We performed a comparison between Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation and VMware SD-WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Zscaler, TitanHQ and others in Internet Security."Menlo Security RBI's best feature is its threat isolation engine."
"One of the key use cases for VMware SD-WAN was assisting a customer in the industrial zone. They required virtualized servers and wanted to enable VMware SD-WAN to connect their sites in Japan or China. We assisted in building the system by integrating VMware servers and utilizing the Cisco suite."
"Initially, we had a scattered environment, but VMware SD-WAN helped us achieve centralization, which was beneficial."
"I have found the dynamic multipoint protocol(DNPO) most useful because it can tell you which is the best circuit to use for different types of traffic."
"Proactively detects where problems might arise."
"It can be used for load balancing and load sharing. It's easy to use and customizable."
"There are 400 functionalities of the system."
"Anyone can migrate over to VeloCloud, it's that simple, just plug in the necessary cables and it's done."
"It is very simple to configure. When you use the cloud to configure the equipment, it has zero-touch provisioning."
"Menlo Security RBI could be more cloud-friendly, and its mobility could be improved."
"The solution is pricey. It could be cheaper."
"There are a number of customers we have that require a fully mashed SD-WAN on VeloCloud that is not available currently."
"There is no security included, which is something that should be improved."
"They need more gateways"
"Some of the service providers that use VeloCloud as their SD-WAN should be enabled to have better global visibility."
"VMware SD-WAN could improve if the hardware could integrate the interface using ICP. Additionally, if VMware SD-WAN is used with SSE providers that use tunnels there are some issues prioritizing traffic because it cannot decrypt."
"I would like to improve the tool’s cloud security features. I would like to see high-throughput hardware requests in the product’s next release. The solution should also support multiple gigs which could be around ten."
"The solution needs improvement on security features and should include two firewalls. Cloud VPN can’t support any link. The solution needs to also improve the availability of centralized internal management. It needs to have debug detection and Deep Packet Detection features as well. The documentation for VMware is also hard to find."
More Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation Pricing and Cost Advice →
Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is ranked 8th in Internet Security with 1 review while VMware SD-WAN is ranked 4th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 50 reviews. Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is rated 8.0, while VMware SD-WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation writes "Stable and scalable solution with a great threat isolation engine". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SD-WAN writes "To fully utilize cloud vendors' hardware networking, Microsoft and VMware support everything". Menlo Security Remote Browser Isolation is most compared with Zscaler Internet Access, Cisco Umbrella, Cloudflare Access, Perimeter 81 and Skyhigh Security, whereas VMware SD-WAN is most compared with Cisco SD-WAN, Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, Cato SASE Cloud Platform and Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform.
We monitor all Internet Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.