We performed a comparison between MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager and SAP Integration Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two API Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Both the cloud and on-premises options are available. Customers can leverage the MuleSoft Cloud platform to deploy the applications or set up their own online infrastructure to deploy applications."
"The security features are good. It's easy to configure the end-to-end integration with existing applications."
"Technical support has been helpful."
"The scalability is good. It's passable."
"The ease of policy maintenance and API functionality are key features for me. They streamline business processes by allowing configurable control over policies, instead of writing codes and making maintenance more straightforward."
"It provides various advantages in the integration field, including support for Azure services and cloud integrations."
"Anypoint API Manager's most valuable feature is its connectors."
"The auto-creation of the API documentation is useful."
"The SAP Integration Suite can work with different authentication methods. It supports physical authentication, certificate-based integration, and mTLS authentication. This allows customers to choose the best integration approach based on their policies and procedures. Additionally, the suite offers both push and data integration capabilities."
"The solution is easy to use."
"The technical support services are good."
"The most beneficial feature for our clients is the easy access to their information, achieved effortlessly through integration."
"They should develop on MuleSoft as it would be a good way of improving API monetization."
"Anypoint could be improved by making it more open and configurable for small companies, who tend not to consider the solution as it's expensive and requires a lot of costs upfront."
"We find that the enterprise level is lacking scalability."
"The product's price should be available for public review since it is not currently available for others to see, making it one of the areas where the product has certain shortcomings."
"I would like to see more automation. Operations are done manually. It should also automate in the operation."
"The initial setup, if you go back three or three and a half years, definitely, for us, was complex."
"The cost model could be improved."
"I would like to see MuleSoft expand the range of APIs you can manage with it beyond HTTP, GIPC, and others."
"The instances are costly."
"They could provide graphical data for over-viewing metrics such as payments, receipts, creditors, and refunds."
"The setup process for the SAP integration Suite is not straightforward. It involves some technical aspects and can be complex."
"The product's UI could be faster."
More MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is ranked 4th in API Management with 47 reviews while SAP Integration Suite is ranked 24th in API Management with 4 reviews. MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is rated 8.2, while SAP Integration Suite is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager writes "Responsive technical support, low tickets issued showing great stability, and limitless expansion". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP Integration Suite writes "Has many add-on services and supports different authentication methods ". MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management, Amazon API Gateway, Apigee, IBM API Connect and Kong Gateway Enterprise, whereas SAP Integration Suite is most compared with Microsoft Azure API Management and Axway AMPLIFY API Management. See our MuleSoft Anypoint API Manager vs. SAP Integration Suite report.
See our list of best API Management vendors.
We monitor all API Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.