Karamba SafeCAN vs Nozomi Networks comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Karamba Security Logo
28 views|5 comparisons
Nozomi Logo
5,290 views|3,542 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Karamba SafeCAN and Nozomi Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Nozomi, Claroty, Tenable and others in Operational Technology (OT) Security.
To learn more, read our detailed Nozomi Networks vs. Tenable OT Security Report (Updated: March 2024).
769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Use Karamba SafeCAN?
MA. REGINA GALANG
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "I have not seen any competition in terms of pricing, and it is quite reasonable."
  • More Nozomi Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operational Technology (OT) Security solutions are best for your needs.
    769,630 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of Nozomi Networks is its security features.
    Top Answer:The solution should include an integration library.
    Ranking
    Views
    28
    Comparisons
    5
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    5,290
    Comparisons
    3,542
    Reviews
    1
    Average Words per Review
    187
    Rating
    9.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    SafeCAN
    SCADAguardian
    Learn More
    Overview

    SafeCAN is a patented ultra-light network security solution that authenticates and encrypts communications between ECUs—with zero network overhead.

    In the past, industrial control systems weren’t considered high risk for cyberattacks because they weren’t connected to enterprise systems or the internet.
    Today, the use of common technology platforms, IT/OT data sharing, and cloud-based applications and analytics have made OT and IoT systems a primary target for threat actors. CIOs and CISOs are now expected to protect the entire IT/OT landscape, including all physical assets and industrial processes. To achieve this, OT and IoT security needs to be part of an overall digital security strategy managed by a collaborative IT/OT team.

    Sample Customers
    Wind River, Micron, QNX, arm, micron
    Enel, FireEye, GlaxoSmithKline, VEC, TAGSEC Group
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company12%
    Energy/Utilities Company12%
    Government6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business19%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise68%

    Karamba SafeCAN is ranked 16th in Operational Technology (OT) Security while Nozomi Networks is ranked 1st in Operational Technology (OT) Security with 3 reviews. Karamba SafeCAN is rated 0.0, while Nozomi Networks is rated 9.4. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nozomi Networks writes "Has good security features and can be used for OT visibility". Karamba SafeCAN is most compared with , whereas Nozomi Networks is most compared with Claroty Platform, Tenable OT Security, Dragos, Forescout Platform and Armis.

    See our list of best Operational Technology (OT) Security vendors.

    We monitor all Operational Technology (OT) Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.