We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and Jitterbit Harmony based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), MuleSoft, Matillion and others in Cloud Data Integration."The mass ingestion functionality and the elasticity of the solution are great."
"Replication allows us to fully replicate all objects from Shop Floor Data Collection (SFDC) to in-house/on-premises database in one job."
"The most valuable features of the solution are pushdown, optimization, and partitioning, which can be used for frequent data loading, especially when we have a huge data volume in our company."
"The solution is straightforward."
"Whether we need data cleansing or data mastering, we get it all in one platform."
"Data synchronization tasks."
"The solution's initial setup is quite straightforward."
"REST API: Excellent for scripting control and reporting mechanisms"
"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."
"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."
"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."
"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."
"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."
"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."
"It is a scalable solution."
"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."
"Connectivity could be improved, it can be a little slow."
"Error reporting and debugging need improvement."
"I would also like to have profiling functionalities and quality transformations in the cloud."
"The price modeling could be more flexible."
"One area where Informatica Cloud Data Integration could improve is in providing more accelerators for certain functionalities."
"I have received feedback from certain teams and there is a steep learning curve to use this solution."
"There may be some types of limitations with the performance."
"One area that needs to improve is the user experience because it is very complex. The trial version is very complex so it's not easy to start using the program immediately. You must study the rules first."
"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."
"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."
"The initial setup can be a little bit difficult."
"Its API management capabilities need improvement."
"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."
"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."
"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."
"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while Jitterbit Harmony is ranked 18th in Cloud Data Integration with 13 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while Jitterbit Harmony is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jitterbit Harmony writes "An easy-to-setup solution with good stability ". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and Mule Anypoint Platform, whereas Jitterbit Harmony is most compared with Azure Data Factory, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, MuleSoft Composer, Mule Anypoint Platform and SnapLogic.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.