We performed a comparison between Inedo BuildMaster and TeamCity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."
"Using TeamCity and emailing everyone on fail is one way to emphasize the importance of testing code and showing management why taking the time to test actually does saves time from having to fix bugs on the other end."
"TeamCity is very useful due to the fact that it has a strong plug-in system."
"TeamCity's GUI is nice."
"We would like to see better integration with other version controls, since we encountered difficulty when this we first attempted."
"The integration is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable aspect of the solution is its easy configuration. It also has multiple plugins that can be used especially for building .net applications."
"It's easy to move to a new release because of templates and meta-runners, and agent pooling."
"VCS Trigger: Provides excellent source control support."
"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."
"We've called TeamCity tech support. Unfortunately, all their tech support is based in Europe, so we end up with such a big time crunch that I now need to have one person in the US."
"The upgrade process could be smoother. Upgrading major versions can often cause some pain."
"I need some more graphical design."
"Integrating with certain technologies posed challenges related to time and required support from the respective technology teams to ensure smooth integration with TeamCity."
"Their online documentation is fairly extensive, but sometimes you can end up navigating in circles to find answers. I would like them (or partner with someone) to provide training classes to help newcomers get things up and running more quickly."
"It will benefit this solution if they keep up to date with other CI/CD systems out there."
"If TeamCity could create more out of the box solutions to make it more user friendly and create more use cases, that would be ideal."
"REST API support lacks many features in customization of builds, jobs, and settings."
Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review while TeamCity is ranked 6th in Build Automation with 25 reviews. Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0, while TeamCity is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TeamCity writes "Build management system used to successfully create full request tests and run security scans". Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with , whereas TeamCity is most compared with GitLab, CircleCI, Jenkins, Harness and Tekton.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.