OpenText Cloud Service Automation and vCenter Orchestrator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about VMware, Nutanix, IBM and others in Cloud Management."The most valuable feature of Micro Focus Cloud Service is how user friendly the solution is."
"The tool's most valuable feature is life cycle management."
"The technical support services are excellent."
"The solution is pretty stable and reliable."
"The most crucial feature of vCenter is its scalability. We can use it to expand our network, so we don't have to report our client devices. The network configuration features are also helpful because we can migrate entire networks."
"It is very stable. I have been using vCenter Orchestrator from version three now to six plus."
"The solution's ability to template and easily implement are the most valuable features. It offers good replication as well."
"It's 100% stable, it's always stable. We haven't had any bugs. The solution works very well and we haven't had any problems."
"We can scale the solution."
"The solution's most valuable feature is its good automation features."
"OpenText Cloud Service Automation needs to incorporate easier installation. It should improve skills and quality of support."
"I would like fewer restrictions as a software tester."
"I would like to see a greater ability to do mobile administration."
"Mainly VMware integrates with other products, but there is no easy way to link with other products from a different vendor. We can integrate with other products from the same vendors fairly well, but if they could make it so integration is easier with other vendors, that would really help."
"There are some update-related issues with the product."
"I believe vCenter Orchestrator should be part of VMware vSphere's basic bundle. As a product, vCenter Orchestrator should not be licensed at all because the world has progressed way beyond what it can offer."
"The solution needs to integrate with Cloud facilities like AWS and Azure."
"The solution's price could be cheaper."
"Using this solution requires a lot of experience."
"vCenter Orchestrator's debugging capacity could be improved."
More OpenText Cloud Service Automation Pricing and Cost Advice →
OpenText Cloud Service Automation is ranked 27th in Cloud Management with 6 reviews while vCenter Orchestrator is ranked 9th in Process Automation with 44 reviews. OpenText Cloud Service Automation is rated 9.0, while vCenter Orchestrator is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Service Automation writes "Comes with life cycle management features but needs improvement in installation ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of vCenter Orchestrator writes "Enables us to do administration on a centralized layer when using multiple VMware ESX servers". OpenText Cloud Service Automation is most compared with Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, whereas vCenter Orchestrator is most compared with VMware Aria Automation, VMware Aria Operations, vCloud Director, Cisco UCS Director and ServiceNow Orchestration.
We monitor all Cloud Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
